Single-versus multiple-dose antibiotics prophylaxis for cardiac surgery.

S J Bucknell, M Mohajeri, J Low, M McDonald, D G Hill
{"title":"Single-versus multiple-dose antibiotics prophylaxis for cardiac surgery.","authors":"S J Bucknell,&nbsp;M Mohajeri,&nbsp;J Low,&nbsp;M McDonald,&nbsp;D G Hill","doi":"10.1046/j.1440-1622.2000.01837.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study was carried out to determine if single-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis is sufficient for cardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was a prospective non-randomized trial of 353 consecutive patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Group A (n = 151) received 48 h of prophylaxis and Group B (n = 202) received a single dose. Cephazolin was used in all patients except those at high risk from methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) who received teicoplanin and timentin.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was an overall in-hospital infection rate of 2.8%. There was no significant difference in rate or type of infection between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An in-hospital infection rate of 2.8% compares favourably with other reported series. Single-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis is as effective as a 48-h regimen. Targeting high-risk groups is effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":22494,"journal":{"name":"The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1440-1622.2000.01837.x","citationCount":"50","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1622.2000.01837.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 50

Abstract

Background: This study was carried out to determine if single-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis is sufficient for cardiac surgery.

Methods: The study was a prospective non-randomized trial of 353 consecutive patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Group A (n = 151) received 48 h of prophylaxis and Group B (n = 202) received a single dose. Cephazolin was used in all patients except those at high risk from methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) who received teicoplanin and timentin.

Results: There was an overall in-hospital infection rate of 2.8%. There was no significant difference in rate or type of infection between the two groups.

Conclusions: An in-hospital infection rate of 2.8% compares favourably with other reported series. Single-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis is as effective as a 48-h regimen. Targeting high-risk groups is effective.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心脏手术的单剂量与多剂量抗生素预防。
背景:本研究旨在确定单剂量抗菌药物预防是否足以用于心脏手术。方法:该研究是一项前瞻性非随机试验,纳入353例连续接受心脏手术的患者。A组(n = 151)接受48小时的预防治疗,B组(n = 202)接受单剂量治疗。所有患者均使用头孢唑啉,但接受替柯planin和汀丁治疗的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)高风险患者除外。结果:我院住院总感染率为2.8%。两组之间的感染率和感染类型无显著差异。结论:我院住院感染率为2.8%,优于其他系列报道。单剂量抗菌素预防与48小时治疗同样有效。针对高危人群是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hiatus. ELECTROSURGERY: A SHORT HISTORY1 EUTHANASIA: A POINT OF VIEW1 DISSEMINATED INTRAVASCULAR COAGULATION CADE A model for reflecting upon the ethical dilemma of hands-on teaching of surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1