A receptor binding assay for paralytic shellfish poisoning toxins: recent advances and applications.

C L Powell, G J Doucette
{"title":"A receptor binding assay for paralytic shellfish poisoning toxins: recent advances and applications.","authors":"C L Powell,&nbsp;G J Doucette","doi":"10.1002/1522-7189(199911/12)7:6<393::aid-nt82>3.0.co;2-c","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We recently described a high throughput receptor binding assay for paralytic shellfish poisoning (PSP) toxins, the use of the assay for detecting toxic activity in shellfish and algal extracts, and the validation of 11-[3H]-tetrodotoxin as an alternative radioligand to the [3H]-saxitoxin conventionally employed in the assay. Here, we report a dramatic increase in assay efficiency through application of microplate scintillation technology, resulting in an assay turn around time of 4 h. Efforts are now focused on demonstrating the range of applications for which this receptor assay can provide data comparable to the more time consuming, technically demanding HPLC analysis of PSP toxins, currently the method of choice for researchers. To date, we have compared the results of both methods for a variety of sample types, including different genera of PSP toxin producing dinoflagellates (e.g. Alexandrium lusitanicum, r2 = 0.9834, n = 12), size-fractioned field samples of Alexandrium spp. (20-64 microm; r2 = 0.9997, n = 10) as well as its associated zooplankton grazer community (200-500 microm: r2 = 0.6169, n = 10; >500 microm: r2 = 0.5063, n = 10), and contaminated human fluids (r2 = 0.9661, n = 7) from a PSP outbreak. Receptor-based STX equivalent values for all but the zooplankton samples were highly correlated and exhibited close quantitative agreement with those produced by HPLC. While the PSP receptor binding assay does not provide information on toxin composition obtainable by HPLC, it does represent a robust and reliable means of rapidly assessing PSP-like toxicity in laboratory and field samples. Moreover, this assay should be effective as a screening tool for use by public health officials in responding to suspected cases of PSP intoxication.</p>","PeriodicalId":18777,"journal":{"name":"Natural toxins","volume":"7 6","pages":"393-400"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/1522-7189(199911/12)7:6<393::aid-nt82>3.0.co;2-c","citationCount":"41","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural toxins","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/1522-7189(199911/12)7:6<393::aid-nt82>3.0.co;2-c","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

Abstract

We recently described a high throughput receptor binding assay for paralytic shellfish poisoning (PSP) toxins, the use of the assay for detecting toxic activity in shellfish and algal extracts, and the validation of 11-[3H]-tetrodotoxin as an alternative radioligand to the [3H]-saxitoxin conventionally employed in the assay. Here, we report a dramatic increase in assay efficiency through application of microplate scintillation technology, resulting in an assay turn around time of 4 h. Efforts are now focused on demonstrating the range of applications for which this receptor assay can provide data comparable to the more time consuming, technically demanding HPLC analysis of PSP toxins, currently the method of choice for researchers. To date, we have compared the results of both methods for a variety of sample types, including different genera of PSP toxin producing dinoflagellates (e.g. Alexandrium lusitanicum, r2 = 0.9834, n = 12), size-fractioned field samples of Alexandrium spp. (20-64 microm; r2 = 0.9997, n = 10) as well as its associated zooplankton grazer community (200-500 microm: r2 = 0.6169, n = 10; >500 microm: r2 = 0.5063, n = 10), and contaminated human fluids (r2 = 0.9661, n = 7) from a PSP outbreak. Receptor-based STX equivalent values for all but the zooplankton samples were highly correlated and exhibited close quantitative agreement with those produced by HPLC. While the PSP receptor binding assay does not provide information on toxin composition obtainable by HPLC, it does represent a robust and reliable means of rapidly assessing PSP-like toxicity in laboratory and field samples. Moreover, this assay should be effective as a screening tool for use by public health officials in responding to suspected cases of PSP intoxication.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
麻痹性贝类中毒毒素的受体结合试验:最新进展及应用。
我们最近描述了一种用于麻痹性贝类中毒(PSP)毒素的高通量受体结合试验,该试验用于检测贝类和藻类提取物中的毒性活性,并验证了11-[3H]-河豚毒素作为常规试验中使用的[3H]-蛤蚌毒素的替代放射配体。在这里,我们报告了通过应用微孔板闪烁技术,分析效率的显著提高,导致分析周转时间为4小时。现在的工作重点是证明这种受体分析可以提供与目前研究人员选择的更耗时、技术要求更高的高效液相色谱分析PSP毒素相媲美的数据的应用范围。到目前为止,我们已经比较了两种方法对各种样品类型的结果,包括不同属的产生PSP毒素的鞭毛藻(如lusitanicum, r2 = 0.9834, n = 12), Alexandrium spp.(20-64微米;R2 = 0.9997, n = 10)及其伴生的浮游动物食草群落(200 ~ 500微米:R2 = 0.6169, n = 10;>500微米:r2 = 0.5063, n = 10),以及来自PSP爆发的被污染的人体体液(r2 = 0.9661, n = 7)。除浮游动物样品外,其余样品的STX等效值与HPLC测定结果高度相关,且定量一致。虽然PSP受体结合试验不能提供高效液相色谱法获得的毒素成分信息,但它确实代表了一种快速评估实验室和现场样品中PSP样毒性的可靠方法。此外,这种分析应该是有效的筛选工具,用于公共卫生官员在应对疑似病例PSP中毒。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Erratum: Alfonso D, Johnson HA, Colman-Saizarbitoria T, Presley CP, McCabe GP, McLaughlin JL (1996): SARs of annonaceous acetogenins in rat liver mitochondria. Nat Toxins 4:181-188. Advances in detection methods for fungal and algal toxins. HPLC/MS analysis of fusarium mycotoxins, fumonisins and deoxynivalenol. Neuronal binding of tetanus toxin compared to its ganglioside binding fragment (H(c)). A new type sandwich immunoassay for microcystin: production of monoclonal antibodies specific to the immune complex formed by microcystin and an anti-microcystin monoclonal antibody.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1