{"title":"The theory of treating Type 2 diabetes.","authors":"M Nattrass","doi":"10.1038/sj.ijo.0801419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a chronic, progressive disease affecting many millions of people worldwide. It carries a great burden of morbidity and premature mortality for the individual, and places great demands on healthcare systems and resources. We now know from clinical studies that improved control of Type 2 diabetes can to some degree reduce its burden. We also know that in the context of a clinical trial, the treatments available to us can do much to improve control in many patients (although all will fall short of 'normality'). International guidelines for management of Type 2 diabetes, quite correctly, encourage us to strive for levels of control where we believe the risk of complications is lowest. But is this happening in everyday practice? Data from a survey in three countries show that there is a great difference between the theory of diabetes care and the reality of clinical practice, with levels of glycaemic control in most patients falling short of desired levels. A consideration of the pathophysiology of Type 2 diabetes reveals that it is a complex syndrome focussing on the progressive failure of the pancreatic beta-cell. By acknowledging this fact, and addressing our therapeutic efforts appropriately, we may help to span the gap between theory and reality.</p>","PeriodicalId":14227,"journal":{"name":"International journal of obesity and related metabolic disorders : journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity","volume":"24 Suppl 3 ","pages":"S2-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1038/sj.ijo.0801419","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of obesity and related metabolic disorders : journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0801419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a chronic, progressive disease affecting many millions of people worldwide. It carries a great burden of morbidity and premature mortality for the individual, and places great demands on healthcare systems and resources. We now know from clinical studies that improved control of Type 2 diabetes can to some degree reduce its burden. We also know that in the context of a clinical trial, the treatments available to us can do much to improve control in many patients (although all will fall short of 'normality'). International guidelines for management of Type 2 diabetes, quite correctly, encourage us to strive for levels of control where we believe the risk of complications is lowest. But is this happening in everyday practice? Data from a survey in three countries show that there is a great difference between the theory of diabetes care and the reality of clinical practice, with levels of glycaemic control in most patients falling short of desired levels. A consideration of the pathophysiology of Type 2 diabetes reveals that it is a complex syndrome focussing on the progressive failure of the pancreatic beta-cell. By acknowledging this fact, and addressing our therapeutic efforts appropriately, we may help to span the gap between theory and reality.