Vaginal fluid creatinine, human chorionic gonadotropin and alpha-fetoprotein levels for detecting premature rupture of membranes.

H Y Li, T S Chang
{"title":"Vaginal fluid creatinine, human chorionic gonadotropin and alpha-fetoprotein levels for detecting premature rupture of membranes.","authors":"H Y Li,&nbsp;T S Chang","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diagnosis of premature rupture of membranes (PROM) is difficult in equivocal cases. The concentrations of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and creatinine are high in amniotic fluid. The purpose of this study was to determine the usefulness of vaginal fluid hCG, AFP and creatinine measurements in the detection of PROM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>About 3 ml of normal saline was used to irrigate the posterior vaginal fornix and was collected for the measurement of hCG, AFP and creatinine. The control group included 10 normal pregnant women in the third trimester (> 28 weeks of gestational age). Levels of hCG, AFP and creatinine were compared with those of 10 women with confirmed PROM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median levels of vaginal fluid hCG of normal pregnant women and pregnant women with confirmed PROM were 35.0 mIU/ml and 478.0 mIU/ml (p = 0.0046), respectively. For AFP, the corresponding values were 0.80 ng/ml and 54.24 ng/ml (p < 0.0001), respectively, and for creatinine, the values were 0.05 mg/dl and 0.95 mg/dl (p < 0.0001), respectively. All three markers were significantly higher in the experimental group than in the control group. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy for hCG were 80%, 70%, 72.7%, 77.8% and 75%, respectively. For AFP, these values were 90%, 100%, 100%, 90.9%, and 95.0%, respectively, and for creatinine, they were 90%, 100%, 100%, 90.9%, and 95%, respectively. The diagnostic value of AFP or creatinine level in vaginal washing may be better than that of hCG, though the difference was not statistically significant, probably due to the limited case number.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Creatinine in vaginal fluid washings is a useful marker for PROM. It was less expensive and easier to measure than hCG and AFP, and appears to be more accurate than hCG.</p>","PeriodicalId":24073,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi = Chinese medical journal; Free China ed","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi = Chinese medical journal; Free China ed","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diagnosis of premature rupture of membranes (PROM) is difficult in equivocal cases. The concentrations of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and creatinine are high in amniotic fluid. The purpose of this study was to determine the usefulness of vaginal fluid hCG, AFP and creatinine measurements in the detection of PROM.

Methods: About 3 ml of normal saline was used to irrigate the posterior vaginal fornix and was collected for the measurement of hCG, AFP and creatinine. The control group included 10 normal pregnant women in the third trimester (> 28 weeks of gestational age). Levels of hCG, AFP and creatinine were compared with those of 10 women with confirmed PROM.

Results: The median levels of vaginal fluid hCG of normal pregnant women and pregnant women with confirmed PROM were 35.0 mIU/ml and 478.0 mIU/ml (p = 0.0046), respectively. For AFP, the corresponding values were 0.80 ng/ml and 54.24 ng/ml (p < 0.0001), respectively, and for creatinine, the values were 0.05 mg/dl and 0.95 mg/dl (p < 0.0001), respectively. All three markers were significantly higher in the experimental group than in the control group. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy for hCG were 80%, 70%, 72.7%, 77.8% and 75%, respectively. For AFP, these values were 90%, 100%, 100%, 90.9%, and 95.0%, respectively, and for creatinine, they were 90%, 100%, 100%, 90.9%, and 95%, respectively. The diagnostic value of AFP or creatinine level in vaginal washing may be better than that of hCG, though the difference was not statistically significant, probably due to the limited case number.

Conclusions: Creatinine in vaginal fluid washings is a useful marker for PROM. It was less expensive and easier to measure than hCG and AFP, and appears to be more accurate than hCG.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阴道液肌酐、人绒毛膜促性腺激素和甲胎蛋白水平检测胎膜早破。
背景:在模棱两可的病例中诊断胎膜早破(PROM)是困难的。人绒毛膜促性腺激素(hCG)、甲胎蛋白(AFP)和肌酐在羊水中浓度较高。本研究的目的是确定阴道液hCG、AFP和肌酐测量在早膜PROM检测中的有效性。方法:取生理盐水约3 ml冲洗阴道后穹窿,测定hCG、AFP、肌酐。对照组为10例妊娠晚期(> 28孕周)的正常孕妇。比较10例确诊胎膜早破的妇女的hCG、AFP和肌酐水平。结果:正常孕妇和确诊胎膜早破孕妇阴道液hCG的中位水平分别为35.0 mIU/ml和478.0 mIU/ml (p = 0.0046)。AFP分别为0.80和54.24 ng/ml (p < 0.0001),肌酐分别为0.05 mg/dl和0.95 mg/dl (p < 0.0001)。实验组三种指标均显著高于对照组。hCG的敏感性为80%,特异性为70%,阳性预测值为72.7%,阴性预测值为77.8%,准确性为75%。对于AFP,这些值分别为90%,100%,100%,90.9%和95.0%,对于肌酐,它们分别为90%,100%,100%,90.9%和95%。阴道冲洗中AFP或肌酐水平的诊断价值可能优于hCG,但差异无统计学意义,可能与病例数有限有关。结论:阴道洗液肌酐是胎膜早破的有效指标。它比hCG和AFP更便宜,更容易测量,而且似乎比hCG更准确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia. Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Congenital muscular dystrophy. Autoimmune hepatitis: truly a rare disorder in Taiwan. Characteristics of autoimmune hepatitis in Taiwan: the 11 years' experiences of a medical center.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1