Generating a mortality model from a pediatric ICU (PICU) database utilizing knowledge discovery.

Proceedings. AMIA Symposium Pub Date : 2002-01-01
Curtis E Kennedy, Noriaki Aoki
{"title":"Generating a mortality model from a pediatric ICU (PICU) database utilizing knowledge discovery.","authors":"Curtis E Kennedy,&nbsp;Noriaki Aoki","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current models for predicting outcomes are limited by biases inherent in a priori hypothesis generation. Knowledge discovery algorithms generate models directly from databases, minimizing such limitations. Our objective was to generate a mortality model from a PICU database utilizing knowledge discovery techniques. The database contained 5067 records with 192 clinically relevant variables. It was randomly split into training (75%) and validation (25%) groups. We used decision tree induction to generate a mortality model from the training data, and validated its performance on the validation data. The original PRISM algorithm was used for comparison. The decision tree model contained 25 variables and predicted 53/88 deaths; 29 correctly (Sens:33%, Spec:98%, PPV:54%). PRISM predicted 27/88 deaths correctly (Sens:30%, Spec:98%, PPV:51%). Performance difference between models was not significant. We conclude that knowledge discovery algorithms can generate a mortality model from a PICU database, helping establish validity of such tools in the clinical medical domain.</p>","PeriodicalId":79712,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. AMIA Symposium","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2244205/pdf/procamiasymp00001-0416.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. AMIA Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current models for predicting outcomes are limited by biases inherent in a priori hypothesis generation. Knowledge discovery algorithms generate models directly from databases, minimizing such limitations. Our objective was to generate a mortality model from a PICU database utilizing knowledge discovery techniques. The database contained 5067 records with 192 clinically relevant variables. It was randomly split into training (75%) and validation (25%) groups. We used decision tree induction to generate a mortality model from the training data, and validated its performance on the validation data. The original PRISM algorithm was used for comparison. The decision tree model contained 25 variables and predicted 53/88 deaths; 29 correctly (Sens:33%, Spec:98%, PPV:54%). PRISM predicted 27/88 deaths correctly (Sens:30%, Spec:98%, PPV:51%). Performance difference between models was not significant. We conclude that knowledge discovery algorithms can generate a mortality model from a PICU database, helping establish validity of such tools in the clinical medical domain.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用知识发现从儿科ICU (PICU)数据库生成死亡率模型。
目前预测结果的模型受到先天假设生成中固有偏差的限制。知识发现算法直接从数据库生成模型,最大限度地减少了这些限制。我们的目标是利用知识发现技术从PICU数据库生成死亡率模型。该数据库包含5067条记录和192个临床相关变量。随机分为训练组(75%)和验证组(25%)。我们利用决策树归纳法从训练数据中生成死亡率模型,并在验证数据上验证其性能。采用原PRISM算法进行比较。决策树模型包含25个变量,预测53/88例死亡;29个正确(Sens:33%, Spec:98%, PPV:54%)。PRISM正确预测了27/88的死亡(Sens:30%, Spec:98%, PPV:51%)。模型间性能差异不显著。我们得出结论,知识发现算法可以从PICU数据库生成死亡率模型,有助于建立此类工具在临床医学领域的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Electronic Patient Record Medical informatics as a market for IS/IT Perceived Information Needs and Communication Difficulties of Inpatient Physicians and Nurses Disambiguation Data: Extracting Information from Anonymized Sources The Operating Room Charge Nurse: Coordinator and Communicator
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1