Emergency medicine crisis resource management (EMCRM): pilot study of a simulation-based crisis management course for emergency medicine.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Academic Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2003-04-01 DOI:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb01354.x
Martin Reznek, Rebecca Smith-Coggins, Steven Howard, Kanthi Kiran, Phillip Harter, Yasser Sowb, David Gaba, Thomas Krummel
{"title":"Emergency medicine crisis resource management (EMCRM): pilot study of a simulation-based crisis management course for emergency medicine.","authors":"Martin Reznek,&nbsp;Rebecca Smith-Coggins,&nbsp;Steven Howard,&nbsp;Kanthi Kiran,&nbsp;Phillip Harter,&nbsp;Yasser Sowb,&nbsp;David Gaba,&nbsp;Thomas Krummel","doi":"10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb01354.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine participant perceptions of Emergency Medicine Crisis Resource Management (EMCRM), a simulation-based crisis management course for emergency medicine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>EMCRM was created using Anesthesia Crisis Resource Management (ACRM) as a template. Thirteen residents participated in one of three pilot courses of EMCRM; following a didactic session on principles of human error and crisis management, the residents participated in simulated emergency department crisis scenarios and instructor-facilitated debriefing. The crisis simulations involved a computer-enhanced mannequin simulator and standardized patients. After finishing the course, study subjects completed a horizontal numerical scale survey (1 = worst rating to 5 = best rating) of their perceptions of EMCRM. Descriptive statistics were calculated to evaluate the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study subjects found EMCRM to be enjoyable (4.9 +/- 0.3) (mean +/- SD) and reported that the knowledge gained from the course would be helpful in their practices (4.5 +/- 0.6). The subjects believed that the simulation environment prompted realistic responses (4.6 +/- 0.8) and that the scenarios were highly believable (4.8 +/- 0.4). The participants reported that EMCRM was best suited for residents (4.9 +/- 0.3) but could also benefit students and attending physicians. The subjects believed that the course should be repeated every 8.2 +/- 3.3 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The EMCRM participants rated the course very favorably and believed that the knowledge gained would be beneficial in their practices. The extremely positive response to EMCRM found in this pilot study suggests that this training modality may be valuable in training emergency medicine residents.</p>","PeriodicalId":7105,"journal":{"name":"Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":"10 4","pages":"386-9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2003-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb01354.x","citationCount":"221","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb01354.x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 221

Abstract

Objectives: To determine participant perceptions of Emergency Medicine Crisis Resource Management (EMCRM), a simulation-based crisis management course for emergency medicine.

Methods: EMCRM was created using Anesthesia Crisis Resource Management (ACRM) as a template. Thirteen residents participated in one of three pilot courses of EMCRM; following a didactic session on principles of human error and crisis management, the residents participated in simulated emergency department crisis scenarios and instructor-facilitated debriefing. The crisis simulations involved a computer-enhanced mannequin simulator and standardized patients. After finishing the course, study subjects completed a horizontal numerical scale survey (1 = worst rating to 5 = best rating) of their perceptions of EMCRM. Descriptive statistics were calculated to evaluate the data.

Results: The study subjects found EMCRM to be enjoyable (4.9 +/- 0.3) (mean +/- SD) and reported that the knowledge gained from the course would be helpful in their practices (4.5 +/- 0.6). The subjects believed that the simulation environment prompted realistic responses (4.6 +/- 0.8) and that the scenarios were highly believable (4.8 +/- 0.4). The participants reported that EMCRM was best suited for residents (4.9 +/- 0.3) but could also benefit students and attending physicians. The subjects believed that the course should be repeated every 8.2 +/- 3.3 months.

Conclusions: The EMCRM participants rated the course very favorably and believed that the knowledge gained would be beneficial in their practices. The extremely positive response to EMCRM found in this pilot study suggests that this training modality may be valuable in training emergency medicine residents.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊医学危机资源管理(EMCRM):基于模拟的急诊医学危机管理课程试点研究。
目的:确定参与者对急诊医学危机资源管理(EMCRM)的认知,EMCRM是一门基于模拟的急诊医学危机管理课程。方法:以麻醉危机资源管理(ACRM)为模板创建EMCRM。13名居民参加了EMCRM的三个试点课程之一;在关于人为错误和危机管理原则的教学课程之后,住院医生参加了模拟急诊科危机情景和由讲师指导的汇报。危机模拟包括计算机增强的人体模型模拟器和标准化的患者。课程结束后,研究对象完成了一项水平数值量表调查(1 =最差评分至5 =最佳评分),以了解他们对EMCRM的看法。采用描述性统计方法对数据进行评价。结果:研究对象认为EMCRM是令人愉快的(4.9 +/- 0.3)(平均+/- SD),并报告从课程中获得的知识将有助于他们的实践(4.5 +/- 0.6)。被试认为模拟环境促使了真实的反应(4.6 +/- 0.8),场景具有高度可信度(4.8 +/- 0.4)。参与者报告说,EMCRM最适合住院医师(4.9 +/- 0.3),但也可以使学生和主治医生受益。受试者认为应每8.2 +/- 3.3个月复课一次。结论:EMCRM参与者对课程评价非常好,并相信所获得的知识将对他们的实践有益。在这项初步研究中发现的对EMCRM的非常积极的反应表明,这种培训方式可能对培训急诊医学住院医师有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Emergency Medicine
Academic Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Emergency Medicine (AEM) is the official monthly publication of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) and publishes information relevant to the practice, educational advancements, and investigation of emergency medicine. It is the second-largest peer-reviewed scientific journal in the specialty of emergency medicine. The goal of AEM is to advance the science, education, and clinical practice of emergency medicine, to serve as a voice for the academic emergency medicine community, and to promote SAEM''s goals and objectives. Members and non-members worldwide depend on this journal for translational medicine relevant to emergency medicine, as well as for clinical news, case studies and more. Each issue contains information relevant to the research, educational advancements, and practice in emergency medicine. Subject matter is diverse, including preclinical studies, clinical topics, health policy, and educational methods. The research of SAEM members contributes significantly to the scientific content and development of the journal.
期刊最新文献
The moral injury of zeeple-zoople. Current use of push-dose epinephrine: Survey and interview results from academic clinicians in emergency medicine. Fixed-dose subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin versus adjusted-dose unfractionated heparin for venous thromboembolism treatment. Clinician-level variation in admission practices for common conditions in Veteran Affairs emergency departments. Intravenous Magnesium: Prompt use for Asthma in Children Treated in the Emergency Department (IMPACT-ED), a pilot randomized trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1