{"title":"Proposed flow cytometric reference method for the determination of erythroid F-cell counts.","authors":"J C Chen, N Bigelow, B H Davis","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quantitation of adult erythrocytes (RBC) containing fetal hemoglobin (F cells) is of potential clinical utility in evaluating erythropoietic disorders, such as myelodysplasia and hemoglobinopathies, and in monitoring F-cell augmenting therapy. F-cell counting methodologies include fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. Previous flow cytometric methods have employed an isotype antibody control to distinguish F cells from non-F cells. We investigated the feasibility of using the orange autofluorescence signal (FL2) in glutaraldehyde-fixed RBC to substitute for fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled isotype control antibody use in F-cell quantitation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our previously published method for fetal red cell detection in fetomaternal hemorrhage was used, employing a FITC-labeled anti-hemoglobin F (HbF) monoclonal antibody reagent. Blood samples with varying F-cell counts were quantitated for F cells using both immunofluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry comparing FITC-labeled isotype to FL1 thresholding defined by FL2 autofluorescence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>F cell percentages obtained by using an FL2 defined threshold for FL1 gating correlated well with expected values in diluted blood samples (r(2) = 0.994, slope = 1. 019, intercept = 0.24), values obtained using an isotype control (r(2) = 0.996, slope = 1.012, intercept = -0.17), and microscopic immunofluorescence counts (r(2) = 0.989, slope = 0.999, intercept = -0.72). F-cell quantitation by the isotype control and FL2 autofluorescence methods was also comparable in 40 blood samples (r(2) = 0.994, slope = 1.014, intercept = 0.03). Intra-assay, interobserver, and interinstrument precision with this autofluorescence gating method exhibited low imprecision (coefficient of variation <14%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This novel method is a more objective and less laborious alternative for F-cell quantitation by flow cytometry compared to using an isotype control or microscopy, thereby providing a more robust methodology for clinical studies and consideration as a laboratory reference method for F-cell counting.</p>","PeriodicalId":10947,"journal":{"name":"Cytometry","volume":"42 4","pages":"239-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cytometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Quantitation of adult erythrocytes (RBC) containing fetal hemoglobin (F cells) is of potential clinical utility in evaluating erythropoietic disorders, such as myelodysplasia and hemoglobinopathies, and in monitoring F-cell augmenting therapy. F-cell counting methodologies include fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. Previous flow cytometric methods have employed an isotype antibody control to distinguish F cells from non-F cells. We investigated the feasibility of using the orange autofluorescence signal (FL2) in glutaraldehyde-fixed RBC to substitute for fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled isotype control antibody use in F-cell quantitation.
Methods: Our previously published method for fetal red cell detection in fetomaternal hemorrhage was used, employing a FITC-labeled anti-hemoglobin F (HbF) monoclonal antibody reagent. Blood samples with varying F-cell counts were quantitated for F cells using both immunofluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry comparing FITC-labeled isotype to FL1 thresholding defined by FL2 autofluorescence.
Results: F cell percentages obtained by using an FL2 defined threshold for FL1 gating correlated well with expected values in diluted blood samples (r(2) = 0.994, slope = 1. 019, intercept = 0.24), values obtained using an isotype control (r(2) = 0.996, slope = 1.012, intercept = -0.17), and microscopic immunofluorescence counts (r(2) = 0.989, slope = 0.999, intercept = -0.72). F-cell quantitation by the isotype control and FL2 autofluorescence methods was also comparable in 40 blood samples (r(2) = 0.994, slope = 1.014, intercept = 0.03). Intra-assay, interobserver, and interinstrument precision with this autofluorescence gating method exhibited low imprecision (coefficient of variation <14%).
Conclusion: This novel method is a more objective and less laborious alternative for F-cell quantitation by flow cytometry compared to using an isotype control or microscopy, thereby providing a more robust methodology for clinical studies and consideration as a laboratory reference method for F-cell counting.