Comparative evaluation of different modes of a national accident and emergency department-based injury surveillance system: Jamaican experience.

Sharon Arscott-Mills, Yvette Holder, Georgiana Gordon
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of different modes of a national accident and emergency department-based injury surveillance system: Jamaican experience.","authors":"Sharon Arscott-Mills,&nbsp;Yvette Holder,&nbsp;Georgiana Gordon","doi":"10.1076/icsp.9.4.235.13683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective was to conduct a comparative evaluation of two injury surveillance systems in operation in the Accident and Emergency departments of public hospitals in Jamaica. The evaluation was conducted at 12 hospitals across Jamaica offering varying levels of service delivery. It was designed in three phases: (1) a retrospective review of surveillance system data; (2) prospective process evaluation; (3) system environment evaluation. These data were analysed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the manual Accident & Emergency Statistical Report (A&ESR) versus the computer-based Patient administration system/Jamaica injury surveillance system (PAS/JISS), and to determine an injury registration rate. Results showed a variation from 8% to 27% in injury registration rates at the hospitals reviewed. The sensitivity of the computer-based PAS ranged from 29.7% to 97.1% while the sensitivity of the manual system ranged from 22.1% to 100%. The computer-based system generally detected a greater percentage of injuries. Problems were identified with missing data fields in the computer-based system, while problems of recording and transcription were identified in the manually-based system. Recommendations were made to improve data quality in both data collection systems. Although shortcomings were identified with the A&ESR, the system is performing the function for which it was designed, that of tracking A&E workload. The PAS/JISS is more user-friendly and a truer reflection of the injury situation.</p>","PeriodicalId":84914,"journal":{"name":"Injury control and safety promotion","volume":"9 4","pages":"235-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1076/icsp.9.4.235.13683","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury control and safety promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1076/icsp.9.4.235.13683","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The objective was to conduct a comparative evaluation of two injury surveillance systems in operation in the Accident and Emergency departments of public hospitals in Jamaica. The evaluation was conducted at 12 hospitals across Jamaica offering varying levels of service delivery. It was designed in three phases: (1) a retrospective review of surveillance system data; (2) prospective process evaluation; (3) system environment evaluation. These data were analysed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the manual Accident & Emergency Statistical Report (A&ESR) versus the computer-based Patient administration system/Jamaica injury surveillance system (PAS/JISS), and to determine an injury registration rate. Results showed a variation from 8% to 27% in injury registration rates at the hospitals reviewed. The sensitivity of the computer-based PAS ranged from 29.7% to 97.1% while the sensitivity of the manual system ranged from 22.1% to 100%. The computer-based system generally detected a greater percentage of injuries. Problems were identified with missing data fields in the computer-based system, while problems of recording and transcription were identified in the manually-based system. Recommendations were made to improve data quality in both data collection systems. Although shortcomings were identified with the A&ESR, the system is performing the function for which it was designed, that of tracking A&E workload. The PAS/JISS is more user-friendly and a truer reflection of the injury situation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于事故和急诊部门的国家伤害监测系统的不同模式的比较评价:牙买加的经验。
目的是对在牙买加公立医院急诊科运行的两种伤害监测系统进行比较评价。评估是在牙买加各地提供不同程度服务的12家医院进行的。它的设计分为三个阶段:(1)对监测系统数据进行回顾性审查;(2)前瞻性工艺评价;(3)系统环境评价。对这些数据进行分析,以确定手工事故和紧急统计报告(A&ESR)与基于计算机的患者管理系统/牙买加伤害监测系统(PAS/JISS)的敏感性和特异性,并确定伤害登记率。结果显示,在所调查的医院中,受伤登记率从8%到27%不等。基于计算机的PAS灵敏度为29.7% ~ 97.1%,而手动系统的灵敏度为22.1% ~ 100%。基于计算机的系统通常检测到更高比例的伤害。在以计算机为基础的系统中确定了缺少数据字段的问题,而在以手动为基础的系统中确定了记录和转录的问题。提出了改进这两个数据收集系统的数据质量的建议。虽然发现了A&ESR的缺点,但该系统正在执行其设计的功能,即跟踪A&E工作量。PAS/JISS更方便使用,更真实地反映了受伤情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using an electronic medical record system to describe injury epidemiology and health care utilization at an inner-city hospital in Indiana. Skiing and snowboarding injuries and their impact on the emergency care system in South Tyrol: a restrospective analysis for the winter season 2001--2002. School backpack weights: a survey of students in Ghana, Guatemala and the USA. Patient payment for emergency medical services treatment and its impact on injury control: an Alberta case. International collaborative effort on injury statistics: 10-year review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1