Comparative study of timolol gel versus timolol solution for patients with glaucoma.

S H Chiou, W M Hsu, J H Liu, J L Liu, M R Chen, D C Tsai, C K Chou
{"title":"Comparative study of timolol gel versus timolol solution for patients with glaucoma.","authors":"S H Chiou,&nbsp;W M Hsu,&nbsp;J H Liu,&nbsp;J L Liu,&nbsp;M R Chen,&nbsp;D C Tsai,&nbsp;C K Chou","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The timolol gel was developed for the simplification of multi-dose medications for glaucoma patients. This gel can be used once per day instead of twice per day of the aqueous form. It is necessary to understand the clinical effects of intraocular pressure maintained in glaucoma by there two forms of timolol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-two eligible patients were included and completed the 12-week study. In this randomized, open-label, two-period crossover study design, patients received either the gel form of 0.5% timolol once daily or the aqueous form of 0.5% timolol twice daily for the first 6 weeks, then crossed over to the other treatment form for the remaining 6 weeks. Intraocular pressure was measured at baseline, week 6 and week 12 at the end of the treatment period. The incidences of all the adverse events were recorded and summarized in each follow-up visit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant difference in intraocular pressure was observed between the two different control treatment groups (p>0.05). However, stickiness and transient blurred vision was reported more often by patients using the gel form than the aqueous form of timolol.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The gel form of 0.5% timolol used once daily offers a new alternative that is probably more convenient than the aqueous form of 0.5% timolol given twice daily in maintaining the intraocular pressure of patients with glaucoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":24073,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi = Chinese medical journal; Free China ed","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi = Chinese medical journal; Free China ed","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The timolol gel was developed for the simplification of multi-dose medications for glaucoma patients. This gel can be used once per day instead of twice per day of the aqueous form. It is necessary to understand the clinical effects of intraocular pressure maintained in glaucoma by there two forms of timolol.

Methods: Fifty-two eligible patients were included and completed the 12-week study. In this randomized, open-label, two-period crossover study design, patients received either the gel form of 0.5% timolol once daily or the aqueous form of 0.5% timolol twice daily for the first 6 weeks, then crossed over to the other treatment form for the remaining 6 weeks. Intraocular pressure was measured at baseline, week 6 and week 12 at the end of the treatment period. The incidences of all the adverse events were recorded and summarized in each follow-up visit.

Results: No statistically significant difference in intraocular pressure was observed between the two different control treatment groups (p>0.05). However, stickiness and transient blurred vision was reported more often by patients using the gel form than the aqueous form of timolol.

Conclusions: The gel form of 0.5% timolol used once daily offers a new alternative that is probably more convenient than the aqueous form of 0.5% timolol given twice daily in maintaining the intraocular pressure of patients with glaucoma.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
替洛尔凝胶与替洛尔溶液治疗青光眼的比较研究。
背景:替马洛尔凝胶是为简化青光眼患者的多剂量药物治疗而研制的。这种凝胶可以每天使用一次,而不是每天两次的水形式。了解两种噻莫洛尔维持青光眼眼压的临床效果是很有必要的。方法:纳入52例符合条件的患者并完成为期12周的研究。在这个随机、开放标签、两期交叉研究设计中,患者在前6周接受0.5%噻洛尔凝胶形式每日一次或0.5%噻洛尔水溶液形式每日两次,然后在剩下的6周中切换到另一种治疗形式。在治疗期结束时,分别在基线、第6周和第12周测量眼压。在每次随访中记录并总结所有不良事件的发生情况。结果:两组患者眼压差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。然而,使用凝胶形式的患者比使用水形式的替马洛尔的患者更常报告粘连和短暂性视力模糊。结论:在维持青光眼患者眼压方面,每日1次的0.5%噻洛尔凝胶剂型可能比每日2次的0.5%噻洛尔水剂型更为方便。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia. Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Congenital muscular dystrophy. Autoimmune hepatitis: truly a rare disorder in Taiwan. Characteristics of autoimmune hepatitis in Taiwan: the 11 years' experiences of a medical center.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1