Products containing biocides: perceptions and realities.

M S Favero
{"title":"Products containing biocides: perceptions and realities.","authors":"M S Favero","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The mechanisms of action for chemical germicides and antibiotics for inactivating microorganisms are significantly different and methods for determining resistance by microorganisms to these agents are also different. Chemical germicides usually have multiple targets and the mechanisms for inactivation and resistance are not measured in absolute terms but rather in the rapidity with which they reduce levels of microorganisms. The term tolerance is much more suited for germicides than the term resistance. The mechanism of resistance to chemical germicides is often dependent on the concentration of the germicide. At high concentrations multiple cellular and metabolic targets are involved, and at low concentrations fewer cellular targets. In contrast antibiotics usually have a singular cellular or metabolic target and resistance implies the ability of the microorganism to grow in the presence of the antibiotic, and in a clinical sense, to initiate or continue infection in the presence of the antibiotic. When methods used to assess resistance to antibiotics are applied to chemical germicides, inappropriate interpretations can be made regarding the ability of microorganisms to develop resistance to antibiotics as a result of developing resistance to chemical germicides. The use of chemical germicides in health-care institutions and especially the home setting has increased in recent years. Although there may be an overuse of germicides in these settings the consequence is a cost issue and not one that involves the development of antibiotic resistant microorganisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":79733,"journal":{"name":"Symposium series (Society for Applied Microbiology)","volume":" 31","pages":"72S-77S"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Symposium series (Society for Applied Microbiology)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The mechanisms of action for chemical germicides and antibiotics for inactivating microorganisms are significantly different and methods for determining resistance by microorganisms to these agents are also different. Chemical germicides usually have multiple targets and the mechanisms for inactivation and resistance are not measured in absolute terms but rather in the rapidity with which they reduce levels of microorganisms. The term tolerance is much more suited for germicides than the term resistance. The mechanism of resistance to chemical germicides is often dependent on the concentration of the germicide. At high concentrations multiple cellular and metabolic targets are involved, and at low concentrations fewer cellular targets. In contrast antibiotics usually have a singular cellular or metabolic target and resistance implies the ability of the microorganism to grow in the presence of the antibiotic, and in a clinical sense, to initiate or continue infection in the presence of the antibiotic. When methods used to assess resistance to antibiotics are applied to chemical germicides, inappropriate interpretations can be made regarding the ability of microorganisms to develop resistance to antibiotics as a result of developing resistance to chemical germicides. The use of chemical germicides in health-care institutions and especially the home setting has increased in recent years. Although there may be an overuse of germicides in these settings the consequence is a cost issue and not one that involves the development of antibiotic resistant microorganisms.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
含有杀菌剂的产品:认知与现实。
用于灭活微生物的化学杀菌剂和抗生素的作用机制明显不同,测定微生物对这些药物的耐药性的方法也不同。化学杀菌剂通常有多个靶点,灭活和耐药性的机制不能以绝对数量来衡量,而是以它们降低微生物水平的速度来衡量。“耐受性”一词比“抗性”一词更适合于描述杀菌剂。对化学杀菌剂的抗性机制往往取决于杀菌剂的浓度。高浓度时涉及多个细胞和代谢靶点,低浓度时涉及较少的细胞靶点。相反,抗生素通常具有单一的细胞或代谢靶点,耐药性意味着微生物在抗生素存在下生长的能力,从临床意义上讲,在抗生素存在下启动或继续感染。当用于评估抗生素耐药性的方法应用于化学杀菌剂时,可能会对微生物因对化学杀菌剂产生耐药性而对抗生素产生耐药性的能力作出不适当的解释。近年来,在保健机构,特别是在家庭环境中使用化学杀菌剂的情况有所增加。虽然在这些环境中可能会过度使用杀菌剂,但后果是成本问题,而不是涉及抗生素耐药微生物的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Biofilms in vitro and in vivo: do singular mechanisms imply cross-resistance? Biocide use in the food industry and the disinfectant resistance of persistent strains of Listeria monocytogenes and Escherichia coli. Introduction of biocides into clinical practice and the impact on antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Quantitative assessment of risk reduction from hand washing with antibacterial soaps. Significance of biocide usage and antimicrobial resistance in domiciliary environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1