Gender bias in physicians' management of neck pain: a study of the answers in a Swedish national examination.

Katarina Hamberg, Gunilla Risberg, Eva E Johansson, Göran Westman
{"title":"Gender bias in physicians' management of neck pain: a study of the answers in a Swedish national examination.","authors":"Katarina Hamberg,&nbsp;Gunilla Risberg,&nbsp;Eva E Johansson,&nbsp;Göran Westman","doi":"10.1089/152460902760360595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research has raised concerns about gender bias in medicine; that is, are women and men being treated differently because of gender stereotyped attitudes among physicians? We investigated gender differences in the diagnosis and management of neck pain as proposed in a written test. The design eliminated differences related to communication and patient behavior.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a national examination for Swedish interns, using modified essay questions, the examinees were allocated to suggest management of neck pain in either a male or a female bus driver with a tense family situation. The case description was identical with the exception of patient gender. The open answers were coded for analysis. Two hundred thirty-nine interns (41% women) participated. Chi-square-tests were used to measure differences in proportions, and t test was used to evaluate differences in means.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In certain areas, significant gender differences were detected. Proposals of nonspecific somatic diagnoses, psychosocial questions, drug prescriptions, and the expressed need of diagnostic support from a physiotherapist and an orthopedist were more common with females. Laboratory tests were requested more often in males. Both male and female physicians contributed to the gender differences. When assessing the impact of the patient-doctor relationship for health outcome, male physicians underlined the importance of patient compliance foremost in female patients, and female physicians did the opposite.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results suggest that physicians' gendered expectations are involved in creating gender differences in medicine. The inclusion of gender theory and discussions about gender attitudes into medical school curricula is recommended to bring about awareness of the problem.</p>","PeriodicalId":80044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health & gender-based medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/152460902760360595","citationCount":"129","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health & gender-based medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/152460902760360595","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 129

Abstract

Background: Research has raised concerns about gender bias in medicine; that is, are women and men being treated differently because of gender stereotyped attitudes among physicians? We investigated gender differences in the diagnosis and management of neck pain as proposed in a written test. The design eliminated differences related to communication and patient behavior.

Methods: In a national examination for Swedish interns, using modified essay questions, the examinees were allocated to suggest management of neck pain in either a male or a female bus driver with a tense family situation. The case description was identical with the exception of patient gender. The open answers were coded for analysis. Two hundred thirty-nine interns (41% women) participated. Chi-square-tests were used to measure differences in proportions, and t test was used to evaluate differences in means.

Results: In certain areas, significant gender differences were detected. Proposals of nonspecific somatic diagnoses, psychosocial questions, drug prescriptions, and the expressed need of diagnostic support from a physiotherapist and an orthopedist were more common with females. Laboratory tests were requested more often in males. Both male and female physicians contributed to the gender differences. When assessing the impact of the patient-doctor relationship for health outcome, male physicians underlined the importance of patient compliance foremost in female patients, and female physicians did the opposite.

Conclusions: The results suggest that physicians' gendered expectations are involved in creating gender differences in medicine. The inclusion of gender theory and discussions about gender attitudes into medical school curricula is recommended to bring about awareness of the problem.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医生对颈部疼痛管理的性别偏见:瑞典国家考试答案的研究。
背景:研究引起了人们对医学中性别偏见的关注;也就是说,女性和男性是否因为医生对性别的刻板印象而受到不同的对待?我们调查了在笔试中提出的颈部疼痛诊断和管理的性别差异。该设计消除了与沟通和患者行为相关的差异。方法:在瑞典实习生的国家考试中,使用修改的作文题,考生被分配建议管理颈部疼痛的男性或女性公交车司机与紧张的家庭关系。除患者性别不同外,病例描述基本一致。开放的答案被编码以供分析。239名实习生(41%为女性)参与了该项目。比例差异采用卡方检验,均数差异采用t检验。结果:在某些领域存在显著的性别差异。非特异性躯体诊断的建议、心理社会问题、药物处方,以及对物理治疗师和骨科医生诊断支持的表达需求在女性中更为常见。男性更常要求进行实验室检查。男性和女性医生都对性别差异有贡献。在评估医患关系对健康结果的影响时,男性医生强调女性患者遵守医嘱的重要性,而女性医生则相反。结论:结果表明,医生的性别期望与医学性别差异的产生有关。建议将性别理论和关于性别态度的讨论纳入医学院课程,以提高对这一问题的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Maintaining fairness: who gets funded at NIH, and is the process fair? Entertainment outreach for women's health at CDC. Toward optimal health: the experts discuss polycystic ovary syndrome. Ovarian autoimmune disease and ovarian autoantibodies. Biologic and molecular mechanisms for sex differences in pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacogenetics: Part I.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1