Primary care satisfaction among adults with physical disabilities: the role of patient-provider communication.

Managed care quarterly Pub Date : 2003-01-01
Thilo Kroll, Phillip W Beatty, Shawn Bingham
{"title":"Primary care satisfaction among adults with physical disabilities: the role of patient-provider communication.","authors":"Thilo Kroll,&nbsp;Phillip W Beatty,&nbsp;Shawn Bingham","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine overall satisfaction with primary care among people with cerebral palsy, multiple sclerosis, and spinal cord injury, and to identify potential differences in primary care satisfaction between managed care (MC) and fee-for-service (FFS) enrollees with these physical disabilities.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The sample consisted of 195 people with cerebral palsy (CP), multiple sclerosis (MS), and spinal cord injury (SCI), between the ages of 18 and 65 who had received primary care services in the six months prior to the survey.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Satisfaction with various aspects of primary care were assessed using a 10-item self-report measure. Respondents were compared with regard to service satisfaction based on disability and insurance type (MC vs. FFS). Satisfaction items were summed up to produce an unweighted index of overall satisfaction. In the analysis we used non-parametric statistics, such as Kruskal-Wallis One Way ANOVA and Mann-Whitney Rank tests. Post hoc alpha corrections were performed using the Holms Stepdown Procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The lack of disability-specific knowledge among primary care providers is consistent with findings of other studies. People with physical disabilities in managed care plans are less satisfied with how their providers communicate with them, relative to those in FFS plans. Poor patient-provider communication may place individuals with certain physical disabilities at risk for not receiving appropriate care.</p>","PeriodicalId":79681,"journal":{"name":"Managed care quarterly","volume":"11 1","pages":"11-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Managed care quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To determine overall satisfaction with primary care among people with cerebral palsy, multiple sclerosis, and spinal cord injury, and to identify potential differences in primary care satisfaction between managed care (MC) and fee-for-service (FFS) enrollees with these physical disabilities.

Participants: The sample consisted of 195 people with cerebral palsy (CP), multiple sclerosis (MS), and spinal cord injury (SCI), between the ages of 18 and 65 who had received primary care services in the six months prior to the survey.

Measurements: Satisfaction with various aspects of primary care were assessed using a 10-item self-report measure. Respondents were compared with regard to service satisfaction based on disability and insurance type (MC vs. FFS). Satisfaction items were summed up to produce an unweighted index of overall satisfaction. In the analysis we used non-parametric statistics, such as Kruskal-Wallis One Way ANOVA and Mann-Whitney Rank tests. Post hoc alpha corrections were performed using the Holms Stepdown Procedure.

Conclusions: The lack of disability-specific knowledge among primary care providers is consistent with findings of other studies. People with physical disabilities in managed care plans are less satisfied with how their providers communicate with them, relative to those in FFS plans. Poor patient-provider communication may place individuals with certain physical disabilities at risk for not receiving appropriate care.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人身体残疾患者的初级保健满意度:医患沟通的作用。
目的:确定脑瘫、多发性硬化症和脊髓损伤患者对初级保健的总体满意度,并确定有这些身体残疾的管理式医疗(MC)和按服务收费(FFS)参保者对初级保健满意度的潜在差异。参与者:样本包括195名脑瘫(CP)、多发性硬化症(MS)和脊髓损伤(SCI)患者,年龄在18至65岁之间,在调查前6个月内接受过初级保健服务。测量:对初级保健各方面的满意度采用10项自我报告测量进行评估。受访者根据残疾和保险类型(MC vs. FFS)对服务满意度进行了比较。满意度项目被总结以产生总体满意度的未加权指数。在分析中,我们使用非参数统计,如Kruskal-Wallis单向方差分析和Mann-Whitney秩检验。采用Holms降压程序进行事后alpha校正。结论:初级保健提供者缺乏残疾特异性知识与其他研究结果一致。与FFS计划相比,管理式医疗计划中的身体残疾者对服务提供者与他们沟通的方式不太满意。不良的医患沟通可能会使某些身体残疾的个体面临得不到适当护理的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
State regulation of medical discount programs: a new frontier. A new "loyalty rewards" program in health care customer relationships. MCOs following innovative CMS remote monitoring initiative: self-testing service is designed to lower costs and improve outcomes for anticoagulation therapy. Oath-based behavior change in "out-of-control" type 2 diabetics? Ten-city disease management project intended to increase wellness efforts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1