An informant-based assessment of apathy in Alzheimer disease.

Milton E Strauss, Susan D Sperry
{"title":"An informant-based assessment of apathy in Alzheimer disease.","authors":"Milton E Strauss,&nbsp;Susan D Sperry","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To standardize a new rating scale for the assessment of apathy in Alzheimer disease (AD) and report on its reliability, structure, and relation to other clinical features of AD.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>apathy is a common prominent behavioral syndrome accompanying AD and is associated with excess disability and increased caregiver burden. Current instruments for the assessment of apathy in AD do not explicitly and systematically attempt to differentiate limited activity and engagement due to lack of interest from inability or longstanding, premorbid personality traits. The present assessment, the Dementia Apathy Interview and Rating (DAIR), was developed taking these discriminations into account in question construction and interview format.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred participants (50% women) in the University Memory and Aging Center Research Registry with Probable or Possible AD (by NINCDS-ADRDA criteria) were assessed through caregiver interview or direct patient assessment for apathy, depression, and severity of cognitive and functional deficits. Item distribution characteristics, factor analysis, and evaluation of reliability were used to develop the final item set for the DAIR, and correlations with other measures were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A 16-item unidimensional apathy scale with excellent internal consistency (alpha = 0.89) and temporal reliability ( = 0.85 over 2 months) was developed. Individual differences in apathy on the DAIR were unrelated to dysphoria. Apathy was significantly associated with functional and cognitive impairment, while depression was not.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DAIR is a reliable informant-based assessment of apathy in persons with AD. Although apathy is assessed with respect to behaviors within the repertoire of patients, this behavioral syndrome remains associated with more severe deficits in cognitive and adaptive functioning. Associations between depression and dementia severity reported in some studies may reflect the confounding of apathy and depression in some assessment instruments.</p>","PeriodicalId":79516,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, and behavioral neurology","volume":"15 3","pages":"176-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, and behavioral neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To standardize a new rating scale for the assessment of apathy in Alzheimer disease (AD) and report on its reliability, structure, and relation to other clinical features of AD.

Background: apathy is a common prominent behavioral syndrome accompanying AD and is associated with excess disability and increased caregiver burden. Current instruments for the assessment of apathy in AD do not explicitly and systematically attempt to differentiate limited activity and engagement due to lack of interest from inability or longstanding, premorbid personality traits. The present assessment, the Dementia Apathy Interview and Rating (DAIR), was developed taking these discriminations into account in question construction and interview format.

Methods: One hundred participants (50% women) in the University Memory and Aging Center Research Registry with Probable or Possible AD (by NINCDS-ADRDA criteria) were assessed through caregiver interview or direct patient assessment for apathy, depression, and severity of cognitive and functional deficits. Item distribution characteristics, factor analysis, and evaluation of reliability were used to develop the final item set for the DAIR, and correlations with other measures were examined.

Results: A 16-item unidimensional apathy scale with excellent internal consistency (alpha = 0.89) and temporal reliability ( = 0.85 over 2 months) was developed. Individual differences in apathy on the DAIR were unrelated to dysphoria. Apathy was significantly associated with functional and cognitive impairment, while depression was not.

Conclusions: The DAIR is a reliable informant-based assessment of apathy in persons with AD. Although apathy is assessed with respect to behaviors within the repertoire of patients, this behavioral syndrome remains associated with more severe deficits in cognitive and adaptive functioning. Associations between depression and dementia severity reported in some studies may reflect the confounding of apathy and depression in some assessment instruments.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于信息的阿尔茨海默病冷漠评估。
目的:规范一种新的阿尔茨海默病(AD)冷漠评价量表,并报道其可靠性、结构及其与AD其他临床特征的关系。背景:冷漠是阿尔茨海默病常见的突出行为综合征,与残疾过度和照顾者负担增加有关。目前评估阿尔茨海默氏症冷漠的工具并没有明确和系统地尝试区分由于缺乏兴趣而导致的有限活动和参与与无能或长期的病前人格特征。目前的评估,痴呆冷漠访谈和评级(DAIR),是在问题结构和访谈格式中考虑到这些歧视而开发的。方法:在大学记忆与衰老研究中心登记的100名可能或可能患有AD的参与者(50%为女性)(根据NINCDS-ADRDA标准)通过护理者访谈或直接患者评估冷漠,抑郁,认知和功能缺陷的严重程度进行评估。项目分布特征、因子分析和可靠性评估被用于开发DAIR的最终项目集,并检验了与其他测量的相关性。结果:编制出具有良好内部一致性(α = 0.89)和时间信度(2个月以上= 0.85)的16项单向度冷漠量表。DAIR中冷漠的个体差异与焦虑无关。冷漠与功能和认知障碍显著相关,而抑郁与此无关。结论:DAIR是一种可靠的基于信息的阿尔茨海默病患者冷漠评估。虽然冷漠是根据患者的行为来评估的,但这种行为综合症仍然与认知和适应功能的更严重缺陷有关。一些研究报告的抑郁和痴呆严重程度之间的关联可能反映了一些评估工具中冷漠和抑郁的混淆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reorientation of attention in Huntington disease. A multivariate classification study of attentional orienting in patients with right hemisphere lesions. Hypersexuality after pallidal surgery in Parkinson disease. Misdiagnosis of schizophrenia in a patient with psychotic symptoms. Cerebral blood flow changes in depressed patients after treatment with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: evidence of individual variability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1