Women's knowledge and sources of information on the risks and benefits of oral contraception.

Carla M Picardo, Mark Nichols, Alison Edelman, Jeffrey T Jensen
{"title":"Women's knowledge and sources of information on the risks and benefits of oral contraception.","authors":"Carla M Picardo,&nbsp;Mark Nichols,&nbsp;Alison Edelman,&nbsp;Jeffrey T Jensen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the knowledge of the risks and benefits of oral contraceptives (OCs) in a heterogeneous group of women and to identify their sources of information.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A self-administered questionnaire assessing demographics, contraception history, knowledge of risks and benefits of OCs, and information sources was given to literate English- and Spanish-speaking women waiting for appointments at 4 clinics serving distinct populations in Portland, Oregon.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately half of the 211 women studied were of the opinion that OCs decreased the risk of acne, dysmenorrhea, and menorrhagia and increased the risk of weight gain, headaches, and thrombosis. Less than 15% knew of the decreased risk of anemia, endometrial cancer, colon cancer and pelvic inflammatory disease, but 28% understood the decreased risk of ovarian cancer. Seven percent to 36% of women used their own experiences in assessing the effect of OCs on a variety of general and reproductive factors. Women relied primarily on printed information for knowledge of OCs' effects on cardiovascular health and cancer.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Women in this heterogeneous population of women were unaware of several benefits of OCs. Women relied heavily on their own experiences in assessing the risks and benefits of OCs. Women cited printed information more frequently than medical personnel as major sources of information on cardiovascular and oncological risks and benefits of OCs. The Internet, however, played a minimal, if any role in educating women about OCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":76028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Women's Association (1972)","volume":"58 2","pages":"112-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Women's Association (1972)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the knowledge of the risks and benefits of oral contraceptives (OCs) in a heterogeneous group of women and to identify their sources of information.

Methods: A self-administered questionnaire assessing demographics, contraception history, knowledge of risks and benefits of OCs, and information sources was given to literate English- and Spanish-speaking women waiting for appointments at 4 clinics serving distinct populations in Portland, Oregon.

Results: Approximately half of the 211 women studied were of the opinion that OCs decreased the risk of acne, dysmenorrhea, and menorrhagia and increased the risk of weight gain, headaches, and thrombosis. Less than 15% knew of the decreased risk of anemia, endometrial cancer, colon cancer and pelvic inflammatory disease, but 28% understood the decreased risk of ovarian cancer. Seven percent to 36% of women used their own experiences in assessing the effect of OCs on a variety of general and reproductive factors. Women relied primarily on printed information for knowledge of OCs' effects on cardiovascular health and cancer.

Conclusion: Women in this heterogeneous population of women were unaware of several benefits of OCs. Women relied heavily on their own experiences in assessing the risks and benefits of OCs. Women cited printed information more frequently than medical personnel as major sources of information on cardiovascular and oncological risks and benefits of OCs. The Internet, however, played a minimal, if any role in educating women about OCs.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妇女对口服避孕药的风险和益处的知识和信息来源。
目的:评估异质妇女群体对口服避孕药(OCs)的风险和益处的认识,并确定其信息来源。方法:对在俄勒冈州波特兰市4家不同人群的诊所等待预约的有文化的英语和西班牙语妇女进行问卷调查,评估人口统计学、避孕史、OCs的风险和益处知识以及信息来源。结果:在211名被研究的女性中,大约有一半的人认为口服避孕药降低了痤疮、痛经和月经过多的风险,增加了体重增加、头痛和血栓形成的风险。不到15%的人知道贫血、子宫内膜癌、结肠癌和盆腔炎的风险降低,但28%的人知道卵巢癌的风险降低。7%至36%的妇女利用自己的经验来评估OCs对各种一般因素和生殖因素的影响。妇女主要依靠印刷信息来了解OCs对心血管健康和癌症的影响。结论:在这一异质人群中,女性不知道OCs的一些益处。在评估OCs的风险和收益时,妇女很大程度上依赖于她们自己的经验。妇女比医务人员更频繁地引用印刷信息作为OCs的心血管和肿瘤风险和益处的主要信息来源。然而,互联网在教育女性了解OCs方面发挥的作用微乎其微。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Batterers' use of guns to threaten intimate partners. Gang and multiple rapes during military service: health consequences and health care. Immigration policies increase south Asian immigrant women's vulnerability to intimate partner violence. Impact of partner abuse on women's reproductive lives. Differential effect of damp housing on respiratory health in women.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1