Development of an audit instrument for nursing care plans in the patient record.

C Björvell, I Thorell-Ekstrand, R Wredling
{"title":"Development of an audit instrument for nursing care plans in the patient record.","authors":"C Björvell,&nbsp;I Thorell-Ekstrand,&nbsp;R Wredling","doi":"10.1136/qhc.9.1.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop, validate, and test the reliability of an audit instrument that measures the extent to which patient records describe important aspects of nursing care.</p><p><strong>Material: </strong>Twenty records from each of three hospital wards were collected and audited. The auditors were registered nurses with a knowledge of nursing documentation in accordance with the VIPS model--a model designed to structure nursing documentation. (VIPS is an acronym formed from the Swedish words for wellbeing, integrity, prevention, and security.)</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An audit instrument was developed by determining specific criteria to be met. The audit questions were aimed at revealing the content of the patient for nursing assessment, nursing diagnosis, planned interventions, and outcome. Each of the 60 records was reviewed by the three auditors independently and the reliability of the instrument was tested by calculating the inter-rater reliability coefficient. Content validity was tested by using an expert panel and calculating the content validity ratio. The criterion related validity was estimated by the correlation between the score of the Cat-ch-Ing instrument and the score of an earlier developed and used audit instrument. The results were then tested by using Pearson's correlation coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The new audit instrument, named Cat-ch-Ing, consists of 17 questions designed to judge the nursing documentation. Both quantity and quality variables are judged on a rating scale from zero to three, with a maximum score of 80. The inter-rater reliability coefficients were 0.98, 0.98, and 0.92, respectively for each group of 20 records, the content validity ratio ranged between 0.20 and 1.0 and the criterion related validity showed a significant correlation of r = 0.68 (p < 0.0001, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.76) between the two audit instruments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Cat-ch-Ing instrument has proved to be a valid and reliable audit instrument for nursing records when the VIPS model is used as the basis of the documentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":20773,"journal":{"name":"Quality in health care : QHC","volume":"9 1","pages":"6-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/qhc.9.1.6","citationCount":"105","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality in health care : QHC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/qhc.9.1.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 105

Abstract

Objectives: To develop, validate, and test the reliability of an audit instrument that measures the extent to which patient records describe important aspects of nursing care.

Material: Twenty records from each of three hospital wards were collected and audited. The auditors were registered nurses with a knowledge of nursing documentation in accordance with the VIPS model--a model designed to structure nursing documentation. (VIPS is an acronym formed from the Swedish words for wellbeing, integrity, prevention, and security.)

Methods: An audit instrument was developed by determining specific criteria to be met. The audit questions were aimed at revealing the content of the patient for nursing assessment, nursing diagnosis, planned interventions, and outcome. Each of the 60 records was reviewed by the three auditors independently and the reliability of the instrument was tested by calculating the inter-rater reliability coefficient. Content validity was tested by using an expert panel and calculating the content validity ratio. The criterion related validity was estimated by the correlation between the score of the Cat-ch-Ing instrument and the score of an earlier developed and used audit instrument. The results were then tested by using Pearson's correlation coefficient.

Results: The new audit instrument, named Cat-ch-Ing, consists of 17 questions designed to judge the nursing documentation. Both quantity and quality variables are judged on a rating scale from zero to three, with a maximum score of 80. The inter-rater reliability coefficients were 0.98, 0.98, and 0.92, respectively for each group of 20 records, the content validity ratio ranged between 0.20 and 1.0 and the criterion related validity showed a significant correlation of r = 0.68 (p < 0.0001, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.76) between the two audit instruments.

Conclusion: The Cat-ch-Ing instrument has proved to be a valid and reliable audit instrument for nursing records when the VIPS model is used as the basis of the documentation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为病人记录中的护理计划开发一种审计工具。
目的:开发、验证和测试审计工具的可靠性,该工具可测量患者记录对护理重要方面的描述程度。资料:收集并审计了三个医院病房各20份记录。审核员是具有护理文件知识的注册护士,符合VIPS模型——一种设计用于构建护理文件的模型。(VIPS是瑞典语的首字母缩略词,意为幸福、诚信、预防和安全。)方法:通过确定具体的审计标准制定审计工具。审计问题旨在揭示患者护理评估、护理诊断、计划干预和结果的内容。60项记录中的每一项都由三名审计员独立审查,并通过计算评估者之间的可靠性系数来测试仪器的可靠性。采用专家小组法和计算内容效度比来检验内容效度。标准相关效度是通过Cat-ch-Ing量表得分与早期开发和使用的审计量表得分之间的相关性来估计的。然后用Pearson相关系数对结果进行检验。结果:新编制的“Cat-ch-Ing”审计量表由17个问题组成,用于对护理文件进行判断。数量和质量变量都是根据从0到3的评分来判断的,最高得分为80分。每组20条记录的评估间信度系数分别为0.98、0.98和0.92,内容效度比在0.20 ~ 1.0之间,两种审计工具的标准相关效度显示r = 0.68 (p < 0.0001, 95% CI 0.57 ~ 0.76)的显著相关性。结论:采用VIPS模型作为记录基础,Cat-ch-Ing仪器是一种有效可靠的护理记录审计工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Engaging patients in decisions: a challenge to health care delivery and public health. The extent of patients' understanding of the risk of treatments. Preferences and understanding their effects on health. Evidence-based patient empowerment. Performance management at the crossroads in the NHS: don't go into the red.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1