Clinical management of premalignant lesions of the prostate. WHO Collaborative Project and Consensus Conference on Public Health and Clinical Significance of Premalignant Alterations in the Genitourinary Tract.

M J Häggman, J Adolfsson, S Khoury, J E Montie, J Norlén
{"title":"Clinical management of premalignant lesions of the prostate. WHO Collaborative Project and Consensus Conference on Public Health and Clinical Significance of Premalignant Alterations in the Genitourinary Tract.","authors":"M J Häggman,&nbsp;J Adolfsson,&nbsp;S Khoury,&nbsp;J E Montie,&nbsp;J Norlén","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The presence of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) in a prostate biopsy is a considerable risk factor for the presence of prostate cancer, with up to 73% of patients having cancer on rebiopsy. The risk is related to the clinical setting (screening vs urological practice) and patient factors such as prostatic serum antigen (PSA) and findings on digital rectal examination (DRE). Thus, high-grade PIN has serious clinical implications. The aim of this paper is to propose practical guidelines for the clinical management of PIN. Based on current knowledge we recommend that: Only patients considered for curative treatment of prostate cancer be further investigated for a PIN biopsy finding; A palpable nodule or tumor-suspicious transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) finding, in conjunction with a finding of high-grade PIN on prostate biopsy, should prompt rebiopsy; An elevated PSA level or an elevated PSA density should also warrant repeat biopsy, as the most likely cause of PSA elevation is concomitant prostate cancer; The presence of high-grade PIN on biopsy without concomitant prostate cancer in patients suitable for curative treatment, notwithstanding normal DRE, TRUS or PSA, should prompt repeat biopsies, as the association with prostate cancer is significant; The presence of PIN alone on biopsy does not warrant treatment, as a substantial number of rebiopsies yield only PIN.</p>","PeriodicalId":76529,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology. Supplementum","volume":" 205","pages":"44-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology. Supplementum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The presence of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) in a prostate biopsy is a considerable risk factor for the presence of prostate cancer, with up to 73% of patients having cancer on rebiopsy. The risk is related to the clinical setting (screening vs urological practice) and patient factors such as prostatic serum antigen (PSA) and findings on digital rectal examination (DRE). Thus, high-grade PIN has serious clinical implications. The aim of this paper is to propose practical guidelines for the clinical management of PIN. Based on current knowledge we recommend that: Only patients considered for curative treatment of prostate cancer be further investigated for a PIN biopsy finding; A palpable nodule or tumor-suspicious transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) finding, in conjunction with a finding of high-grade PIN on prostate biopsy, should prompt rebiopsy; An elevated PSA level or an elevated PSA density should also warrant repeat biopsy, as the most likely cause of PSA elevation is concomitant prostate cancer; The presence of high-grade PIN on biopsy without concomitant prostate cancer in patients suitable for curative treatment, notwithstanding normal DRE, TRUS or PSA, should prompt repeat biopsies, as the association with prostate cancer is significant; The presence of PIN alone on biopsy does not warrant treatment, as a substantial number of rebiopsies yield only PIN.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前列腺癌前病变的临床处理。世卫组织泌尿生殖系统癌前病变的公共卫生和临床意义合作项目和共识会议。
前列腺活检中出现高级别前列腺上皮内瘤变(PIN)是前列腺癌存在的一个相当大的危险因素,高达73%的患者在再次活检时患有癌症。风险与临床环境(筛查与泌尿科实践)和患者因素(如前列腺血清抗原(PSA)和直肠指检(DRE)的结果)有关。因此,高级别PIN具有严重的临床意义。本文的目的是为PIN的临床管理提出实用的指导方针。根据目前的知识,我们建议:只有被认为可以根治前列腺癌的患者才需要进一步调查PIN活检结果;可触及结节或经直肠超声检查(TRUS)发现可疑肿瘤,并结合前列腺活检发现高级别PIN,应提示重新活检;PSA水平升高或PSA密度升高也需要重复活检,因为PSA升高最可能的原因是合并前列腺癌;对于适合根治性治疗的患者,尽管DRE、TRUS或PSA正常,但活检中出现高级别PIN而未伴有前列腺癌,应提示重复活检,因为与前列腺癌的关联是显著的;活检中单独出现PIN不能作为治疗的依据,因为大量的再活检只产生PIN。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Orchiectomy. Bacterial vaginosis. Bladder cancer: from pathogenesis to prevention. Chairmen's summary. The epidemiology of bladder cancer in Russia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1