Opinion: [on anesthesia for outpatient female sterilization].

Biomedical bulletin Pub Date : 1983-04-01
A J Penfield
{"title":"Opinion: [on anesthesia for outpatient female sterilization].","authors":"A J Penfield","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In actual practice, the choice of anesthesia is more likely to be decided by the personal preference of the surgeon or anesthesiologist rather than by considerations of safety. Most gynecologists in the US and Canada, working in hospitals or surgicenters, choose general anesthesia becaused skilled anesthetists are available, and it is easier for them to operate if their patients are asleep. Most anesthesiologists prefer it that way also, since their services are being fully utilized. During residency training, gynecologists need the benefit of general anesthesia to learn surgical techniques. Because they learned that way, it is the course of least resistance for them to continue to favor general anesthesia. Thus hundreds of thousands of general anesthetics are given each year to suit the convenience and skills of the gynecologist. But minilaparotomy or laparoscopy may be performed with fewer potential complications under local anesthesia, provided the patient receives proper counseling and supportive care, and provided the gynecologist's surgical technique is gentle and precise. Unfortunately, most residency programs do not provide training in such techniques, so they are learned, if at all, during practice years.</p>","PeriodicalId":84276,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical bulletin","volume":"4 1","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In actual practice, the choice of anesthesia is more likely to be decided by the personal preference of the surgeon or anesthesiologist rather than by considerations of safety. Most gynecologists in the US and Canada, working in hospitals or surgicenters, choose general anesthesia becaused skilled anesthetists are available, and it is easier for them to operate if their patients are asleep. Most anesthesiologists prefer it that way also, since their services are being fully utilized. During residency training, gynecologists need the benefit of general anesthesia to learn surgical techniques. Because they learned that way, it is the course of least resistance for them to continue to favor general anesthesia. Thus hundreds of thousands of general anesthetics are given each year to suit the convenience and skills of the gynecologist. But minilaparotomy or laparoscopy may be performed with fewer potential complications under local anesthesia, provided the patient receives proper counseling and supportive care, and provided the gynecologist's surgical technique is gentle and precise. Unfortunately, most residency programs do not provide training in such techniques, so they are learned, if at all, during practice years.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
意见:【关于门诊女性绝育手术的麻醉】。
在实际操作中,麻醉的选择更可能是由外科医生或麻醉师的个人喜好决定的,而不是出于安全性的考虑。在美国和加拿大,大多数在医院或外科中心工作的妇科医生都选择全身麻醉,因为有熟练的麻醉师,如果病人睡着了,他们更容易操作。大多数麻醉师也喜欢这种方式,因为他们的服务正在被充分利用。在住院医师培训期间,妇科医生需要全身麻醉的好处来学习手术技术。因为他们是这样学习的,所以他们继续支持全身麻醉是阻力最小的过程。因此,每年有成千上万的全麻被给予,以适应妇科医生的方便和技能。但是,如果患者接受适当的咨询和支持性护理,并且妇科医生的手术技术温和而精确,那么在局部麻醉下进行小切口或腹腔镜手术的潜在并发症可能会更少。不幸的是,大多数住院医师项目不提供这些技术的培训,所以他们是在实习期间学习的,如果有的话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prevention of infection in voluntary surgical contraception. A review of epidemiologic studies of vasectomy. Open laparoscopy. Open laparoscopy. Commentary. Open laparoscopy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1