[Incidence of sensitization to profilin in a population allergic to pollen: responsibility of profilin in pollen polysensitizations in patients with a normal level of total IgE].

Allergie et immunologie Pub Date : 2000-05-01
R Dubost, N Ruet, P Deviller
{"title":"[Incidence of sensitization to profilin in a population allergic to pollen: responsibility of profilin in pollen polysensitizations in patients with a normal level of total IgE].","authors":"R Dubost,&nbsp;N Ruet,&nbsp;P Deviller","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>The study had the aim of establishing the incidence of sensitization to profilin (a panallergen found in pollens and foods of vegetal origin) in pollen-allergic patients. We evaluated the consequences of such sensitizations on the results of specific IgE, the positivity of skin tests and clinical signs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>94 consenting patients, allergic to pollens (trees and/or grasses and/or weeds) replied to a questionnaire and had skin tests to purified profilin and measurement of serum anti-profilin IgE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two groups were defined: one group was sensitized to profilin (GSP), with positive skin test and anti profilin IgE of 31 patients, and a group non-sensitive to profilin (GNSP) (negative skin test and anti-profilin IgE) of 41 patients. Discordant results were found in 22 patients. Taking in account the two groups, sensitization to profilin was 43%. The two groups were homogenous for age, sex, ethnics and clinical signs. Food allergy was more frequent but not statistically different (p = 0.09) in the group GSP (51.6%) than the GNSP (31.7%), in particular allergy to fruits of the Rosaceae family. Pollen polysensitization (to three species, trees, weeds and grasses) was more frequent in the GSP group (64.5%) than the GNSP (12.5). Polysensitization to pollens and foods was also more frequent in the sensitized group (65.5%) than in the non-sensitized group (12.5%). In a sub-group with normal levels of total IgE pollen polysensitization was more frequent in patients who were sensitive to profilin. On biological investigation, sensitization to profilin influenced the result of anti-latex IgE and also the IgE to many vegetal allergens. These results show the value of seeking a sensitization to profilin in patients with pollinoses.</p>","PeriodicalId":76988,"journal":{"name":"Allergie et immunologie","volume":"32 5","pages":"199-206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergie et immunologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unlabelled: The study had the aim of establishing the incidence of sensitization to profilin (a panallergen found in pollens and foods of vegetal origin) in pollen-allergic patients. We evaluated the consequences of such sensitizations on the results of specific IgE, the positivity of skin tests and clinical signs.

Methods: 94 consenting patients, allergic to pollens (trees and/or grasses and/or weeds) replied to a questionnaire and had skin tests to purified profilin and measurement of serum anti-profilin IgE.

Results: Two groups were defined: one group was sensitized to profilin (GSP), with positive skin test and anti profilin IgE of 31 patients, and a group non-sensitive to profilin (GNSP) (negative skin test and anti-profilin IgE) of 41 patients. Discordant results were found in 22 patients. Taking in account the two groups, sensitization to profilin was 43%. The two groups were homogenous for age, sex, ethnics and clinical signs. Food allergy was more frequent but not statistically different (p = 0.09) in the group GSP (51.6%) than the GNSP (31.7%), in particular allergy to fruits of the Rosaceae family. Pollen polysensitization (to three species, trees, weeds and grasses) was more frequent in the GSP group (64.5%) than the GNSP (12.5). Polysensitization to pollens and foods was also more frequent in the sensitized group (65.5%) than in the non-sensitized group (12.5%). In a sub-group with normal levels of total IgE pollen polysensitization was more frequent in patients who were sensitive to profilin. On biological investigation, sensitization to profilin influenced the result of anti-latex IgE and also the IgE to many vegetal allergens. These results show the value of seeking a sensitization to profilin in patients with pollinoses.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[花粉过敏人群中对profile过敏的发生率:总IgE水平正常的患者中profile对花粉多致敏的责任]。
未标记:该研究旨在确定花粉过敏患者对profilin(一种在花粉和植物性食物中发现的全过敏原)致敏的发生率。我们评估了这些致敏对特异性IgE结果、皮肤试验阳性和临床症状的影响。方法:94例对花粉(树木和/或草和/或杂草)过敏的患者填写了一份调查问卷,并进行了皮肤试验纯化profilin和测定血清抗profilin IgE。结果:分为两组:1组对profilin敏感(GSP),皮试及抗profilin IgE阳性31例;2组对profilin不敏感(GNSP),皮试及抗profilin IgE阴性41例。22例患者结果不一致。考虑到两组,对profilin的敏化率为43%。两组在年龄、性别、民族和临床症状上均具有同质性。食物过敏发生率在GSP组(51.6%)高于GNSP组(31.7%),但差异无统计学意义(p = 0.09),尤其是对蔷薇科水果过敏。花粉多敏化(对树木、杂草和禾草3种植物)在GSP组(64.5%)高于GNSP组(12.5)。对花粉和食物的多致敏在致敏组(65.5%)比非致敏组(12.5%)更频繁。在总IgE水平正常的亚组中,花粉多致敏在对profilin敏感的患者中更为常见。在生物学调查中,对profilin的致敏影响了抗乳胶IgE的结果,也影响了对许多植物过敏原的IgE。这些结果显示了在花粉患者中寻找对profilin致敏的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Free radicals]. Chronic cough induced by abacavir apart from a context of hypersensitivity. Capillary leakage syndrome: a case report and a review. [Value of quantitative IgE measurement]. [Compendium of specific IgE values according to professional allergists].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1