[Comparative studies of total extraperitoneal hernioplasty in combined spinal epidural anesthesia versus balanced general anesthesia].

Anaesthesiologie und Reanimation Pub Date : 2002-01-01
Th Hirschberg, D Olthoff, P Börner
{"title":"[Comparative studies of total extraperitoneal hernioplasty in combined spinal epidural anesthesia versus balanced general anesthesia].","authors":"Th Hirschberg,&nbsp;D Olthoff,&nbsp;P Börner","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To appraise the clinical impact of combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia (CSE) in patients undergoing total extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair (TEPP), we performed a prospective study in 40 patients. These patients were randomized to receive either CSE (n = 20) or a balanced general anaesthesia (BGA) with controlled ventilation (n = 20). The aim of the study was to determine the impact of the intraoperative gas insufflation on compensatory respiratory reactions during regional anaesthesia. Therefore, blood gas samples were drawn and additional parameters were assessed as follows: noninvasive haemodynamic, lactate and glucose levels, differential blood count, and the patients' level of comfort during the perioperative setting, which was determined by a questionnaire. In our study it was clarified that the respiratory compensation of extraperitoneal gas insufflation is not decreased by regional anaesthesia. The haemodynamic state of the patients was stabilized by early interventions. In addition--there was no evidence that the anaesthesia regime used had any influence on the so called stress-parameters. Most of the patients with regional anaesthesia showed severe agitation often accompanied by chest pain. Hence, regional anaesthesia is not recommended in this setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":76993,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesiologie und Reanimation","volume":"27 6","pages":"144-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesiologie und Reanimation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To appraise the clinical impact of combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia (CSE) in patients undergoing total extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair (TEPP), we performed a prospective study in 40 patients. These patients were randomized to receive either CSE (n = 20) or a balanced general anaesthesia (BGA) with controlled ventilation (n = 20). The aim of the study was to determine the impact of the intraoperative gas insufflation on compensatory respiratory reactions during regional anaesthesia. Therefore, blood gas samples were drawn and additional parameters were assessed as follows: noninvasive haemodynamic, lactate and glucose levels, differential blood count, and the patients' level of comfort during the perioperative setting, which was determined by a questionnaire. In our study it was clarified that the respiratory compensation of extraperitoneal gas insufflation is not decreased by regional anaesthesia. The haemodynamic state of the patients was stabilized by early interventions. In addition--there was no evidence that the anaesthesia regime used had any influence on the so called stress-parameters. Most of the patients with regional anaesthesia showed severe agitation often accompanied by chest pain. Hence, regional anaesthesia is not recommended in this setting.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[脊髓硬膜外联合麻醉与平衡全麻下全腹膜外疝成形术的比较研究]。
为了评估脊髓-硬膜外联合麻醉(CSE)对全腹腔镜疝修补术(TEPP)患者的临床影响,我们对40例患者进行了前瞻性研究。这些患者随机接受CSE (n = 20)或平衡全身麻醉(BGA)和控制通气(n = 20)。本研究的目的是确定术中气体注入对区域麻醉时代偿呼吸反应的影响。因此,抽取血气样本并评估其他参数如下:无创血流动力学、乳酸和血糖水平、差异血细胞计数以及围手术期患者的舒适水平,这些参数通过问卷调查确定。在我们的研究中,它澄清了呼吸代偿腹膜外气体注入不减少区域麻醉。早期干预使患者血流动力学状态稳定。此外,没有证据表明麻醉方式对所谓的压力参数有任何影响。大部分局部麻醉患者表现为剧烈躁动,常伴有胸痛。因此,在这种情况下不建议使用区域麻醉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Regional anaesthesia versus general anaesthesia--pathophysiology and clinical implications]. [Analgesia, sedation and anaesthesia in emergency service]. [The influence of normobaric hyperoxia on hepatic oxygenation--experience with an animal model]. [Perioperative management of a patient with alcaptonuria--a case report]. [Implantable drug pumps for spinal opioid analgesia: technical solutions and problems].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1