The influence of residual high-frequency hearing on the outcome in congenitally deaf cochlear implant recipients.

The American journal of otology Pub Date : 2000-09-01
S C Kuo, W P Gibson
{"title":"The influence of residual high-frequency hearing on the outcome in congenitally deaf cochlear implant recipients.","authors":"S C Kuo,&nbsp;W P Gibson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To show that congenitally deaf children who receive a cochlear implant between 10 and 15 years of age find it significantly more difficult to learn the new signal, and that a history of sound detection at high frequencies with hearing aids is predictive of better outcomes in these children.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective study using a within-subjects design.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Children's Cochlear Implant Centre, Sydney (CCIC), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, and the New Children's Hospital in Westmead are tertiary referral centers.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Forty-five congenitally deaf patients were grouped according to their age (in years) at implantation into group 1 (aged 10-15), group 2 (aged <10), group 2a (aged 6-9), and group 2b (aged 3-5). Within each group, individuals with previous hearing between 2 and 4 kHz before receiving a cochlear implant were identified, and their mean results were compared with those in their respective age-matched groups.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Surgical implantation, intensive weekly habilitation at the CCIC.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Speech perception, speech production, and language measures were compared. Questionnaires and telephone interviews were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group 2 (age <10 years) consistently outperformed group 1 (10-15 years) on all outcome measures, and most of them learned to converse without lipreading. In group 1, children with previous aided hearing at high frequencies displayed exceptional gains in speech perception and speech production, with reduced dependence on lipreading. Previous high-frequency hearing does not benefit group 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implant recipients aged 10 to 15 years experience more difficulty than younger children during the initial periods of device use. A history of high-frequency hearing before implantation in these individuals correlates with more rapid improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":76596,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of otology","volume":"21 5","pages":"657-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of otology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To show that congenitally deaf children who receive a cochlear implant between 10 and 15 years of age find it significantly more difficult to learn the new signal, and that a history of sound detection at high frequencies with hearing aids is predictive of better outcomes in these children.

Study design: A retrospective study using a within-subjects design.

Setting: Children's Cochlear Implant Centre, Sydney (CCIC), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, and the New Children's Hospital in Westmead are tertiary referral centers.

Patients: Forty-five congenitally deaf patients were grouped according to their age (in years) at implantation into group 1 (aged 10-15), group 2 (aged <10), group 2a (aged 6-9), and group 2b (aged 3-5). Within each group, individuals with previous hearing between 2 and 4 kHz before receiving a cochlear implant were identified, and their mean results were compared with those in their respective age-matched groups.

Interventions: Surgical implantation, intensive weekly habilitation at the CCIC.

Main outcome measures: Speech perception, speech production, and language measures were compared. Questionnaires and telephone interviews were conducted.

Results: Group 2 (age <10 years) consistently outperformed group 1 (10-15 years) on all outcome measures, and most of them learned to converse without lipreading. In group 1, children with previous aided hearing at high frequencies displayed exceptional gains in speech perception and speech production, with reduced dependence on lipreading. Previous high-frequency hearing does not benefit group 2.

Conclusions: Implant recipients aged 10 to 15 years experience more difficulty than younger children during the initial periods of device use. A history of high-frequency hearing before implantation in these individuals correlates with more rapid improvement.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
残余高频听力对先天性耳聋人工耳蜗受者预后的影响。
目的:研究10 - 15岁接受人工耳蜗植入的先天性失聪儿童学习新信号的难度明显增加,使用助听器检测高频声音的历史预示着这些儿童的预后更好。研究设计:采用受试者内设计的回顾性研究。环境:悉尼儿童人工耳蜗中心(CCIC)、皇家阿尔弗雷德王子医院和韦斯特米德新儿童医院是三级转诊中心。患者:45例先天性耳聋患者根据其植入时的年龄(年)分为1组(10-15岁),2组(年龄)。干预措施:手术植入,每周在CCIC进行强化康复。主要结果测量:比较语音感知、语音产生和语言测量。进行了问卷调查和电话访谈。结果:组2(年龄)结论:10 - 15岁的种植体受者在设备使用的初始阶段比年幼的儿童经历更多的困难。在这些个体中,植入前有高频听力的病史与更快的改善相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Noise-induced hearing loss Petrous Apex Lesions Falls in patients with vestibular deficits. Osteomas of the internal auditory canal: a report of two cases. Effectiveness of conservative management of acoustic neuromas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1