J Seoane, P Varela-Centelles, J R Ramirez, M A Romero, A De La Cruz
{"title":"Artefacts produced by suture traction during incisional biopsy of oral lesions.","authors":"J Seoane, P Varela-Centelles, J R Ramirez, M A Romero, A De La Cruz","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-2273.2002.00619.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study is to compare the artefacts ascribed to the technique of incisional biopsy using a punch or scalpel and the influence of suture use for traction and delivery of the specimen. A total of 160 samples were obtained from 10 fresh pig tongues by four experienced oral surgeons. Handling artefacts (squeeze artefacts): crush, splits, fragmentation and pseudocysts were assessed. No differences were identified in terms of crush, fragmentation or pseudocysts between samples obtained with a punch or scalpel. Splits were more frequent in those biopsies taken with a scalpel (chi2 = 9.26; P= 0.0023). Artefacts in the punch biopsy group were significantly less than in the group that combined punch and suture traction (P < 0.01). The scalpel and suture traction group showed significantly more artefacts than the group without suture. It is concluded the use of a stitch for traction in small incisional biopsies causes squeeze artefacts, so its use should be restricted to specimen orientation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10694,"journal":{"name":"Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences","volume":"27 6","pages":"549-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1365-2273.2002.00619.x","citationCount":"37","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2273.2002.00619.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37
Abstract
The aim of this study is to compare the artefacts ascribed to the technique of incisional biopsy using a punch or scalpel and the influence of suture use for traction and delivery of the specimen. A total of 160 samples were obtained from 10 fresh pig tongues by four experienced oral surgeons. Handling artefacts (squeeze artefacts): crush, splits, fragmentation and pseudocysts were assessed. No differences were identified in terms of crush, fragmentation or pseudocysts between samples obtained with a punch or scalpel. Splits were more frequent in those biopsies taken with a scalpel (chi2 = 9.26; P= 0.0023). Artefacts in the punch biopsy group were significantly less than in the group that combined punch and suture traction (P < 0.01). The scalpel and suture traction group showed significantly more artefacts than the group without suture. It is concluded the use of a stitch for traction in small incisional biopsies causes squeeze artefacts, so its use should be restricted to specimen orientation.