"Speak to me as to thy thinkings" commentary on 'Interpersonal psychoanalysis' radical façade" by Irwin Hirsch.

Philip M Bromberg
{"title":"\"Speak to me as to thy thinkings\" commentary on 'Interpersonal psychoanalysis' radical façade\" by Irwin Hirsch.","authors":"Philip M Bromberg","doi":"10.1521/jaap.30.4.605.24195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article has two purposes. First, a rebuttal to those writers, including Irwin Hirsch, who criticize the current emphasis by relational analysts on the value of affective openness and affective honesty, particularly with regard to their use of clinical vignettes that vividly portray the analyst's use of self-revelation--as if these illustrations were revealing an endorsement of a naive and mindless invasion of the patient's psyche. The second, and perhaps more important purpose, is to illuminate something I feel is obscured by Hirsch's framing the topic of the analyst's \"spontaneity\" in the context of analytic politics--that an analyst's self-revelation in language is increasingly understood to be not simply \"allowable,\" but a necessary part of the clinical process. Language does not make it less spontaneous nor part of what Hirsch calls a \"standardized technique.\" Its most powerful therapeutic contribution is in facilitating linguistic symbolization of dissociated, enacted, subsymbolic experience that is immune to self-reflective cognition, immune to internal conflict, and thereby unavailable to interpretation until it becomes relationally accessible to language and thought. Both neuroscience and cognitive research support the need for a revised theory of therapeutic action consistent with the growing recognition of the human mind as a nonlinear, self-organizing dynamic system-a system in which normal maturation as well as therapeutic repair depends, developmentally, on an ineffable coming together of two minds in an unpredictable way. From this vantage point, the analyst's self-revelation contributes to the coconstruction of an alive intersubjective space through an ongoing process of engagement between two subjectivities, making the analyst's subjective openness as potentially negotiable as any other aspect of the patient/analyst relationship, rather than an unrepairable \"intrusion\" into a self-contained psyche.</p>","PeriodicalId":76662,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis","volume":"30 4","pages":"605-20; discussion 621-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1521/jaap.30.4.605.24195","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1521/jaap.30.4.605.24195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

This article has two purposes. First, a rebuttal to those writers, including Irwin Hirsch, who criticize the current emphasis by relational analysts on the value of affective openness and affective honesty, particularly with regard to their use of clinical vignettes that vividly portray the analyst's use of self-revelation--as if these illustrations were revealing an endorsement of a naive and mindless invasion of the patient's psyche. The second, and perhaps more important purpose, is to illuminate something I feel is obscured by Hirsch's framing the topic of the analyst's "spontaneity" in the context of analytic politics--that an analyst's self-revelation in language is increasingly understood to be not simply "allowable," but a necessary part of the clinical process. Language does not make it less spontaneous nor part of what Hirsch calls a "standardized technique." Its most powerful therapeutic contribution is in facilitating linguistic symbolization of dissociated, enacted, subsymbolic experience that is immune to self-reflective cognition, immune to internal conflict, and thereby unavailable to interpretation until it becomes relationally accessible to language and thought. Both neuroscience and cognitive research support the need for a revised theory of therapeutic action consistent with the growing recognition of the human mind as a nonlinear, self-organizing dynamic system-a system in which normal maturation as well as therapeutic repair depends, developmentally, on an ineffable coming together of two minds in an unpredictable way. From this vantage point, the analyst's self-revelation contributes to the coconstruction of an alive intersubjective space through an ongoing process of engagement between two subjectivities, making the analyst's subjective openness as potentially negotiable as any other aspect of the patient/analyst relationship, rather than an unrepairable "intrusion" into a self-contained psyche.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"跟我谈谈你的想法"对欧文·赫希的《人际精神分析》的评论。
本文有两个目的。首先,对包括欧文·赫希(Irwin Hirsch)在内的一些作家的反驳,他们批评关系分析师目前强调情感开放和情感诚实的价值,尤其是他们使用临床小插图,生动地描绘了分析师对自我启示的使用——就好像这些插图揭示了对患者心灵天真和无意识入侵的认可。第二个,也许是更重要的目的,是阐明一些我觉得被赫希在分析政治背景下构建分析师的“自发性”主题所掩盖的东西——分析师在语言中的自我启示越来越被理解为不仅仅是“允许的”,而是临床过程的必要部分。语言并没有减少它的自发性,也没有成为赫希所说的“标准化技术”的一部分。它最强大的治疗贡献是促进分离的、制定的、亚符号经验的语言符号化,这些经验不受自我反思认知的影响,不受内部冲突的影响,因此无法解释,直到它变得相对容易被语言和思想所理解。神经科学和认知研究都支持对治疗作用理论进行修正的必要性,这与越来越多的人认识到人类思维是一个非线性的、自组织的动态系统相一致——在这个系统中,正常的成熟和治疗修复在发展上依赖于两种思维以不可预测的方式不可言喻地结合在一起。从这个有利的角度来看,分析师的自我揭示有助于通过两个主体性之间持续的接触过程来构建一个活跃的主体间空间,使分析师的主观开放性与患者/分析师关系的任何其他方面一样具有潜在的可协商性,而不是对一个独立的心灵的不可修复的“入侵”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Illustration of the Irreducible Subjectivity in Interpreting Data—Clinical or Written: A Reply to Philip Bromberg Commentary on “Bion's Grid: A Tool for Transformation” by Marilyn Charles Commentary on “Jihad, McWorld and Enactment in the Postmodern Mental Health World” by Eric M. Plakun Commentary on " Mortal Gifts: A Two-Part Essay on the Therapist' s Mortality" by Ellen Pinsky Commentary on “Behind, Beneath, Above, and Beyond: The Historical Unconscious,” by Timothy J. Zeddies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1