Pregnancy outcome distribution and prenatal diagnosis of autosomal abnormalities, Hawaii, 1986-1999.

Teratology Pub Date : 2002-01-01 DOI:10.1002/tera.90003
Mathias B Forrester, Ruth D Merz
{"title":"Pregnancy outcome distribution and prenatal diagnosis of autosomal abnormalities, Hawaii, 1986-1999.","authors":"Mathias B Forrester,&nbsp;Ruth D Merz","doi":"10.1002/tera.90003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Approximately 10% of birth defects result from chromosomal abnormalities. This study investigated the pregnancy outcome distribution of autosomal abnormalities and impact of prenatal diagnosis on autosomal abnormalities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were obtained from a population-based birth defects registry and included all autosomal abnormalities delivered in Hawaii during 1986-1999.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 1,015 autosomal abnormality cases, consisting of 523 (52%) live births, 38 (4%) late fetal deaths, 187 (18%) early fetal deaths, 265 (26%) elective terminations, and 2 unknown pregnancy outcome. Live births comprised the majority of translocations (81%), inversions (93%), and deletions (84%) but a smaller proportion of trisomies (42%). Autosomal abnormalities were prenatally diagnosed in 489 (48%) of the cases, of which 243 (50%) were subsequently electively terminated. By type of autosomal abnormality, prenatal diagnosis rates were trisomy (44%), translocation (68%), inversion (91%), deletion (29%), and subsequent elective termination rates were trisomy (73%), translocation (11%), inversion (4%), deletion (50%). The prenatal diagnosis rate was higher for maternal age 35 years or greater than for maternal age less than 35 years (relative risk (RR) 1.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.6-2.0), as was the elective termination rate (RR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.6). The prenatal diagnosis rate was higher in 1993-1999 than in 1986-1992 (RR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.4), although there was no statistically significant difference between the two time periods for subsequent elective termination rate (RR 0.9, 95% CI 0.8-1.1).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pregnancy outcome distribution, prenatal diagnosis rates, and subsequent elective terminations rates vary by type of autosomal abnormality.</p>","PeriodicalId":22211,"journal":{"name":"Teratology","volume":"66 Suppl 1 ","pages":"S7-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/tera.90003","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teratology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tera.90003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Background: Approximately 10% of birth defects result from chromosomal abnormalities. This study investigated the pregnancy outcome distribution of autosomal abnormalities and impact of prenatal diagnosis on autosomal abnormalities.

Methods: Data were obtained from a population-based birth defects registry and included all autosomal abnormalities delivered in Hawaii during 1986-1999.

Results: There were 1,015 autosomal abnormality cases, consisting of 523 (52%) live births, 38 (4%) late fetal deaths, 187 (18%) early fetal deaths, 265 (26%) elective terminations, and 2 unknown pregnancy outcome. Live births comprised the majority of translocations (81%), inversions (93%), and deletions (84%) but a smaller proportion of trisomies (42%). Autosomal abnormalities were prenatally diagnosed in 489 (48%) of the cases, of which 243 (50%) were subsequently electively terminated. By type of autosomal abnormality, prenatal diagnosis rates were trisomy (44%), translocation (68%), inversion (91%), deletion (29%), and subsequent elective termination rates were trisomy (73%), translocation (11%), inversion (4%), deletion (50%). The prenatal diagnosis rate was higher for maternal age 35 years or greater than for maternal age less than 35 years (relative risk (RR) 1.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.6-2.0), as was the elective termination rate (RR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.6). The prenatal diagnosis rate was higher in 1993-1999 than in 1986-1992 (RR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.4), although there was no statistically significant difference between the two time periods for subsequent elective termination rate (RR 0.9, 95% CI 0.8-1.1).

Conclusions: Pregnancy outcome distribution, prenatal diagnosis rates, and subsequent elective terminations rates vary by type of autosomal abnormality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妊娠结局分布和常染色体异常的产前诊断,夏威夷,1986-1999。
背景:大约10%的出生缺陷是由染色体异常引起的。本研究探讨常染色体异常的妊娠结局分布及产前诊断对常染色体异常的影响。方法:数据来自以人口为基础的出生缺陷登记处,包括1986-1999年在夏威夷出生的所有常染色体异常。结果:常染色体异常1015例,其中活产523例(52%),晚期死胎38例(4%),早期死胎187例(18%),择期终止妊娠265例(26%),妊娠结局不明2例。活产包括大多数易位(81%)、倒位(93%)和缺失(84%),但三体的比例较小(42%)。在489例(48%)的病例中产前诊断出常染色体异常,其中243例(50%)随后选择性终止妊娠。根据常染色体异常类型,产前诊断率为三体(44%)、易位(68%)、反转(91%)、缺失(29%),随后的选择性终止率为三体(73%)、易位(11%)、反转(4%)、缺失(50%)。35岁及以上产妇的产前诊断率高于35岁以下产妇(相对危险度(RR) 1.8, 95%可信区间(CI) 1.6-2.0),选择性终止妊娠率(RR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.6)。1993-1999年的产前诊断率高于1986-1992年(RR为1.2,95% CI为1.1-1.4),但两个时期的择期终止率无统计学差异(RR为0.9,95% CI为0.8-1.1)。结论:妊娠结局分布、产前诊断率和随后的选择性终止率因常染色体异常类型而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Link between Male Genital Anomalies and Adult Male Reproductive Disorders: A Population-Based Data Linkage Study Spanning over 40 Years A new rapid radiological procedure for routine teratological use in bone ossification assessment: a supplement for staining methods. Timing of prenatal care initiation and risk of congenital malformations. Quantification and localization of expression of the retinoic acid receptor-beta and -gamma mRNA isoforms during neurulation in mouse embryos with or without spina bifida. Statement of the Public Affairs Committee of the Teratology Society on the fetal alcohol syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1