Early discharge following coronary bypass surgery: is it safe?

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Pub Date : 2000-07-01 DOI:10.1016/s1010-7940(00)00467-x
M Loubani, N Mediratta, M S Hickey, M Galiñanes
{"title":"Early discharge following coronary bypass surgery: is it safe?","authors":"M Loubani,&nbsp;N Mediratta,&nbsp;M S Hickey,&nbsp;M Galiñanes","doi":"10.1016/s1010-7940(00)00467-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Early discharge has been proposed as a means of containing the escalating cost of health care in cardiac surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate whether shortening the length of hospital stay after coronary artery bypass surgery is safe and cost effective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients (n=198) undergoing elective bypass surgery by two surgeons for a period of 12 months were prospectively entered into the study but not randomized. The anaesthetic and surgical treatments were identical in all patients with the exception that one of the surgeons used intermittent cold crystalloid cardioplegia ('normal discharge' group; n=119) and the other used intermittent ischaemia without cardioplegia ('early discharge' group; n=79). Previous to the study both surgeons discharged patients on the 7th-8th postoperative day. For the present study, one of the two surgeons adopted the new policy of discharging patients on the 4th postoperative day ('early discharge' group). The criteria for hospital discharge included: presence of sinus rhythm, absence of pyrexia and wound infection, normal routine blood tests, satisfactory chest X-ray and ECG and full mobility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The clinical characteristics were identical in the two groups. The number of grafts per patient was 2.8+/-0.8 and 3.2+/-1.0, and the total ischaemic time 47+/-13 and 46+/-14 min in the normal and early discharge groups, respectively (P=NS in each instance). In the normal discharge group the mean hospital stay was 7.7+/-3.3 days whereas in the early discharge group it was 4.7+/-2.0 days (P<0. 0001) with 73.5% of the patients being discharged within the first 4 days following surgery. The shortening of hospital stay resulted in a mean reduction of costs of pound750/patient. There was no operative mortality (<30 days following surgery) and the incidence of non-fatal perioperative complications were similar in the two groups, with the exception that the incidence of supraventricular arrhythmias was significantly higher in the normal discharge group than in the early discharge group (33% vs. 6.3% respectively; P<0. 0001). These rhythm abnormalities occurred within the first 4 days in 89% of patients following surgery and were the cause of readmission in only one patient in the normal discharge group. There were a total of ten (8.4%) readmissions in the normal discharge group and three (3.8%) in the early discharge group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Shortening the postoperative hospital stay to 4 days following elective coronary bypass surgery appears to be safe and can be a means of reducing the cost of care. This in turn may result in a greater availability of resources and in an effective way of reducing waiting lists.</p>","PeriodicalId":11938,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"22-6"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/s1010-7940(00)00467-x","citationCount":"30","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s1010-7940(00)00467-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

Abstract

Objectives: Early discharge has been proposed as a means of containing the escalating cost of health care in cardiac surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate whether shortening the length of hospital stay after coronary artery bypass surgery is safe and cost effective.

Methods: Patients (n=198) undergoing elective bypass surgery by two surgeons for a period of 12 months were prospectively entered into the study but not randomized. The anaesthetic and surgical treatments were identical in all patients with the exception that one of the surgeons used intermittent cold crystalloid cardioplegia ('normal discharge' group; n=119) and the other used intermittent ischaemia without cardioplegia ('early discharge' group; n=79). Previous to the study both surgeons discharged patients on the 7th-8th postoperative day. For the present study, one of the two surgeons adopted the new policy of discharging patients on the 4th postoperative day ('early discharge' group). The criteria for hospital discharge included: presence of sinus rhythm, absence of pyrexia and wound infection, normal routine blood tests, satisfactory chest X-ray and ECG and full mobility.

Results: The clinical characteristics were identical in the two groups. The number of grafts per patient was 2.8+/-0.8 and 3.2+/-1.0, and the total ischaemic time 47+/-13 and 46+/-14 min in the normal and early discharge groups, respectively (P=NS in each instance). In the normal discharge group the mean hospital stay was 7.7+/-3.3 days whereas in the early discharge group it was 4.7+/-2.0 days (P<0. 0001) with 73.5% of the patients being discharged within the first 4 days following surgery. The shortening of hospital stay resulted in a mean reduction of costs of pound750/patient. There was no operative mortality (<30 days following surgery) and the incidence of non-fatal perioperative complications were similar in the two groups, with the exception that the incidence of supraventricular arrhythmias was significantly higher in the normal discharge group than in the early discharge group (33% vs. 6.3% respectively; P<0. 0001). These rhythm abnormalities occurred within the first 4 days in 89% of patients following surgery and were the cause of readmission in only one patient in the normal discharge group. There were a total of ten (8.4%) readmissions in the normal discharge group and three (3.8%) in the early discharge group.

Conclusion: Shortening the postoperative hospital stay to 4 days following elective coronary bypass surgery appears to be safe and can be a means of reducing the cost of care. This in turn may result in a greater availability of resources and in an effective way of reducing waiting lists.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冠状动脉搭桥术后早期出院:安全吗?
目的:早期出院已被提议作为一种手段,以遏制不断上升的医疗保健费用在心脏手术。本研究的目的是探讨缩短冠状动脉搭桥术后的住院时间是否安全且具有成本效益。方法:由两名外科医生进行为期12个月的择期搭桥手术的患者(n=198)前瞻性纳入研究,但非随机化。所有患者的麻醉和手术治疗方法相同,除了其中一名外科医生使用间歇性冷晶体心脏截瘫(“正常出院”组;N =119),另一组采用无心脏骤停的间歇性缺血(“早期出院”组;n = 79)。在研究之前,两位外科医生均于术后第7 -8天让患者出院。在本研究中,两位外科医生中的一位采用了术后第4天出院的新政策(“提前出院”组)。出院标准包括:有窦性心律,无发热和伤口感染,血常规检查正常,胸片和心电图满意,活动能力充分。结果:两组患者的临床特征完全相同。正常组和早出院组的移植片数分别为2.8+/-0.8片和3.2+/-1.0片,总缺血时间分别为47+/-13和46+/-14 min (P=NS)。正常出院组的平均住院时间为7.7+/-3.3天,而早期出院组的平均住院时间为4.7+/-2.0天(结论:择期冠状动脉搭桥手术后将术后住院时间缩短至4天似乎是安全的,并且可以降低护理成本。这反过来可能导致更多的资源可用性,并以有效的方式减少等候名单。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
564
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The primary aim of the European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery is to provide a medium for the publication of high-quality original scientific reports documenting progress in cardiac and thoracic surgery. The journal publishes reports of significant clinical and experimental advances related to surgery of the heart, the great vessels and the chest. The European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery is an international journal and accepts submissions from all regions. The journal is supported by a number of leading European societies.
期刊最新文献
Long-term survival from a randomized controlled trial of lobectomy by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy for early-stage lung cancer. Ventricular switch procedure: updated outcomes and lessons learned. Prevalence and anatomical characteristics of the left medial basal pulmonary segment: a retrospective cohort study using three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction. Randomized Trials in Cardiac Surgery: Why and How. Sex difference in aortic root replacement with a stentless bioprosthesis†.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1