Cell surface receptor-antibody association constants and enumeration of receptor sites for monoclonal antibodies.

Cytometry Pub Date : 2000-08-01
O Siiman, A Burshteyn
{"title":"Cell surface receptor-antibody association constants and enumeration of receptor sites for monoclonal antibodies.","authors":"O Siiman,&nbsp;A Burshteyn","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fluorescent markers (labeled antibodies) and flow cytometry are used to enumerate the average number of receptors (antigens) on formed bodies (cells) in whole blood by using a new method that avoids the extra steps of separating bound from unbound fluorescent markers or the use of external standards.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mean channel fluorescence intensities of equilibrated marker-cell suspension mixtures, total concentrations of marker, and targeted cell counts obtained by standard cytometry procedures are used to complete the analyses for receptors per cell. Also, flow cytometric assays using competitive binding between fluorescent marker (CD4-RD1, CD8-FITC, CD3-FITC, CD3-RD1) and unlabeled antibody (CD4, CD8, CD3, CD3-dextran) for receptors on white blood cells in whole blood are described for determination of relative and specific binding constants of unlabeled/labeled antibody for targeted receptors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ranges that were obtained for receptors per cell (lymphocytes) in normal blood donors were as follows: CD4, 4.9 x 10(4)-1.5 x 10(5); CD8, 5.0 x 10(5)-2.1 x 10(6); CD3, 6.6-7.8 x 10(5). Binding constants were highest for unlabeled CD4 antibody, 2. 7 x 10(10)-2.1 x 10(12) M(-1), and then unlabeled CD3 antibody, 1.1 x 10(10)-1.9 x 10(11) M(-1). FITC- and RD1-labeled antibodies typically had binding constants that were 10-to 100-fold lower than the native antibodies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Values of receptors per cell and binding constants obtained by the new method from flow cytometric analyses of mixtures of whole blood with FITC- or RD1-labeled CD4, CD8, and CD3 antibodies compare well with literature values determined by other methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":10947,"journal":{"name":"Cytometry","volume":"40 4","pages":"316-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cytometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fluorescent markers (labeled antibodies) and flow cytometry are used to enumerate the average number of receptors (antigens) on formed bodies (cells) in whole blood by using a new method that avoids the extra steps of separating bound from unbound fluorescent markers or the use of external standards.

Methods: Mean channel fluorescence intensities of equilibrated marker-cell suspension mixtures, total concentrations of marker, and targeted cell counts obtained by standard cytometry procedures are used to complete the analyses for receptors per cell. Also, flow cytometric assays using competitive binding between fluorescent marker (CD4-RD1, CD8-FITC, CD3-FITC, CD3-RD1) and unlabeled antibody (CD4, CD8, CD3, CD3-dextran) for receptors on white blood cells in whole blood are described for determination of relative and specific binding constants of unlabeled/labeled antibody for targeted receptors.

Results: Ranges that were obtained for receptors per cell (lymphocytes) in normal blood donors were as follows: CD4, 4.9 x 10(4)-1.5 x 10(5); CD8, 5.0 x 10(5)-2.1 x 10(6); CD3, 6.6-7.8 x 10(5). Binding constants were highest for unlabeled CD4 antibody, 2. 7 x 10(10)-2.1 x 10(12) M(-1), and then unlabeled CD3 antibody, 1.1 x 10(10)-1.9 x 10(11) M(-1). FITC- and RD1-labeled antibodies typically had binding constants that were 10-to 100-fold lower than the native antibodies.

Conclusions: Values of receptors per cell and binding constants obtained by the new method from flow cytometric analyses of mixtures of whole blood with FITC- or RD1-labeled CD4, CD8, and CD3 antibodies compare well with literature values determined by other methods.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单克隆抗体的细胞表面受体-抗体结合常数和受体位点枚举。
背景:荧光标记(标记抗体)和流式细胞术被用于枚举全血中形成体(细胞)上受体(抗原)的平均数量,这种新方法避免了分离结合和未结合荧光标记的额外步骤或使用外部标准。方法:利用平衡标记物-细胞悬浮液混合物的平均通道荧光强度、标记物的总浓度和标准细胞术获得的靶细胞计数来完成每个细胞的受体分析。此外,流式细胞术使用荧光标记物(CD4- rd1, CD8- fitc, CD3- fitc, CD3- rd1)和未标记抗体(CD4, CD8, CD3, CD3-葡聚糖)对全血白细胞受体进行竞争结合,以确定未标记/标记抗体对目标受体的相对和特异性结合常数。结果:正常献血者每个细胞(淋巴细胞)受体的范围如下:CD4, 4.9 × 10(4)-1.5 × 10(5);CD8, 5.0 × 10(5)-2.1 × 10(6);CD3, 6.6-7.8 × 10(5)。未标记的CD4抗体结合常数最高,2。7 × 10(10)-2.1 × 10(12) M(-1),然后是未标记的CD3抗体,1.1 × 10(10)-1.9 × 10(11) M(-1)。FITC和rd1标记的抗体通常具有比天然抗体低10- 100倍的结合常数。结论:通过流式细胞术分析FITC或rd1标记的CD4、CD8和CD3抗体的全血混合物,新方法获得的每个细胞的受体值和结合常数与文献中其他方法测定的值比较良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
NASA/American Cancer Society High-Resolution Flow Cytometry Project - II. Effect of pH and DAPI concentration on dual parametric analysis of DNA/DAPI fluorescence and electronic nuclear volume. Cell analysis system based on immunomagnetic cell selection and alignment followed by immunofluorescent analysis using compact disk technologies. Caffeine dissociates complexes between DNA and intercalating dyes: application for bleaching fluorochrome-stained cells for their subsequent restaining and analysis by laser scanning cytometry. Characterization of cytokine interactions by flow cytometry and factorial analysis. Multiparameter analysis of human epithelial tumor cell lines by laser scanning cytometry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1