Are pain disorder and somatization disorder valid diagnostic entities?

G M Aronoff, M Tota-Faucette, L Phillips, C N Lawrence
{"title":"Are pain disorder and somatization disorder valid diagnostic entities?","authors":"G M Aronoff,&nbsp;M Tota-Faucette,&nbsp;L Phillips,&nbsp;C N Lawrence","doi":"10.1007/s11916-000-0108-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Physicians and other clinicians who treat patients with chronic pain have doubtless recognized the interplay of various psychological and somatic variables in their patients' pain. Notwithstanding, there continues to be primary emphasis on the somatic factors, and continued neglect of the psychological. This article asserts that pain disorder and somatization disorder are indeed valid diagnostic entities, and that their respective incidence and prevalence are quite high both in patients with chronic pain and in the primary care setting. These diagnoses are compared and contrasted, along with the related diagnosis of the psychological factors affecting physical condition. Guidelines for assessment of these conditions are provided, as are recommendations as to when to refer patients for further psychological and psychiatric assessment and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":80271,"journal":{"name":"Current review of pain","volume":"4 4","pages":"309-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11916-000-0108-1","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current review of pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-000-0108-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Physicians and other clinicians who treat patients with chronic pain have doubtless recognized the interplay of various psychological and somatic variables in their patients' pain. Notwithstanding, there continues to be primary emphasis on the somatic factors, and continued neglect of the psychological. This article asserts that pain disorder and somatization disorder are indeed valid diagnostic entities, and that their respective incidence and prevalence are quite high both in patients with chronic pain and in the primary care setting. These diagnoses are compared and contrasted, along with the related diagnosis of the psychological factors affecting physical condition. Guidelines for assessment of these conditions are provided, as are recommendations as to when to refer patients for further psychological and psychiatric assessment and treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
疼痛障碍和躯体化障碍是有效的诊断实体吗?
治疗慢性疼痛患者的内科医生和其他临床医生无疑已经认识到各种心理和身体变量在患者疼痛中的相互作用。尽管如此,仍然主要强调身体因素,而继续忽视心理因素。本文认为疼痛障碍和躯体化障碍确实是有效的诊断实体,并且它们各自的发病率和患病率在慢性疼痛患者和初级保健环境中都相当高。对这些诊断进行比较和对比,以及影响身体状况的心理因素的相关诊断。提供了评估这些情况的指南,以及何时转介患者进行进一步的心理和精神评估和治疗的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Is the term "pain disorder" a valid diagnosis? Epidemic occupational pseudo-illness: the plague of acronyms. The debate over chronic pain continues Controversies surrounding reflex sympathetic dystrophy: a review article. Reflex sympathetic dystrophy: a sympathetically mediated pain syndrome or not?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1