E H Lin, M VonKorff, J Russo, W Katon, G E Simon, J Unützer, T Bush, E Walker, E Ludman
{"title":"Can depression treatment in primary care reduce disability? A stepped care approach.","authors":"E H Lin, M VonKorff, J Russo, W Katon, G E Simon, J Unützer, T Bush, E Walker, E Ludman","doi":"10.1001/archfami.9.10.1052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess effects of stepped collaborative care depression intervention on disability.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Four primary care clinics of a large health maintenance organization.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Two hundred twenty-eight patients with either 4 or more persistent major depressive symptoms or a score of 1.5 or greater on the Hopkins Symptom Checklist. Depression items were randomized to stepped care intervention or usual care 6 to 8 weeks after initiating antidepressant medication.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Augmented treatment of persistently depressed patients by an on-site psychiatrist collaborating with primary care physicians. Treatment included patient education, adjustment of pharmacotherapy, and proactive monitoring of outcomes.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Baseline, 1-, 3-, and 6-month assessments of the Sheehan Disability Scale and the social function and role limitation subscales of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients who received the depression intervention experienced less interference in their family, work, and social activities than patients receiving usual primary care (Sheehan Disability Scale, z = 2.23; P =.025). Patients receiving intervention also reported a trend toward more improvement in SF-36-defined social functioning than patients receiving usual care (z = 1.63, P =.10), but there was no significant difference in role performance (z = 0.07, P =.94).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant disability accompanied depression in this persistently depressed group. The stepped care intervention resulted in small to moderate functional improvements for these primary care patients. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:1052-1058</p>","PeriodicalId":8295,"journal":{"name":"Archives of family medicine","volume":"9 10","pages":"1052-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"120","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of family medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archfami.9.10.1052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 120
Abstract
Objective: To assess effects of stepped collaborative care depression intervention on disability.
Design: Randomized controlled trial.
Setting: Four primary care clinics of a large health maintenance organization.
Patients: Two hundred twenty-eight patients with either 4 or more persistent major depressive symptoms or a score of 1.5 or greater on the Hopkins Symptom Checklist. Depression items were randomized to stepped care intervention or usual care 6 to 8 weeks after initiating antidepressant medication.
Intervention: Augmented treatment of persistently depressed patients by an on-site psychiatrist collaborating with primary care physicians. Treatment included patient education, adjustment of pharmacotherapy, and proactive monitoring of outcomes.
Main outcome measures: Baseline, 1-, 3-, and 6-month assessments of the Sheehan Disability Scale and the social function and role limitation subscales of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36).
Results: Patients who received the depression intervention experienced less interference in their family, work, and social activities than patients receiving usual primary care (Sheehan Disability Scale, z = 2.23; P =.025). Patients receiving intervention also reported a trend toward more improvement in SF-36-defined social functioning than patients receiving usual care (z = 1.63, P =.10), but there was no significant difference in role performance (z = 0.07, P =.94).
Conclusions: Significant disability accompanied depression in this persistently depressed group. The stepped care intervention resulted in small to moderate functional improvements for these primary care patients. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:1052-1058