The role of radiofrequency in failed back surgery patients.

M E Sluijter
{"title":"The role of radiofrequency in failed back surgery patients.","authors":"M E Sluijter","doi":"10.1007/s11916-000-0009-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are a multitude of potential causes for both residual leg pain and residual back pain following surgery. In a minority of patients there may be pathology from an adjoining segment or recurrence of the preoperatively existent anatomic abnormality. In many others surgery fails because the damage was already irreparable by the time the anatomic abnormality was corrected. In residual leg pain this is due to radiculopathy, with or without centralization into the dorsal horn. In residual back pain inflammation or scar formation in the anterior epidural space plays a major role. The role of radiofrequency (RF) has been limited for two reasons. First, because RF is destructive in nature, it is contraindicated in the treatment of neuropathic pain. Second, the anterior epidural space is innervated by the sinuvertebral nerve, which runs too close to the main segmental nerve to apply RF safely. Recently the concept of heat as being the primary active factor in RF lesions has come under discussion and has led to the development of pulsed RF (PRF), which is a nondestructive method of exposing tissue to RF electric fields. Because PRF is nondestructive, it is potentially suitable for the treatment of neuropathic pain and it can also be applied at the origin of the sinuvertebral nerve. The initial clinical results have been promising, but controlled studies are still lacking.</p>","PeriodicalId":80271,"journal":{"name":"Current review of pain","volume":"4 1","pages":"49-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11916-000-0009-3","citationCount":"61","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current review of pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-000-0009-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 61

Abstract

There are a multitude of potential causes for both residual leg pain and residual back pain following surgery. In a minority of patients there may be pathology from an adjoining segment or recurrence of the preoperatively existent anatomic abnormality. In many others surgery fails because the damage was already irreparable by the time the anatomic abnormality was corrected. In residual leg pain this is due to radiculopathy, with or without centralization into the dorsal horn. In residual back pain inflammation or scar formation in the anterior epidural space plays a major role. The role of radiofrequency (RF) has been limited for two reasons. First, because RF is destructive in nature, it is contraindicated in the treatment of neuropathic pain. Second, the anterior epidural space is innervated by the sinuvertebral nerve, which runs too close to the main segmental nerve to apply RF safely. Recently the concept of heat as being the primary active factor in RF lesions has come under discussion and has led to the development of pulsed RF (PRF), which is a nondestructive method of exposing tissue to RF electric fields. Because PRF is nondestructive, it is potentially suitable for the treatment of neuropathic pain and it can also be applied at the origin of the sinuvertebral nerve. The initial clinical results have been promising, but controlled studies are still lacking.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
射频在背部手术失败患者中的作用。
手术后残留的腿痛和背部疼痛有很多潜在的原因。少数患者可能有临近节段的病理或术前存在的解剖异常复发。在许多其他手术失败的情况下,因为当解剖异常被纠正时,损伤已经无法修复。残余腿痛是由神经根病引起的,有或没有集中到背角。在残余背痛中,硬膜外腔前部的炎症或瘢痕形成起主要作用。由于两个原因,射频(RF)的作用受到限制。首先,由于射频本质上是破坏性的,因此它禁忌用于神经性疼痛的治疗。其次,前硬膜外间隙受椎弓神经支配,椎弓神经离主节段神经太近,不能安全应用射频。最近,热作为射频损伤的主要活性因素的概念得到了讨论,并导致了脉冲射频(PRF)的发展,这是一种将组织暴露于射频电场的非破坏性方法。由于PRF是非破坏性的,它可能适用于神经性疼痛的治疗,它也可以应用于脊椎神经的起源。最初的临床结果令人鼓舞,但仍缺乏对照研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Is the term "pain disorder" a valid diagnosis? Epidemic occupational pseudo-illness: the plague of acronyms. The debate over chronic pain continues Controversies surrounding reflex sympathetic dystrophy: a review article. Reflex sympathetic dystrophy: a sympathetically mediated pain syndrome or not?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1