Detection of expansion regions in Portuguese bipolar families.

American Journal of Medical Genetics Pub Date : 2000-12-04
C N Pato, A Macedo, A Ambrosio, J B Vincent, A Bauer, K Schindler, J Xu, I Coelho, A Dourado, J Valente, M H Azevedo, J L Kennedy, M T Pato
{"title":"Detection of expansion regions in Portuguese bipolar families.","authors":"C N Pato,&nbsp;A Macedo,&nbsp;A Ambrosio,&nbsp;J B Vincent,&nbsp;A Bauer,&nbsp;K Schindler,&nbsp;J Xu,&nbsp;I Coelho,&nbsp;A Dourado,&nbsp;J Valente,&nbsp;M H Azevedo,&nbsp;J L Kennedy,&nbsp;M T Pato","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We have studied 24 families with multiple affected members with bipolar disorder to test the hypothesis that in those families clinically showing genetic anticipation [Macedo et al., 1999] we would find large repeat expansions. The families meeting inclusion criteria had a minimum of two affected members over two generations and showed marked anticipation both in terms of age of onset and disease severity. We used the repeat expansion detection (RED) method to test patients (n = 24) and controls from these families and unrelated controls (n = 53). We also genotyped patients and family members from two families with large expansions at the known expansion loci on chromosomes 13, 17, and 18. The RED method revealed a higher number of large expansions in patients compared with controls (t-test; P < 0.0055: Mann-Whitney U; P = 0.02). The patients with the largest expansions were typed at the specific loci on chromosomes 13, 17, and 18 and the chromosome 18 expansion locus segregated with disease in one family, and a second family showed segregation with the expansion located at the SCA8 locus on chromosome 13. Genetic anticipation had been analyzed in this cohort of families, with correction for potential ascertainment bias, possible proband effects, cohort effects, regression to the mean, gender effects, and maternal vs. paternal transmission. None of these potential confounds appeared to account for the observed anticipation. We also identified that the presence of large expansions in affected family members derives primarily from two families from the genetically isolated Azores population. One family shows segregation with the chromosome 18 locus, whereas the other family segregates with expansions at the SCA8 locus. Am. J. Med. Genet. (Neuropsychiatr. Genet.) 96:854-857, 2000.</p>","PeriodicalId":7708,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Medical Genetics","volume":"96 6","pages":"854-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Medical Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We have studied 24 families with multiple affected members with bipolar disorder to test the hypothesis that in those families clinically showing genetic anticipation [Macedo et al., 1999] we would find large repeat expansions. The families meeting inclusion criteria had a minimum of two affected members over two generations and showed marked anticipation both in terms of age of onset and disease severity. We used the repeat expansion detection (RED) method to test patients (n = 24) and controls from these families and unrelated controls (n = 53). We also genotyped patients and family members from two families with large expansions at the known expansion loci on chromosomes 13, 17, and 18. The RED method revealed a higher number of large expansions in patients compared with controls (t-test; P < 0.0055: Mann-Whitney U; P = 0.02). The patients with the largest expansions were typed at the specific loci on chromosomes 13, 17, and 18 and the chromosome 18 expansion locus segregated with disease in one family, and a second family showed segregation with the expansion located at the SCA8 locus on chromosome 13. Genetic anticipation had been analyzed in this cohort of families, with correction for potential ascertainment bias, possible proband effects, cohort effects, regression to the mean, gender effects, and maternal vs. paternal transmission. None of these potential confounds appeared to account for the observed anticipation. We also identified that the presence of large expansions in affected family members derives primarily from two families from the genetically isolated Azores population. One family shows segregation with the chromosome 18 locus, whereas the other family segregates with expansions at the SCA8 locus. Am. J. Med. Genet. (Neuropsychiatr. Genet.) 96:854-857, 2000.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
葡萄牙双相情感障碍家族扩展区的检测。
我们研究了24个有多名双相情感障碍患者的家庭,以验证在那些临床表现出遗传预期的家庭中,我们会发现大量重复扩增的假设[Macedo等人,1999]。符合纳入标准的家庭至少有两代患病成员,并且在发病年龄和疾病严重程度方面都表现出明显的预期。我们使用重复扩增检测(RED)方法对来自这些家庭的患者(n = 24)和对照组以及无血缘关系的对照组(n = 53)进行检测。我们还对来自两个家族的患者和家庭成员进行了基因分型,这些家族在13,17和18号染色体上已知的扩增位点上有大量扩增。RED方法显示,与对照组相比,患者中有更多的大扩张(t检验;P < 0.0055: Mann-Whitney U;P = 0.02)。扩增最多的患者分型于13、17、18号染色体上的特定位点,其中一个家族的18号染色体扩增位点与疾病分离,另一个家族的扩增位点位于13号染色体上的SCA8位点。在这个家庭队列中对遗传预期进行了分析,并对潜在的确定偏差、可能的先证效应、队列效应、回归均值、性别效应和母系与父系遗传进行了校正。这些潜在的混淆似乎都不能解释观察到的预期。我们还确定,受影响家庭成员的大量增加主要来自遗传上孤立的亚速尔群岛人口中的两个家庭。一个家族在18号染色体位点分离,而另一个家族在SCA8位点扩增分离。点。J. Med. Genet。(Neuropsychiatr。[j] .地理学报(英文版)96:854- 857,2000。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
TM4SF2 gene involvement reconsidered in an XLMR family after neuropsychological assessment. Variable expression of mental retardation, autism, seizures, and dystonic hand movements in two families with an identical ARX gene mutation. Lymphedema-lymphangiectasia-mental retardation (Hennekam) syndrome: a review. Difficulties in the diagnosis of neurofibomatosis-1 in children. Adjunct diagnostic test for Angelman syndrome: the tuning fork response.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1