The retrosigmoid approach for auditory brainstem implantation.

The American journal of otology Pub Date : 2000-11-01
V Colletti, F G Fiorino, M Carner, N Giarbini, L Sacchetto, G Cumer
{"title":"The retrosigmoid approach for auditory brainstem implantation.","authors":"V Colletti,&nbsp;F G Fiorino,&nbsp;M Carner,&nbsp;N Giarbini,&nbsp;L Sacchetto,&nbsp;G Cumer","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe our experience with the retrosigmoid-transmeatal (RS-TM) approach in auditory brainstem implantation (ABI) as well as the anatomosurgical guidelines for this route.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective case review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Ear, Nose, and Throat Department of the University of Verona.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Five patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) were operated on for vestibular schwannoma removal with ABI implantation from April 1997 to June 1999. The patients were four men and one woman, whose ages ranged from 22 to 37 years. The tumor sizes ranged from 12 to 30 mm. The records of a total of 179 patients operated on for vestibular schwannoma (VS) removal via the RS-TM approach from January 1990 to June 1999 were also evaluated. Their ages ranged from 18 to 88 years (average 54 years). The tumor sizes ranged from 4 to 50 mm. Five patients had a solitary VS in the only hearing ear.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The classic RS-TM approach was used in all patients. After tumor excision, for ABI implantation, the landmarks (seventh, eighth, and ninth cranial nerves, choroid plexus) for the foramen of Luschka were carefully identified. The choroid plexus was then partially removed, and the tela choroidea was divided and bent back. The floor of the lateral recess of the fourth ventricle and the convolution of the dorsal cochlear nucleus became visible. The electrode array was then inserted into the lateral recess and correctly positioned with the aid of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABRs).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Intraoperative EABR and postoperative speech perception evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Auditory sensations were induced in all patients with various numbers of electrodes. Different pitch sensations could be identified with different electrode stimulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the authors' experience, the RS-TM approach is the route of choice for patients who are candidates for ABI when there is a chance of hearing preservation during surgery. If auditory function is lost during surgery, anatomical preservation of the cochlear nerve may allow hearing restoration with a cochlear implant. Direct intraoperative recording of cochlear nerve action potentials (CNAPs) and round window electrical stimulation are mandatory for these purposes. In addition, decompression of the intrameatal portion of the vestibular schwannoma and planned partial tumor resection with hearing preservation are also possible with the RS-TM approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":76596,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of otology","volume":"21 6","pages":"826-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of otology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To describe our experience with the retrosigmoid-transmeatal (RS-TM) approach in auditory brainstem implantation (ABI) as well as the anatomosurgical guidelines for this route.

Study design: Retrospective case review.

Setting: Ear, Nose, and Throat Department of the University of Verona.

Patients: Five patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) were operated on for vestibular schwannoma removal with ABI implantation from April 1997 to June 1999. The patients were four men and one woman, whose ages ranged from 22 to 37 years. The tumor sizes ranged from 12 to 30 mm. The records of a total of 179 patients operated on for vestibular schwannoma (VS) removal via the RS-TM approach from January 1990 to June 1999 were also evaluated. Their ages ranged from 18 to 88 years (average 54 years). The tumor sizes ranged from 4 to 50 mm. Five patients had a solitary VS in the only hearing ear.

Intervention: The classic RS-TM approach was used in all patients. After tumor excision, for ABI implantation, the landmarks (seventh, eighth, and ninth cranial nerves, choroid plexus) for the foramen of Luschka were carefully identified. The choroid plexus was then partially removed, and the tela choroidea was divided and bent back. The floor of the lateral recess of the fourth ventricle and the convolution of the dorsal cochlear nucleus became visible. The electrode array was then inserted into the lateral recess and correctly positioned with the aid of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABRs).

Main outcome measures: Intraoperative EABR and postoperative speech perception evaluation.

Results: Auditory sensations were induced in all patients with various numbers of electrodes. Different pitch sensations could be identified with different electrode stimulation.

Conclusions: In the authors' experience, the RS-TM approach is the route of choice for patients who are candidates for ABI when there is a chance of hearing preservation during surgery. If auditory function is lost during surgery, anatomical preservation of the cochlear nerve may allow hearing restoration with a cochlear implant. Direct intraoperative recording of cochlear nerve action potentials (CNAPs) and round window electrical stimulation are mandatory for these purposes. In addition, decompression of the intrameatal portion of the vestibular schwannoma and planned partial tumor resection with hearing preservation are also possible with the RS-TM approach.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乙状窦后入路在听觉脑干植入术中的应用。
目的:总结经乙状窦后经颅(RS-TM)入路在听性脑干植入术中的应用经验,并提出该入路的解剖外科指导原则。研究设计:回顾性病例回顾。单位:维罗纳大学耳鼻喉科。患者:自1997年4月至1999年6月对5例2型神经纤维瘤病(NF2)行前庭神经鞘瘤切除联合ABI植入术。患者为4男1女,年龄22 ~ 37岁。肿瘤大小为12 ~ 30mm。对1990年1月至1999年6月间179例经RS-TM入路行前庭神经鞘瘤切除术的患者进行了回顾性分析。年龄从18岁到88岁不等(平均54岁)。肿瘤大小为4 ~ 50mm。5例患者在唯一能听的耳朵有孤立性VS。干预:所有患者均采用经典RS-TM方法。肿瘤切除后,进行ABI植入,仔细识别Luschka孔的标志(第七、第八、第九脑神经、脉络丛)。然后部分切除脉络膜丛,将脉络膜末梢分开并向后弯曲。可见第四脑室外侧隐窝底和耳蜗核背侧的褶积。然后将电极阵列插入侧隐窝并在电诱发听觉脑干反应(EABRs)的帮助下正确定位。主要观察指标:术中EABR和术后语音感知评价。结果:不同数量的电极均能诱导患者产生听觉。不同的电极刺激可以识别不同的音高感觉。结论:根据作者的经验,RS-TM入路是ABI患者在手术中有听力保留机会时的首选途径。如果在手术中听力功能丧失,解剖保存的耳蜗神经可能允许耳蜗植入恢复听力。术中直接记录耳蜗神经动作电位(CNAPs)和圆窗电刺激是必须的。此外,RS-TM入路还可以对前庭神经鞘瘤的孔内部分进行减压,并计划部分切除并保留听力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Noise-induced hearing loss Petrous Apex Lesions Falls in patients with vestibular deficits. Osteomas of the internal auditory canal: a report of two cases. Effectiveness of conservative management of acoustic neuromas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1