[Prospective randomized trial of intravenous ciprofloxacin for prevention of bacterial infection in cirrhotic patients with esophageal variceal bleeding].

Sung Noh Hong, Beom Jin Kim, Sun Young Lee, Choon Young Lee, Min Kyu Ryu, Moon Seok Choi, Joon Hyoek Lee, Poong Lyul Rhee, Kwang Cheol Koh, Jae J Kim, Seung Woon Paik, Jong Chul Rhee, Kyoo Wan Choi
{"title":"[Prospective randomized trial of intravenous ciprofloxacin for prevention of bacterial infection in cirrhotic patients with esophageal variceal bleeding].","authors":"Sung Noh Hong,&nbsp;Beom Jin Kim,&nbsp;Sun Young Lee,&nbsp;Choon Young Lee,&nbsp;Min Kyu Ryu,&nbsp;Moon Seok Choi,&nbsp;Joon Hyoek Lee,&nbsp;Poong Lyul Rhee,&nbsp;Kwang Cheol Koh,&nbsp;Jae J Kim,&nbsp;Seung Woon Paik,&nbsp;Jong Chul Rhee,&nbsp;Kyoo Wan Choi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>In cirrhotic patients with esophageal variceal bleeding, bacterial infections are a frequent complication. Oral antibiotic prophylaxis decreases the incidence of bacterial infections. The administration of oral antibiotics, however, may be difficult in some cirrhotic patients with active bleeding. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of prophylactic intravenous antibiotics for the prevention of bacterial infections in cirrhotic patients with esophageal variceal bleeding.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From December 1998 to September 2001, a total of 40 consecutive cirrhotic patients with Child-Pugh class B or C were enrolled after emergent endoscopic esophageal variceal ligation (EVL) was taken because of esophageal variceal bleeding. Enrolled patients were randomized into a treatment group and a control group. The treatment group (n=20) received the intravenous ciprofloxacin 200mg IV q 12 hours for 3 days while the control group(n=20) didn,t.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bacterial infection developed in nine patients (45%) of the control group and only two patients (10%) in the treatment group. The incidence of bacterial infections was significantly lower in the treatment group than the control group (p < 0.005). The hospital cost and length of hospital stay decreased in the treatment group compared with the control group (p < 0.001). There were no differences in the hospital course and mortality within 30 days between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In cirrhotic patients with variceal bleeding and with Child-Pugh class B or C, the use of intravenous ciprofloxacin for 3 days after EVL was not only effective in the prevention of bacterial infections but also cost-effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":85610,"journal":{"name":"Taehan Kan Hakhoe chi = The Korean journal of hepatology","volume":"8 3","pages":"288-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taehan Kan Hakhoe chi = The Korean journal of hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims: In cirrhotic patients with esophageal variceal bleeding, bacterial infections are a frequent complication. Oral antibiotic prophylaxis decreases the incidence of bacterial infections. The administration of oral antibiotics, however, may be difficult in some cirrhotic patients with active bleeding. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of prophylactic intravenous antibiotics for the prevention of bacterial infections in cirrhotic patients with esophageal variceal bleeding.

Methods: From December 1998 to September 2001, a total of 40 consecutive cirrhotic patients with Child-Pugh class B or C were enrolled after emergent endoscopic esophageal variceal ligation (EVL) was taken because of esophageal variceal bleeding. Enrolled patients were randomized into a treatment group and a control group. The treatment group (n=20) received the intravenous ciprofloxacin 200mg IV q 12 hours for 3 days while the control group(n=20) didn,t.

Results: Bacterial infection developed in nine patients (45%) of the control group and only two patients (10%) in the treatment group. The incidence of bacterial infections was significantly lower in the treatment group than the control group (p < 0.005). The hospital cost and length of hospital stay decreased in the treatment group compared with the control group (p < 0.001). There were no differences in the hospital course and mortality within 30 days between the two groups.

Conclusions: In cirrhotic patients with variceal bleeding and with Child-Pugh class B or C, the use of intravenous ciprofloxacin for 3 days after EVL was not only effective in the prevention of bacterial infections but also cost-effective.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[静脉注射环丙沙星预防肝硬化食管静脉曲张出血患者细菌感染的前瞻性随机试验]。
背景/目的:在伴有食管静脉曲张出血的肝硬化患者中,细菌感染是常见的并发症。口服抗生素预防可降低细菌感染的发生率。口服抗生素的管理,然而,可能是困难的一些肝硬化患者的活动性出血。本研究的目的是评估预防性静脉注射抗生素预防肝硬化食管静脉曲张出血患者细菌感染的疗效。方法:1998年12月至2001年9月,对40例因食管静脉曲张出血而行急诊内镜下食管静脉曲张结扎术(EVL)的Child-Pugh B级或C级肝硬化患者进行研究。入组患者随机分为治疗组和对照组。治疗组(n=20)静脉滴注环丙沙星200mg,每12小时静脉滴注,连用3 d;对照组(n=20)不滴注。结果:对照组9例(45%)发生细菌感染,治疗组2例(10%)发生细菌感染。治疗组细菌感染发生率明显低于对照组(p < 0.005)。治疗组住院费用和住院时间较对照组降低(p < 0.001)。两组患者的住院时间和30天内死亡率均无差异。结论:肝硬化合并静脉曲张出血且Child-Pugh分级为B级或C级的患者,EVL后静脉注射环丙沙星3天不仅可有效预防细菌感染,而且具有成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[The significance of urine sodium measurement after furosemide administration in diuretics-unresponsive patients with liver cirrhosis]. [A case of toxic hepatitis induced by habitual glue sniffing]. New antiviral therapies for hepatitis C. [Recent changes of organism and treatment in pyogenic liver abscess]. [Serum ALT and HBV DNA levels in patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1