[Ethics and genetic diagnosis].

A Bondolfi
{"title":"[Ethics and genetic diagnosis].","authors":"A Bondolfi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The implications of current ethical concerns in the field of genetic research and applications are discussed. Genetic diagnosis is perceived as ethically ambivalent both in general and in its individual applications. Genetic testing, by inviting participation, reflects this ambivalence and can be taken as the basis for both a \"right to know\" and a \"right not to know\". The connection between prenatal diagnosis and abortion is also complex and cannot be regarded as ethically clearcut. In these circumstances the legislator must exercise caution in regulating genetic diagnosis in its present state of development.</p>","PeriodicalId":21484,"journal":{"name":"Schweizerische medizinische Wochenschrift","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schweizerische medizinische Wochenschrift","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The implications of current ethical concerns in the field of genetic research and applications are discussed. Genetic diagnosis is perceived as ethically ambivalent both in general and in its individual applications. Genetic testing, by inviting participation, reflects this ambivalence and can be taken as the basis for both a "right to know" and a "right not to know". The connection between prenatal diagnosis and abortion is also complex and cannot be regarded as ethically clearcut. In these circumstances the legislator must exercise caution in regulating genetic diagnosis in its present state of development.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[伦理与基因诊断]。
讨论了当前基因研究和应用领域的伦理问题的含义。遗传诊断被认为在伦理上是矛盾的,无论是在一般情况下还是在其个人应用中。邀请参与的基因检测反映了这种矛盾心理,可以作为“知情权”和“不知情权”的基础。产前诊断和堕胎之间的联系也很复杂,不能被认为是道德上明确的。在这种情况下,立法者在规范基因诊断目前的发展状态时必须谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of focal liver lesions in non-cirrhotic liver – expert opinion statement by the Swiss Association for the Study of the Liver and the Swiss Society of Gastroenterology [Postpartum depression]. [Congenital atransferrinemia]. [Neuroendocrine carcinoma]. [Heart transplantation].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1