Postmenopausal osteoporosis risk management in primary care: how well does it adhere to national practice guidelines?

Gina S Wei, Jeffrey L Jackson, Patrick G O'Malley
{"title":"Postmenopausal osteoporosis risk management in primary care: how well does it adhere to national practice guidelines?","authors":"Gina S Wei,&nbsp;Jeffrey L Jackson,&nbsp;Patrick G O'Malley","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) practice guideline provides explicit recommendations for postmenopausal osteoporosis risk assessment and management. This study evaluated primary care adherence to the recommendations and factors associated with such adherence.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Postmenopausal women 40 years old and older were sampled in the primary care clinic of a US tertiary hospital. We received 469 completed questionnaires that measured the respondent's demographics and osteoporosis risk factors; current and historical osteoporosis counseling, testing, and treatment; and whether or not she had a primary care clinician. Based on information provided, we determined whether each woman was receiving care that followed the NOF guideline. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified factors associated with guideline adherence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age was 69 years; 53% were white and 38% black; 15% had prior fractures. Using NOF criteria, 19.8 % were at moderate risk and 80.2 % were at high risk for osteoporosis. Overall, 57.6% (95% confidence interval 53.1, 62.1) of patients received risk management in accordance with the NOF guideline. The adherence rate was higher in the high-risk group (60.9% v 44.1%, p=.003), in those who had primary care clinicians (62.0% v 43.5%, p=.006), and in nonblack patients (white v black 67.1% v 43.0%, p<.001; other v black 65.0% v 43.0%, p=.012). These associations remained statistically significant after multivariate adjustments. Adherence was not associated with the sex of the primary care clinician.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>More than half of postmenopausal women in our study were receiving osteoporosis risk management that followed the NOF practice guideline. Those who were at higher risk, who were not black, or who had primary care clinicians were more likely to receive care in accordance with the NOF guideline, regardless of the sex of the clinician.</p>","PeriodicalId":76028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Women's Association (1972)","volume":"58 2","pages":"99-104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Women's Association (1972)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) practice guideline provides explicit recommendations for postmenopausal osteoporosis risk assessment and management. This study evaluated primary care adherence to the recommendations and factors associated with such adherence.

Method: Postmenopausal women 40 years old and older were sampled in the primary care clinic of a US tertiary hospital. We received 469 completed questionnaires that measured the respondent's demographics and osteoporosis risk factors; current and historical osteoporosis counseling, testing, and treatment; and whether or not she had a primary care clinician. Based on information provided, we determined whether each woman was receiving care that followed the NOF guideline. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified factors associated with guideline adherence.

Results: Mean age was 69 years; 53% were white and 38% black; 15% had prior fractures. Using NOF criteria, 19.8 % were at moderate risk and 80.2 % were at high risk for osteoporosis. Overall, 57.6% (95% confidence interval 53.1, 62.1) of patients received risk management in accordance with the NOF guideline. The adherence rate was higher in the high-risk group (60.9% v 44.1%, p=.003), in those who had primary care clinicians (62.0% v 43.5%, p=.006), and in nonblack patients (white v black 67.1% v 43.0%, p<.001; other v black 65.0% v 43.0%, p=.012). These associations remained statistically significant after multivariate adjustments. Adherence was not associated with the sex of the primary care clinician.

Conclusions: More than half of postmenopausal women in our study were receiving osteoporosis risk management that followed the NOF practice guideline. Those who were at higher risk, who were not black, or who had primary care clinicians were more likely to receive care in accordance with the NOF guideline, regardless of the sex of the clinician.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初级保健中的绝经后骨质疏松症风险管理:如何很好地遵守国家实践指南?
目的:国家骨质疏松基金会(NOF)实践指南为绝经后骨质疏松症风险评估和管理提供了明确的建议。本研究评估了对建议的初级保健依从性以及与这种依从性相关的因素。方法:绝经后妇女40岁及以上的抽样在美国三级医院的初级保健诊所。我们收到了469份完整的问卷,测量了受访者的人口统计学和骨质疏松症的危险因素;当前和历史骨质疏松咨询、检测和治疗;以及她是否有初级保健临床医生。根据所提供的信息,我们确定每位妇女是否接受了遵循NOF指南的护理。单变量和多变量分析确定了与指南依从性相关的因素。结果:平均年龄69岁;白人占53%,黑人占38%;15%之前有骨折。使用NOF标准,19.8%为中度骨质疏松症,80.2%为高危骨质疏松症。总体而言,57.6%(95%可信区间53.1,62.1)的患者按照NOF指南接受了风险管理。高危组(60.9% vs 44.1%, p= 0.003)、有初级保健临床医生的患者(62.0% vs 43.5%, p= 0.006)和非黑人患者(白人vs黑人67.1% vs 43.0%, p)的依从率较高。结论:在我们的研究中,超过一半的绝经后妇女接受了遵循NOF实践指南的骨质疏松症风险管理。那些高风险、非黑人或有初级保健临床医生的人更有可能根据NOF指南接受治疗,而不考虑临床医生的性别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Batterers' use of guns to threaten intimate partners. Gang and multiple rapes during military service: health consequences and health care. Immigration policies increase south Asian immigrant women's vulnerability to intimate partner violence. Impact of partner abuse on women's reproductive lives. Differential effect of damp housing on respiratory health in women.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1