Organizational cynicism: bases and consequences.

R Abraham
{"title":"Organizational cynicism: bases and consequences.","authors":"R Abraham","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Organizational cynicism is the belief that an organization lacks integrity, which, when coupled with a powerful negative emotional reaction, leads to disparaging and critical behavior. In this article, the author attempts to theoretically clarify the process by which five forms of cynicism develop in the workplace and to empirically relate them to affective outcomes. Societal, employee, and organizational change cynicisms may be attributed to psychological contract violations; work cynicism may be related to burnout; and person-role conflict and personality cynicism may be related to innate hostility. Empirically, personality cynicism emerged as the strongest predictor of organizational cynicism, adversely affecting all of the criteria. Other forms of cynicism had more selective effects. Organizational change cynicism induced job dissatisfaction and alienation, and employee cynicism affected organizational commitment. Societal cynicism actually increased both job satisfaction and commitment. Both personality and work cynicisms were related to organizational citizenship indirectly, through alienation. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":77145,"journal":{"name":"Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs","volume":"126 3","pages":"269-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Organizational cynicism is the belief that an organization lacks integrity, which, when coupled with a powerful negative emotional reaction, leads to disparaging and critical behavior. In this article, the author attempts to theoretically clarify the process by which five forms of cynicism develop in the workplace and to empirically relate them to affective outcomes. Societal, employee, and organizational change cynicisms may be attributed to psychological contract violations; work cynicism may be related to burnout; and person-role conflict and personality cynicism may be related to innate hostility. Empirically, personality cynicism emerged as the strongest predictor of organizational cynicism, adversely affecting all of the criteria. Other forms of cynicism had more selective effects. Organizational change cynicism induced job dissatisfaction and alienation, and employee cynicism affected organizational commitment. Societal cynicism actually increased both job satisfaction and commitment. Both personality and work cynicisms were related to organizational citizenship indirectly, through alienation. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
组织玩世不恭:基础和后果。
组织玩世不恭是认为组织缺乏诚信,当加上强烈的负面情绪反应时,会导致贬低和批评行为。在这篇文章中,作者试图从理论上阐明五种形式的玩世不恭在工作场所发展的过程,并从经验上将它们与情感结果联系起来。社会、员工和组织变革玩世不恭可能归因于心理契约的违反;玩世不恭可能与职业倦怠有关;人-角色冲突和人格玩世不恭可能与先天敌意有关。从经验上看,人格玩世不恭是组织玩世不恭的最强预测因子,对所有标准都有不利影响。其他形式的玩世不恭有更多的选择性影响。组织变革犬儒主义诱发工作不满和疏离感,员工犬儒主义影响组织承诺。社会冷嘲热讽实际上增加了工作满意度和工作投入。个性玩世不恭和工作玩世不恭都通过异化与组织公民间接相关。讨论了理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Psychologists versus psychologists: evaluating the claims of psychologists who publicly criticize their profession. Creativity, intelligence, and personality: a critical review of the scattered literature. Using epistemic ratios to evaluate hypotheses: an imprecision penalty for imprecise hypotheses. Measuring the value of nonwage employee benefits: building a model of the relation between benefit satisfaction and value. The cognition of deception: the role of executive processes in producing lies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1