[Usefulness of the Brouillette index in the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in children].

Anales Espanoles De Pediatria Pub Date : 2000-12-01
Villa Asensi J, De Miguel Díez J, Romero Andújar F, Campelo Moreno O, Sequeiros González A, R MuñozCodoceo
{"title":"[Usefulness of the Brouillette index in the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in children].","authors":"Villa Asensi J,&nbsp;De Miguel Díez J,&nbsp;Romero Andújar F,&nbsp;Campelo Moreno O,&nbsp;Sequeiros González A,&nbsp;R MuñozCodoceo","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Polygraphy enables differentiation between primary snoring and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). A clinical score (Brouillette Index) has been proposed that could be useful in classifying children suspected of suffering from this disorder and in reducing the number of polysomnographic studies.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We evaluated 192 consecutive children with adenoton-sillar hypertrophy and with no craniofacial abnormalities or other associated diseases referred to our pediatric respiratory clinic for suspected OSAS. The Brouillette Index (BI) was used to classify the patients into a) non-OSAS (BI < neg 1), b) uncertain OSAS (BI between neg 1 and 3.5 and c) OSAS (BI > 3.5). For the polygraphic diagnosis we analyzed two different criteria for differentiating between OSAS and primary snoring: a respiratory distress index (RDI) >= 3 or >= 5.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The BI correctly classified only 23% of the patients with suspected OSAS. In the great majority of the children, polysomnographic monitoring was needed to differentiate between OSAS and primary snoring. In one group of children (10.9% or 6.4% depending on the diagnostic criteria), the BI would have led to incorrect classification.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The BI is not an efficient tool for discriminating between primary snoring and OSAS in an outpatient pediatric respiratory clinic.</p>","PeriodicalId":7778,"journal":{"name":"Anales Espanoles De Pediatria","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anales Espanoles De Pediatria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Polygraphy enables differentiation between primary snoring and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). A clinical score (Brouillette Index) has been proposed that could be useful in classifying children suspected of suffering from this disorder and in reducing the number of polysomnographic studies.

Patients and methods: We evaluated 192 consecutive children with adenoton-sillar hypertrophy and with no craniofacial abnormalities or other associated diseases referred to our pediatric respiratory clinic for suspected OSAS. The Brouillette Index (BI) was used to classify the patients into a) non-OSAS (BI < neg 1), b) uncertain OSAS (BI between neg 1 and 3.5 and c) OSAS (BI > 3.5). For the polygraphic diagnosis we analyzed two different criteria for differentiating between OSAS and primary snoring: a respiratory distress index (RDI) >= 3 or >= 5.

Results: The BI correctly classified only 23% of the patients with suspected OSAS. In the great majority of the children, polysomnographic monitoring was needed to differentiate between OSAS and primary snoring. In one group of children (10.9% or 6.4% depending on the diagnostic criteria), the BI would have led to incorrect classification.

Conclusions: The BI is not an efficient tool for discriminating between primary snoring and OSAS in an outpatient pediatric respiratory clinic.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Brouillette指数在儿童阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征诊断中的应用
目的:测谎可以区分原发性打鼾和阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征(OSAS)。一种临床评分(Brouillette Index)已被提出,可用于对疑似患有这种疾病的儿童进行分类,并减少多导睡眠图研究的数量。患者和方法:我们评估了192例连续的儿童,这些儿童患有腺瘤样腺肥大,没有颅面异常或其他相关疾病,被我们的儿科呼吸诊所怀疑为OSAS。采用布鲁莱特指数(Brouillette Index, BI)将患者分为a)非OSAS (BI < - 1)、b)不确定OSAS (BI介于- 1 ~ 3.5之间)和c) OSAS (BI > 3.5)。对于多测图诊断,我们分析了两种不同的标准来区分OSAS和原发性打鼾:呼吸窘迫指数(RDI) >= 3或>= 5。结果:BI对疑似OSAS患者的正确分类仅为23%。在绝大多数儿童中,需要多导睡眠图监测来区分OSAS和原发性打鼾。在一组儿童中(10.9%或6.4%取决于诊断标准),BI会导致不正确的分类。结论:在儿科呼吸门诊,BI不是鉴别原发性打鼾和OSAS的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Ellis-Van Creveld syndrome]. [McCune-Albright syndrome]. [Tympanometry]. [Sandhoff disease]. [Diabetic retinopathy].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1