Prevalence and methodology of patch testing by allergists in the United States: Results of a cross-sectional survey

April L. Farrell, Erin M. Warshaw, Yanli Zhao, David Nelson
{"title":"Prevalence and methodology of patch testing by allergists in the United States: Results of a cross-sectional survey","authors":"April L. Farrell,&nbsp;Erin M. Warshaw,&nbsp;Yanli Zhao,&nbsp;David Nelson","doi":"10.1053/ajcd.2002.36642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Background:</strong> Patch testing is considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis. Whereas previous surveys have evaluated the patch testing practices of dermatologists, little information is available on the use of patch testing by allergists. <strong>Objective:</strong> The objective of this study was to examine the prevalence of patch testing and associated methodologies used by allergists in the United States. <strong>Methods:</strong> A cross-sectional survey of all US Fellows of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology was conducted. <strong>Results:</strong> Of 1,239 questionnaires mailed, 519 (42%) were returned. Fifty-three percent of allergists reported performing patch testing. The majority (89%) patch tested 5 or fewer patients per month. Allergists who evaluated for latex allergy were twice as likely to patch test than those who did not. The most common patch test reading schedule was at both 48 and 72 hours (48%). Thirty-three percent of respondents performed only a single patch test reading. The majority (72%) used TRUE Test. Only 4% patch tested for Type IV allergy to dust mites. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> Many more allergists patch test than initially hypothesized. The patch testing methodologies used by allergists are similar to those of dermatologists.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7653,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Contact Dermatitis","volume":"13 4","pages":"Pages 157-163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1053/ajcd.2002.36642","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Contact Dermatitis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1046199X02000210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Background: Patch testing is considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis. Whereas previous surveys have evaluated the patch testing practices of dermatologists, little information is available on the use of patch testing by allergists. Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the prevalence of patch testing and associated methodologies used by allergists in the United States. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of all US Fellows of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology was conducted. Results: Of 1,239 questionnaires mailed, 519 (42%) were returned. Fifty-three percent of allergists reported performing patch testing. The majority (89%) patch tested 5 or fewer patients per month. Allergists who evaluated for latex allergy were twice as likely to patch test than those who did not. The most common patch test reading schedule was at both 48 and 72 hours (48%). Thirty-three percent of respondents performed only a single patch test reading. The majority (72%) used TRUE Test. Only 4% patch tested for Type IV allergy to dust mites. Conclusion: Many more allergists patch test than initially hypothesized. The patch testing methodologies used by allergists are similar to those of dermatologists.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国过敏症专家补丁测试的流行和方法:一项横断面调查的结果
背景:斑贴试验被认为是诊断过敏性接触性皮炎的金标准。虽然以前的调查已经评估了皮肤科医生的补丁测试实践,但很少有关于过敏症医生使用补丁测试的信息。目的:本研究的目的是检查美国过敏专科医生使用的补丁测试和相关方法的流行程度。方法:对美国过敏、哮喘和免疫学学会所有美国研究员进行横断面调查。结果:共发放问卷1239份,回收问卷519份(42%)。53%的过敏症专家报告说他们做过斑贴试验。大多数(89%)患者每月进行5次或更少的贴片测试。对乳胶过敏进行评估的过敏症专家进行斑贴试验的可能性是没有进行斑贴试验的人的两倍。最常见的斑贴测试阅读时间表是48和72小时(48%)。33%的受访者只进行了一次补丁测试阅读。大多数人(72%)使用TRUE测试。只有4%的人对尘螨进行了IV型过敏的贴片测试。结论:过敏症患者进行斑贴试验的人数比最初假设的要多。过敏症专家使用的补丁测试方法与皮肤科医生的方法相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ALLERGIC CONTACT DERMATITIS OF THE FEET LONG-TERM STUDY ON PRIMARY PREVENTION OF IRRITANT CONTACT DERMATITIS A REVIEW OF PATCH TESTING WITH PRESERVATIVES AT ST. JOHNʼS INSTITUTE OF DERMATOLOGY FROM 1995 TO 2000 CONTACT ALLERGY TO METAL AND TOTAL JOINT ARTHROPLASTY QUALITY OF LIFE ANALYSIS IN PATIENTS WITH HAND DERMATITIS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1