DNA content of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an independent prognostic indicator.

Cancer detection and prevention Pub Date : 2000-01-01
M M Hsu, C R Chiou, J Y Ko, T S Sheen, R L Hong, L L Ting
{"title":"DNA content of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an independent prognostic indicator.","authors":"M M Hsu,&nbsp;C R Chiou,&nbsp;J Y Ko,&nbsp;T S Sheen,&nbsp;R L Hong,&nbsp;L L Ting","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to examine whether tumor DNA content correlated with prognosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). DNA flow-cytometric analysis in fresh specimens of nasopharyngeal biopsy from 123 patients with clinical suspicion of NPC was collected initially. Histopathologic study and successful flow-cytometric analysis had 28 lymphoid hyperplasias and 87 NPCs. Seventeen NPC patients were treated elsewhere and were excluded. A total of 98 patients, including 28 lymphoid hyperplasias and 70 NPCs, formed the materials of this study. There were 34 (49%) diploid and 36 (51%) aneuploid in NPC patients. No lymphoid hyperplasias were aneuploid. The mean of S-phase fraction was higher in NPC than in lymphoid hyperplasia (P < .001), indicating higher cellular activity in NPC. DNA content failed to associate with age, gender, pathology, distant metastasis, and stage, indicating that DNA content was an independent prognostic indicator and possibly a clinical parameter. The log-rank test of overall survival curves was significant for stage (P = .002) and DNA ploidy (P = .042); it was almost significant for S-phase fraction (P = .057). Because the follow-up duration was not long enough, univariate and multivariate analysis were not significant for stage, ploidy, and S-phase fraction, except for distant metastasis. It is also most likely colinearity of clinical stage and distant metastasis that explained why clinical stage could not show significance in prognosis. Interestingly, the DNA content appeared to be a potential prognostic parameter in overall survival, although it was not statistically significant (P = .052). Our data suggested that NPC patients with aneuploid DNA and high S-phase fraction tend to have poor prognosis and should be treated more aggressively, even in the early stage of the disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":9499,"journal":{"name":"Cancer detection and prevention","volume":"24 2","pages":"119-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer detection and prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine whether tumor DNA content correlated with prognosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). DNA flow-cytometric analysis in fresh specimens of nasopharyngeal biopsy from 123 patients with clinical suspicion of NPC was collected initially. Histopathologic study and successful flow-cytometric analysis had 28 lymphoid hyperplasias and 87 NPCs. Seventeen NPC patients were treated elsewhere and were excluded. A total of 98 patients, including 28 lymphoid hyperplasias and 70 NPCs, formed the materials of this study. There were 34 (49%) diploid and 36 (51%) aneuploid in NPC patients. No lymphoid hyperplasias were aneuploid. The mean of S-phase fraction was higher in NPC than in lymphoid hyperplasia (P < .001), indicating higher cellular activity in NPC. DNA content failed to associate with age, gender, pathology, distant metastasis, and stage, indicating that DNA content was an independent prognostic indicator and possibly a clinical parameter. The log-rank test of overall survival curves was significant for stage (P = .002) and DNA ploidy (P = .042); it was almost significant for S-phase fraction (P = .057). Because the follow-up duration was not long enough, univariate and multivariate analysis were not significant for stage, ploidy, and S-phase fraction, except for distant metastasis. It is also most likely colinearity of clinical stage and distant metastasis that explained why clinical stage could not show significance in prognosis. Interestingly, the DNA content appeared to be a potential prognostic parameter in overall survival, although it was not statistically significant (P = .052). Our data suggested that NPC patients with aneuploid DNA and high S-phase fraction tend to have poor prognosis and should be treated more aggressively, even in the early stage of the disease.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鼻咽癌DNA含量:一个独立的预后指标。
本研究的目的是探讨鼻咽癌(NPC)肿瘤DNA含量是否与预后相关。对123例临床疑似鼻咽癌患者的新鲜鼻咽活检标本进行了DNA流式细胞术分析。组织病理学检查和流式细胞术分析显示淋巴样增生28例,非典型细胞87例。17例鼻咽癌患者在其他地方接受治疗并被排除在外。共98例患者构成本研究的材料,其中淋巴样增生28例,npc 70例。二倍体34例(49%),非整倍体36例(51%)。淋巴样增生未见非整倍体。鼻咽癌s期分数的平均值高于淋巴样增生(P < 0.001),表明鼻咽癌细胞活性较高。DNA含量与年龄、性别、病理、远处转移和分期没有相关性,表明DNA含量是一个独立的预后指标,可能是一个临床参数。总生存曲线的log-rank检验对分期(P = 0.002)和DNA倍性(P = 0.042)有显著性意义;s相分数几乎显著(P = 0.057)。由于随访时间不够长,除远处转移外,单因素和多因素分析对分期、倍性和s期分数均无显著性影响。临床分期与远处转移的共线性也很可能解释了临床分期对预后无显著影响的原因。有趣的是,DNA含量似乎是总生存率的一个潜在预后参数,尽管它没有统计学意义(P = 0.052)。我们的数据表明,非整倍体DNA和高s期分数的鼻咽癌患者往往预后较差,即使在疾病的早期也应更积极地治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abstracts of the 6th International Symposium on Predictive Oncology and Intervention Strategies. Paris, France, 9-12 February 2001. Prognostic impact of Ets-1 overexpression in betel and tobacco related oral cancer. K-ras mutation: early detection in molecular diagnosis and risk assessment of colorectal, pancreas, and lung cancers--a review. Integrated p53 histopathologic/genetic analysis of premalignant lesions of the esophagus. Progression in transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder--analysis of Tp53 gene mutations by temperature gradients and sequence in tumor tissues and in cellular urine sediments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1