Shear strength of sealants placed with non-rinse conditioning compared to a conventional acid etch-rinse technique.

Anna B Fuks, Eliezer Eidelman, Israel Lewinstein
{"title":"Shear strength of sealants placed with non-rinse conditioning compared to a conventional acid etch-rinse technique.","authors":"Anna B Fuks,&nbsp;Eliezer Eidelman,&nbsp;Israel Lewinstein","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study compared the shearing strength of a non-rinse conditioning (NRC) compomer sealant to that of a conventional sealant. Thirty molars and premolars were sectioned longitudinally. The resulting halves were divided into 4 groups. Cylinders of sealants were bonded to the sections using a gelatin capsule as a matrix, as follows: Group A (n = 15) NRC + Prime & Bond + Dyract Seal; Group B (n = 15) same as group A but with phosphoric acid and rinse; Group C (n = 15) conventional phosphoric acid + Helioseal; Group D (n = 15) NRC + Helioseal. After immersing the specimens in water for 7 days, the samples were mounted on the Instron testing machine at a 20 mm/min crosshead speed. The results were subjected to ANOVA with Scheffe test, with a significant level of .05. No shearing strength values could be obtained for the specimens of group D. Some cylinders separated from the enamel while still immersed in the water, and in others the adhesion was too low, and no readings could be observed. For all groups, failure occurred at the sealant-enamel interface. The mean value for group A was 5.33 MPa, significantly less than that of groups B 9.12 MPa and C 9.63 MPa (p < 0.006). No significant difference of the mean shear strength was evident between groups B and C. No rinse conditioning with Dyract Seal led to a considerably lower bond strength value than Dyract Seal and Helioseal with phosphoric acid and rinsing.</p>","PeriodicalId":75566,"journal":{"name":"ASDC journal of dentistry for children","volume":"69 3","pages":"239-42, 233"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASDC journal of dentistry for children","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study compared the shearing strength of a non-rinse conditioning (NRC) compomer sealant to that of a conventional sealant. Thirty molars and premolars were sectioned longitudinally. The resulting halves were divided into 4 groups. Cylinders of sealants were bonded to the sections using a gelatin capsule as a matrix, as follows: Group A (n = 15) NRC + Prime & Bond + Dyract Seal; Group B (n = 15) same as group A but with phosphoric acid and rinse; Group C (n = 15) conventional phosphoric acid + Helioseal; Group D (n = 15) NRC + Helioseal. After immersing the specimens in water for 7 days, the samples were mounted on the Instron testing machine at a 20 mm/min crosshead speed. The results were subjected to ANOVA with Scheffe test, with a significant level of .05. No shearing strength values could be obtained for the specimens of group D. Some cylinders separated from the enamel while still immersed in the water, and in others the adhesion was too low, and no readings could be observed. For all groups, failure occurred at the sealant-enamel interface. The mean value for group A was 5.33 MPa, significantly less than that of groups B 9.12 MPa and C 9.63 MPa (p < 0.006). No significant difference of the mean shear strength was evident between groups B and C. No rinse conditioning with Dyract Seal led to a considerably lower bond strength value than Dyract Seal and Helioseal with phosphoric acid and rinsing.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与传统的酸蚀刻-漂洗技术相比,非漂洗条件下密封胶的剪切强度。
本研究比较了非漂洗调理(NRC)复合密封胶与常规密封胶的剪切强度。纵切30颗磨牙和前磨牙。将结果分成4组。以明胶胶囊为基质,将密封胶圆柱体粘接在切片上,方法如下:a组(n = 15) NRC + Prime & Bond + Dyract Seal;B组(n = 15)与A组相同,但加磷酸和漂洗;C组(n = 15)常规磷酸+ Helioseal;D组(n = 15) NRC + Helioseal。试样在水中浸泡7天后,以20 mm/min的十字速度安装在Instron试验机上。结果采用Scheffe检验进行方差分析,显著性水平为0.05。d组试样没有得到抗剪强度的数值,有的钢瓶还浸在水中就与珐琅质分离,有的钢瓶附着力过低,没有观察到读数。对于所有组,失效发生在密封-牙釉质界面。A组平均为5.33 MPa,显著低于B组9.12 MPa和C组9.63 MPa (p < 0.006)。平均抗剪强度在B组和c组之间无显著差异。未经Dyract Seal冲洗处理导致黏结强度值明显低于Dyract Seal和Helioseal经磷酸和冲洗处理的黏结强度值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sports Dentistry A psychotic reaction to dental care--a case report. Single-Parent Families Children of Divorce: Stories of Loss and Growth Soda pop controversy/conspiracy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1