Detecting symptoms of alcohol abuse in primary care settings.

W H McQuade, S M Levy, L R Yanek, S W Davis, M R Liepman
{"title":"Detecting symptoms of alcohol abuse in primary care settings.","authors":"W H McQuade,&nbsp;S M Levy,&nbsp;L R Yanek,&nbsp;S W Davis,&nbsp;M R Liepman","doi":"10.1001/archfami.9.9.814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies on alcohol abuse are frequently based on patients who meet minimum diagnostic criteria, thus ignoring patients with individual symptoms of harmful or hazardous use. Consequently, we are unable to characterize alcohol-abusing patients with sufficient clarity to effectively focus screening for primary prevention.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the prevalence of harmful and hazardous use of alcohol, assess screening instruments for detecting alcohol abuse or dependence, and assess the impact of alcohol use on other diagnoses treated in outpatient settings.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Survey (cross-sectional study).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Hospital-based outpatient clinic.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Three hundred randomly selected adults (aged 18 years and older).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Diagnosis of alcohol abuse or dependence based on the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 18% met DSM-IV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition) criteria of abuse or dependence while almost 50% had at least one symptom of harmful or hazardous use. The T-ACE questionnaire, a modified version of the CAGE questionnaire, was the most effective screening instrument for both men and women. Selected diagnoses, personal characteristics such as family history of alcohol abuse, and self-reported patterns of alcohol use could identify patients likely to meet diagnostic criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Many symptoms of substance use disorders are not adequately addressed in outpatient practice. Little is known about how alcohol use in varying quantities affects health care utilization and treatment of conditions commonly seen in outpatient medicine. Consequently, we lack a full appreciation of the burden of disease borne by alcohol use and have yet to achieve a universally accepted method of approaching primary and secondary prevention of alcohol-related problems.</p>","PeriodicalId":8295,"journal":{"name":"Archives of family medicine","volume":"9 9","pages":"814-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"59","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of family medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archfami.9.9.814","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 59

Abstract

Background: Studies on alcohol abuse are frequently based on patients who meet minimum diagnostic criteria, thus ignoring patients with individual symptoms of harmful or hazardous use. Consequently, we are unable to characterize alcohol-abusing patients with sufficient clarity to effectively focus screening for primary prevention.

Objective: To determine the prevalence of harmful and hazardous use of alcohol, assess screening instruments for detecting alcohol abuse or dependence, and assess the impact of alcohol use on other diagnoses treated in outpatient settings.

Design: Survey (cross-sectional study).

Setting: Hospital-based outpatient clinic.

Participants: Three hundred randomly selected adults (aged 18 years and older).

Main outcome measure: Diagnosis of alcohol abuse or dependence based on the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS).

Results: About 18% met DSM-IV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition) criteria of abuse or dependence while almost 50% had at least one symptom of harmful or hazardous use. The T-ACE questionnaire, a modified version of the CAGE questionnaire, was the most effective screening instrument for both men and women. Selected diagnoses, personal characteristics such as family history of alcohol abuse, and self-reported patterns of alcohol use could identify patients likely to meet diagnostic criteria.

Conclusions: Many symptoms of substance use disorders are not adequately addressed in outpatient practice. Little is known about how alcohol use in varying quantities affects health care utilization and treatment of conditions commonly seen in outpatient medicine. Consequently, we lack a full appreciation of the burden of disease borne by alcohol use and have yet to achieve a universally accepted method of approaching primary and secondary prevention of alcohol-related problems.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在初级保健机构检测酒精滥用症状。
背景:关于酒精滥用的研究通常是基于满足最低诊断标准的患者,从而忽略了具有有害或危险使用个体症状的患者。因此,我们无法充分明确酒精滥用患者的特征,从而有效地集中筛查进行一级预防。目的:确定有害和危险使用酒精的患病率,评估检测酒精滥用或依赖的筛查工具,并评估酒精使用对门诊治疗的其他诊断的影响。设计:调查(横断面研究)。地点:医院门诊。参与者:随机选择300名成年人(18岁及以上)。主要结果测量:基于诊断访谈表(DIS)的酒精滥用或依赖诊断。结果:约18%的人符合DSM-IV(精神障碍诊断与统计手册,第四版)滥用或依赖的标准,而近50%的人至少有一种有害或危险使用的症状。T-ACE问卷是CAGE问卷的改良版,对男性和女性都是最有效的筛查工具。选定的诊断、个人特征(如酒精滥用家族史)和自我报告的酒精使用模式可以确定可能符合诊断标准的患者。结论:药物使用障碍的许多症状在门诊实践中没有得到充分解决。对于不同数量的酒精使用如何影响医疗保健的利用和门诊医学中常见的疾病的治疗,人们知之甚少。因此,我们没有充分认识到酒精使用所带来的疾病负担,也尚未找到一种普遍接受的方法来处理与酒精有关的问题的一级和二级预防。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Human papillomavirus infection. Walking the line. A Short Collection of Fables for Learning the Fundamental Principles of Family Medicine: Chapter 1. Comprehensiveness, Continuity, Contextualization and Family Clues to early Alzheimer dementia in the outpatient setting. Competing demands from physical problems: effect on initiating and completing depression care over 6 months.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1