[Evaluation of antibiotic prophylaxis in neutropenic patients with hematologic malignancies].

P Delarive, J D Baumgartner, M P Glauser, A Cometta
{"title":"[Evaluation of antibiotic prophylaxis in neutropenic patients with hematologic malignancies].","authors":"P Delarive,&nbsp;J D Baumgartner,&nbsp;M P Glauser,&nbsp;A Cometta","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The benefits of oral prophylaxis for neutropenia have remained controversial up to now. We evaluated retrospectively the effect of antibiotic prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin and penicillin on the prevention of bacterial infections in 112 cases of prolonged neutropenia in adult patients treated for haematological malignancies. 41 patients received prophylaxis between December 1993 and November 1994 while 71 patients did not receive prophylaxis between December 1994 and November 1995. There were no significant differences between groups in age, sex, type or stage of haemopathy, type of chemotherapy and duration of neutropenia. The antibiotic prophylaxis reduced the number of overall infections (p = 0.05) and the number of gram-negative bacteraemias (p = 0.02). The median time to the onset of fever, the duration of fever, the duration of antibiotic treatment, the duration of hospitalization or admission to the intensive care unit, the number of serious complications or death were not influenced by antibiotic prophylaxis. The prophylaxis did not reduce the overall incidence of bacteraemia, of clinically documented infections or of fever of unknown origin. This retrospective study confirms that oral prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin and penicillin decreases the incidence of infections and, in particular, of gram-negative bacteraemia, but does not modify the overall morbidity and mortality in our patients. In view of the risk of emergence of bacterial resistance, these data do not support the routine use of oral antibiotic prophylaxis in neutropenic patients with haematological malignancies.</p>","PeriodicalId":21484,"journal":{"name":"Schweizerische medizinische Wochenschrift","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schweizerische medizinische Wochenschrift","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The benefits of oral prophylaxis for neutropenia have remained controversial up to now. We evaluated retrospectively the effect of antibiotic prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin and penicillin on the prevention of bacterial infections in 112 cases of prolonged neutropenia in adult patients treated for haematological malignancies. 41 patients received prophylaxis between December 1993 and November 1994 while 71 patients did not receive prophylaxis between December 1994 and November 1995. There were no significant differences between groups in age, sex, type or stage of haemopathy, type of chemotherapy and duration of neutropenia. The antibiotic prophylaxis reduced the number of overall infections (p = 0.05) and the number of gram-negative bacteraemias (p = 0.02). The median time to the onset of fever, the duration of fever, the duration of antibiotic treatment, the duration of hospitalization or admission to the intensive care unit, the number of serious complications or death were not influenced by antibiotic prophylaxis. The prophylaxis did not reduce the overall incidence of bacteraemia, of clinically documented infections or of fever of unknown origin. This retrospective study confirms that oral prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin and penicillin decreases the incidence of infections and, in particular, of gram-negative bacteraemia, but does not modify the overall morbidity and mortality in our patients. In view of the risk of emergence of bacterial resistance, these data do not support the routine use of oral antibiotic prophylaxis in neutropenic patients with haematological malignancies.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[血液系统恶性肿瘤中性粒细胞减少患者抗生素预防的评价]。
口服预防中性粒细胞减少症的益处至今仍有争议。我们回顾性评价了环丙沙星和青霉素预防112例成人血液恶性肿瘤患者长期中性粒细胞减少症的细菌感染的效果。在1993年12月至1994年11月期间,41名患者接受了预防治疗,而在1994年12月至1995年11月期间,71名患者未接受预防治疗。在年龄、性别、血液病的类型或分期、化疗类型和中性粒细胞减少的持续时间等方面,组间无显著差异。抗生素预防降低了总感染人数(p = 0.05)和革兰氏阴性菌血症人数(p = 0.02)。出现发热的中位时间、发热持续时间、抗生素治疗持续时间、住院或入住重症监护病房的持续时间、严重并发症或死亡人数不受抗生素预防的影响。预防措施并没有降低菌血症、临床记录的感染或不明原因发热的总体发生率。这项回顾性研究证实,口服环丙沙星和青霉素预防可降低感染的发生率,特别是革兰氏阴性菌血症的发生率,但不能改变我们患者的总体发病率和死亡率。鉴于出现细菌耐药的风险,这些数据不支持在嗜中性粒细胞减少的血液恶性肿瘤患者中常规使用口服抗生素预防。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of focal liver lesions in non-cirrhotic liver – expert opinion statement by the Swiss Association for the Study of the Liver and the Swiss Society of Gastroenterology [Postpartum depression]. [Congenital atransferrinemia]. [Neuroendocrine carcinoma]. [Heart transplantation].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1