Has the internet overtaken other traditional sources of health information? Questionnaire survey of patients attending ENT outpatient clinics.

A Rokade, P K D Kapoor, S Rao, V Rokade, K T V Reddy, B N Kumar
{"title":"Has the internet overtaken other traditional sources of health information? Questionnaire survey of patients attending ENT outpatient clinics.","authors":"A Rokade,&nbsp;P K D Kapoor,&nbsp;S Rao,&nbsp;V Rokade,&nbsp;K T V Reddy,&nbsp;B N Kumar","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-2273.2002.00621.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to find out whether patients attending ENT clinics obtain health information about their medical condition and to assess satisfaction with the sources of health information, including the internet. Three hundred and thirty patients attending ENT outpatient clinics at District General Hospitals in Wigan and Warrington during June 2001 were asked to complete detailed questionnaires. Fifty-seven per cent of patients attempted to obtain health information before their visit to the specialist clinic. Forty-five per cent of patients had access to the internet, but only 13% used it to obtain health information. General practitioners were the source of health information for 64%, but the NHS-Direct help line was only used by 16%. Patients also trusted the health information provided by their GPs the most. In the twenty-first century, patients turn to their GP as the main source of health information.</p>","PeriodicalId":10694,"journal":{"name":"Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences","volume":"27 6","pages":"526-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1365-2273.2002.00621.x","citationCount":"41","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2273.2002.00621.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

Abstract

The aim of this study was to find out whether patients attending ENT clinics obtain health information about their medical condition and to assess satisfaction with the sources of health information, including the internet. Three hundred and thirty patients attending ENT outpatient clinics at District General Hospitals in Wigan and Warrington during June 2001 were asked to complete detailed questionnaires. Fifty-seven per cent of patients attempted to obtain health information before their visit to the specialist clinic. Forty-five per cent of patients had access to the internet, but only 13% used it to obtain health information. General practitioners were the source of health information for 64%, but the NHS-Direct help line was only used by 16%. Patients also trusted the health information provided by their GPs the most. In the twenty-first century, patients turn to their GP as the main source of health information.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
互联网是否已经取代了其他传统的健康信息来源?耳鼻喉科门诊患者问卷调查。
本研究的目的在于了解在耳鼻喉科门诊就诊的病人是否能获得有关其医疗状况的健康信息,并评估他们对健康信息来源(包括互联网)的满意度。2001年6月期间,在维冈和沃灵顿地区综合医院的耳鼻喉科门诊就诊的330名病人被要求填写详细的调查问卷。57%的病人在去专科诊所之前试图获取健康信息。45%的病人可以上网,但只有13%的人利用互联网获取健康信息。全科医生是64%的健康信息来源,但NHS-Direct帮助热线只有16%的人使用。患者也最信任全科医生提供的健康信息。在21世纪,病人把他们的全科医生作为健康信息的主要来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Integrity in medical research and publication. The Epley manoeuvre for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo--a systematic review. Combating bacterial resistance in otorhinolaryngology. 11Beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 1 expression in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Sudden deafness: long-term follow-up and recurrence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1