Peer-based differences among boys with ADHD.

J B Hodgens, J Cole, J Boldizar
{"title":"Peer-based differences among boys with ADHD.","authors":"J B Hodgens,&nbsp;J Cole,&nbsp;J Boldizar","doi":"10.1207/S15374424JCCP2903_15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Examined the peer interactions and peer acceptance of three groups of boys ages 8 to 11 1/2 years: attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), predominantly inattentive type; ADHD, combined type; and nonclinical controls (N = 45). Peer nominations were obtained from each boy's classroom. Newly acquainted peers consisting of boys from each of the 3 groups were observed for 3 play sessions, after which peer nominations were obtained. Both ADHD groups were more likely than nonclinical controls to receive lower social preference scores from peers in the classroom but not in the play groups. In both settings, boys from the predominantly inattentive group were more likely to be nominated as very shy, whereas boys from the combined type group were more likely to be nominated for starting fights and arguments. Observations of the play group showed that boys from the predominantly inattentive group displayed a marked pattern of social withdrawal. The findings suggest that the peer rejection experienced by these 2 groups may result from very different social behavior patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":79502,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical child psychology","volume":"29 3","pages":"443-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1207/S15374424JCCP2903_15","citationCount":"175","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical child psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1207/S15374424JCCP2903_15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 175

Abstract

Examined the peer interactions and peer acceptance of three groups of boys ages 8 to 11 1/2 years: attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), predominantly inattentive type; ADHD, combined type; and nonclinical controls (N = 45). Peer nominations were obtained from each boy's classroom. Newly acquainted peers consisting of boys from each of the 3 groups were observed for 3 play sessions, after which peer nominations were obtained. Both ADHD groups were more likely than nonclinical controls to receive lower social preference scores from peers in the classroom but not in the play groups. In both settings, boys from the predominantly inattentive group were more likely to be nominated as very shy, whereas boys from the combined type group were more likely to be nominated for starting fights and arguments. Observations of the play group showed that boys from the predominantly inattentive group displayed a marked pattern of social withdrawal. The findings suggest that the peer rejection experienced by these 2 groups may result from very different social behavior patterns.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ADHD男孩的同龄人差异。
研究了3组8 ~ 11岁半男孩的同伴互动和同伴接受程度:注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD),主要是注意力不集中型;ADHD,混合型;和非临床对照(N = 45)。同学提名从每个男孩的班级中获得。新认识的同伴由来自三个组的男孩组成,观察三个游戏环节,之后获得同伴提名。两个多动症组比非临床对照组更有可能在课堂上从同伴那里获得较低的社会偏好分数,但在游戏组则不然。在这两种情况下,来自注意力不集中组的男孩更有可能被认为是非常害羞的,而来自混合型组的男孩更有可能被认为是开始打架和争吵的。对玩耍组的观察表明,注意力不集中组的男孩表现出明显的社交退缩模式。研究结果表明,这两组人的同伴排斥可能是由非常不同的社会行为模式造成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Novel strategies for relapsed/refractory DLBCL; navigating the immunotherapy era in aggressive lymphoma. Estimation of secondary cancer projected risk after partial breast irradiation at the 1.5 T MR-linac. Children's Responses to Overt and Relational Aggression Laboratory and performance-based measures of childhood disorders: introduction to the special section. Performance-based measures in autism: implications for diagnosis, early detection, and identification of cognitive profiles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1