Comparative study on the acceptability of two modern monophasic oral contraceptive preparations: 30 microgram ethinyl estradiol combined with 150 microgram desogestrel or 75 microgram gestodene.

L Zichella, C Sbrignadello, A Tomassini, A Di Lieto, C Montoneri, G Zarbo, M Mancone, P Pietrobattista, G Bertoli, G Perrone
{"title":"Comparative study on the acceptability of two modern monophasic oral contraceptive preparations: 30 microgram ethinyl estradiol combined with 150 microgram desogestrel or 75 microgram gestodene.","authors":"L Zichella,&nbsp;C Sbrignadello,&nbsp;A Tomassini,&nbsp;A Di Lieto,&nbsp;C Montoneri,&nbsp;G Zarbo,&nbsp;M Mancone,&nbsp;P Pietrobattista,&nbsp;G Bertoli,&nbsp;G Perrone","doi":"10.1023/a:1006745315344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cycle control and tolerability of two monophasic oral contraceptive pills containing 30 microg ethinyl estradiol (EE) with either 150 microg desogestrel (DSG) or 75 microg gestodene (GSD) were compared in women starting oral contraception. A minimum of 200 healthy women at risk for pregnancy were to be treated for a total of 6 cycles per patient in a prospective, randomized open parallel-group multicenter trial. Two hundred and forty-one subjects were randomized, 115 to DSG/EE and 126 to GSD/EE. Compliance to the study preparation was high (around 95%) in both groups and no pregnancies occurred during the study. Cycle control was excellent; there were no differences between the two groups with regard to incidence of spotting and breakthrough bleeding or duration and intensity of withdrawal bleeding. Side-effects were mild and in general comparable in the two groups. Both at baseline and during treatment, a higher proportion of women taking GSD/EE complained about breast tenderness. This resulted in more early withdrawals because of breast tenderness in the GSD/EE group. It was concluded that monophasic DSG/EE and GSD/EE are equally effective, have similar cycle control and both are generally well tolerated.</p>","PeriodicalId":76977,"journal":{"name":"Advances in contraception : the official journal of the Society for the Advancement of Contraception","volume":"15 3","pages":"191-200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1023/a:1006745315344","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in contraception : the official journal of the Society for the Advancement of Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1006745315344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Cycle control and tolerability of two monophasic oral contraceptive pills containing 30 microg ethinyl estradiol (EE) with either 150 microg desogestrel (DSG) or 75 microg gestodene (GSD) were compared in women starting oral contraception. A minimum of 200 healthy women at risk for pregnancy were to be treated for a total of 6 cycles per patient in a prospective, randomized open parallel-group multicenter trial. Two hundred and forty-one subjects were randomized, 115 to DSG/EE and 126 to GSD/EE. Compliance to the study preparation was high (around 95%) in both groups and no pregnancies occurred during the study. Cycle control was excellent; there were no differences between the two groups with regard to incidence of spotting and breakthrough bleeding or duration and intensity of withdrawal bleeding. Side-effects were mild and in general comparable in the two groups. Both at baseline and during treatment, a higher proportion of women taking GSD/EE complained about breast tenderness. This resulted in more early withdrawals because of breast tenderness in the GSD/EE group. It was concluded that monophasic DSG/EE and GSD/EE are equally effective, have similar cycle control and both are generally well tolerated.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
30微克乙炔雌二醇联合150微克地沙孕酮和75微克孕酮两种现代单相口服避孕药可接受性的比较研究。
在开始口服避孕药的妇女中,比较了含有30毫克炔雌醇(EE)和150毫克地孕酮(DSG)或75毫克地孕酮(GSD)的两种单相口服避孕药的周期控制和耐受性。在一项前瞻性、随机、开放平行组多中心试验中,至少200名有妊娠风险的健康妇女接受每名患者总共6个周期的治疗。241名受试者被随机分配,其中115名为DSG/EE组,126名为GSD/EE组。两组对研究准备的依从性都很高(约95%),研究期间没有发生怀孕。周期控制优良;两组在点状出血和突破性出血的发生率、退断性出血的持续时间和强度方面没有差异。两组的副作用轻微,大体相当。在基线和治疗期间,服用GSD/EE的妇女抱怨乳房压痛的比例较高。这导致GSD/EE组由于乳房压痛而更多的早期停药。综上所述,单相DSG/EE和GSD/EE的疗效相同,周期控制相似,且均具有良好的耐受性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nota editorial Workshop papers Free communications 1 Free communications 2 Free communications 3
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1