Patient comfort with combined anterior sub-Tenon's, topical, and intracameral anesthesia versus retrobulbar anesthesia in trabeculectomy, phacotrabeculectomy, and aqueous shunt surgery.

Ophthalmic surgery and lasers Pub Date : 2002-11-01
Sukesh Kansal, Marlene R Moster, Marcia C Gomes, Courtland M Schmidt, Richard P Wilson
{"title":"Patient comfort with combined anterior sub-Tenon's, topical, and intracameral anesthesia versus retrobulbar anesthesia in trabeculectomy, phacotrabeculectomy, and aqueous shunt surgery.","authors":"Sukesh Kansal,&nbsp;Marlene R Moster,&nbsp;Marcia C Gomes,&nbsp;Courtland M Schmidt,&nbsp;Richard P Wilson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess patient comfort using combined anterior sub-Tenon's, topical, and intracameral (\"Blitz\") anesthesia versus retrobulbar anesthesia in glaucoma surgery.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In this study, 139 consecutive patients who received retrobulbar anesthesia and 139 consecutive patients who received Blitz anesthesia during glaucoma surgery were evaluated in a prospective fashion. The retrobulbar group included 49 trabeculectomies, 36 aqueous shunts, and 54 phacotrabeculectomies. The Blitz group included 49 trabeculectomies, 30 aqueous shunts, and 60 phacotrabeculectomies. Patients were asked to assess their level of ocular pain operatively and postoperatively on a 10-point visual analog scale. The operative and postoperative pain scores and postoperative sedation of patients receiving retrobulbar anesthesia were compared with those of patients receiving Blitz anesthesia during trabeculectomy, phacotrabeculectomy, and aqueous shunt surgery, separately.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant difference was found in the mean operative or postoperative pain scores between the two groups during trabeculectomy, phacotrabeculectomy, or aqueous shunt surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Blitz anesthesia offers a reasonable alternative to retrobulbar anesthesia for trabeculectomy, phacotrabeculectomy, and aqueous shunt surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":19509,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic surgery and lasers","volume":"33 6","pages":"456-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic surgery and lasers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess patient comfort using combined anterior sub-Tenon's, topical, and intracameral ("Blitz") anesthesia versus retrobulbar anesthesia in glaucoma surgery.

Patients and methods: In this study, 139 consecutive patients who received retrobulbar anesthesia and 139 consecutive patients who received Blitz anesthesia during glaucoma surgery were evaluated in a prospective fashion. The retrobulbar group included 49 trabeculectomies, 36 aqueous shunts, and 54 phacotrabeculectomies. The Blitz group included 49 trabeculectomies, 30 aqueous shunts, and 60 phacotrabeculectomies. Patients were asked to assess their level of ocular pain operatively and postoperatively on a 10-point visual analog scale. The operative and postoperative pain scores and postoperative sedation of patients receiving retrobulbar anesthesia were compared with those of patients receiving Blitz anesthesia during trabeculectomy, phacotrabeculectomy, and aqueous shunt surgery, separately.

Results: No statistically significant difference was found in the mean operative or postoperative pain scores between the two groups during trabeculectomy, phacotrabeculectomy, or aqueous shunt surgery.

Conclusions: Blitz anesthesia offers a reasonable alternative to retrobulbar anesthesia for trabeculectomy, phacotrabeculectomy, and aqueous shunt surgery.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在小梁切除术、超声小梁切除术和水分流手术中,与球后麻醉相比,联合前腱亚、局部和内窥镜麻醉的患者舒适度。
目的:评估青光眼手术中使用前腱亚、局部和内窥镜联合麻醉(“Blitz”)与球后麻醉的患者舒适度。患者和方法:在本研究中,对139例连续接受球后麻醉和139例连续接受Blitz麻醉的青光眼手术患者进行前瞻性评估。球后组包括49例小梁切除术,36例水分流术,54例超声小梁切除术。闪电战组包括49例小梁切除术,30例水分流术和60例超声小梁切除术。患者被要求在10分视觉模拟量表上评估他们手术和术后的眼部疼痛水平。分别比较球后麻醉患者与Blitz麻醉患者在小梁切除术、超声小梁切除术和水分流术中的手术和术后疼痛评分及术后镇静程度。结果:两组患者小梁切除术、超声小梁切除术和水分流术的平均手术和术后疼痛评分均无统计学差异。结论:在小梁切除术、超声小梁切除术和水分流手术中,闪电麻醉是球后麻醉的合理选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Introduction: Improving Outcomes for Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema Acute Visual Loss Secondary to Sneezing Concurrent Keratitis and Endophthalmitis Associated With Topical Medications Contaminated by Serratia Marcescens Donor Lenticule Centration for Trephination in DSAEK Welcome to OSLI Retina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1