Early abortion by mifepristone (RU 486) followed by vaginal gel (meteneprost) versus oral (misoprostol) prostaglandin.

Abstract

The present study was conducted to compare the therapeutic regimens of low-dose mifepristone (200 mg) plus vaginal meteneprost versus oral misoprostol in terms of efficacy and safety for medical termination of early pregnancy. A randomized clinical trial was conducted by the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi. A total of 101 subjects were enrolled within 56 days of amenorrhea. A single dose of 200 mg of mifepristone (RU 486) was given and, 48 hr later, prostaglandin was administered as either 5 mg of 9 methylene PGE2 vaginal gel, meteneprost (classified as group I) or 600 microg of oral PGE1 derivative misoprostol (classified as group II). In group I, 50 subjects and in group II, 51 subjects were treated with the respective schedule. The success rate with mifepristone + misoprostol (group II) was 88.63% which was significantly higher than that with mifepristone + meteneprost (group I) which was 82% (p < 0.05). The average duration of bleeding in cases with complete abortion was 8.95+/-5.67 and 9.77+/-6.51 in group I and II, respectively. There were no serious side-effects. Only one subject in group I (2%) required blood transfusion for heavy bleeding. This study indicated that oral prostaglandin after a low dose of mifepristone (200 mg) could be developed into an effective method to terminate early pregnancy. Oral administration of both drugs would be a more convenient, feasible, private and acceptable regimen.