Chinese adolescents' perceptions of family functioning: personal, school-related, and family correlates.

Daniel T L Shek
{"title":"Chinese adolescents' perceptions of family functioning: personal, school-related, and family correlates.","authors":"Daniel T L Shek","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The author used two translated measures (Self-Report Family Inventory; D. T. L. Shek, 1998); and Family Assessment Device; N. B. Epstein, L. M. Baldwin, & D. S. Bishop, 1983) and a locally developed scale (Chinese Family Assessment Instrument; D. T. L. Shek, in press-a) to assess 3,649 Chinese adolescents' perceptions of how well their families function. He found that boys perceived their families to function worse than did girls and that younger adolescents perceived their families to function better than did older adolescents. Perceived family functioning was negatively related to grade level; students attending schools with higher academic standards perceived their families to function better than did students attending schools with lower academic standards; and students attending government and aided schools had higher levels of family functioning than did students attending private schools. Family types (intact vs. nonintact families) and the duration of parents' stay in Hong Kong were also related to the adolescents' perceptions of family functioning. Findings for the personal, school-related, and family correlates of perceived family functioning were statistically significant and stable across different measures of family functioning, but the practical significance of the findings was not high.</p>","PeriodicalId":77145,"journal":{"name":"Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs","volume":"128 4","pages":"358-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The author used two translated measures (Self-Report Family Inventory; D. T. L. Shek, 1998); and Family Assessment Device; N. B. Epstein, L. M. Baldwin, & D. S. Bishop, 1983) and a locally developed scale (Chinese Family Assessment Instrument; D. T. L. Shek, in press-a) to assess 3,649 Chinese adolescents' perceptions of how well their families function. He found that boys perceived their families to function worse than did girls and that younger adolescents perceived their families to function better than did older adolescents. Perceived family functioning was negatively related to grade level; students attending schools with higher academic standards perceived their families to function better than did students attending schools with lower academic standards; and students attending government and aided schools had higher levels of family functioning than did students attending private schools. Family types (intact vs. nonintact families) and the duration of parents' stay in Hong Kong were also related to the adolescents' perceptions of family functioning. Findings for the personal, school-related, and family correlates of perceived family functioning were statistically significant and stable across different measures of family functioning, but the practical significance of the findings was not high.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国青少年对家庭功能的认知:个人、学校和家庭相关。
作者使用了两种翻译的测量方法(自我报告家庭量表;石德立,1998);和家庭评估装置;N. B. Epstein, L. M. Baldwin, & D. S. Bishop, 1983)和本地开发的量表(中国家庭评估工具;D. T. L. Shek,出版a)评估3,649名中国青少年对其家庭运作好坏的看法。他发现,男孩比女孩更容易理解家庭的运作,而青少年比年长的青少年更容易理解家庭的运作。感知家庭功能与年级水平负相关;在学术水平较高的学校上学的学生比在学术水平较低的学校上学的学生认为他们的家庭运作得更好;公立学校和资助学校的学生比私立学校的学生有更高的家庭功能水平。家庭类型(完整家庭与非完整家庭)及父母在港逗留时间亦与青少年对家庭功能的认知有关。感知家庭功能的个人、学校相关和家庭相关的发现在不同的家庭功能测量中具有统计学意义和稳定性,但研究结果的实际意义并不高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Psychologists versus psychologists: evaluating the claims of psychologists who publicly criticize their profession. Creativity, intelligence, and personality: a critical review of the scattered literature. Using epistemic ratios to evaluate hypotheses: an imprecision penalty for imprecise hypotheses. Measuring the value of nonwage employee benefits: building a model of the relation between benefit satisfaction and value. The cognition of deception: the role of executive processes in producing lies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1