The relationship between use of NHS Direct and deprivation in southeast London: an ecological analysis.

Jenni Burt, Richard Hooper, Lynda Jessopp
{"title":"The relationship between use of NHS Direct and deprivation in southeast London: an ecological analysis.","authors":"Jenni Burt,&nbsp;Richard Hooper,&nbsp;Lynda Jessopp","doi":"10.1093/pubmed/fdg038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Little is known about the utilization of NHS Direct by disadvantaged groups, in spite of the service aiming to be 'accessible to all'. This study investigates the relationship between use of NHS Direct and deprivation in one predominantly disadvantaged area.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ward-level call rates to NHS Direct South East London over a 6 month period were calculated using postcode data. Jarman and Townsend scores were used as a proxy of deprivation in each ward. We performed negative binomial regression to investigate the relationship between deprivation score and rate of calls to NHS Direct.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant, non-linear (quadratic) effect of deprivation score on call rates; call rates were lower in both the most affluent and most deprived wards.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Calls to NHS Direct rise with increasing deprivation until, at extreme levels of deprivation, they subsequently decline. This challenges assumptions that NHS Direct is not utilized in deprived areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":77224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/pubmed/fdg038","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of public health medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdg038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

Background: Little is known about the utilization of NHS Direct by disadvantaged groups, in spite of the service aiming to be 'accessible to all'. This study investigates the relationship between use of NHS Direct and deprivation in one predominantly disadvantaged area.

Methods: Ward-level call rates to NHS Direct South East London over a 6 month period were calculated using postcode data. Jarman and Townsend scores were used as a proxy of deprivation in each ward. We performed negative binomial regression to investigate the relationship between deprivation score and rate of calls to NHS Direct.

Results: There was a significant, non-linear (quadratic) effect of deprivation score on call rates; call rates were lower in both the most affluent and most deprived wards.

Conclusion: Calls to NHS Direct rise with increasing deprivation until, at extreme levels of deprivation, they subsequently decline. This challenges assumptions that NHS Direct is not utilized in deprived areas.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伦敦东南部使用NHS直接服务与贫困之间的关系:生态学分析。
背景:尽管该服务旨在“向所有人开放”,但对弱势群体使用NHS Direct知之甚少。本研究调查了在一个主要处于不利地位的地区使用NHS直接和剥夺之间的关系。方法:使用邮政编码数据计算6个月期间NHS直拨伦敦东南部的病房级通话率。贾曼和汤森评分被用作每个病房的剥夺程度的代表。我们执行负二项回归来调查剥夺评分和NHS直接呼叫率之间的关系。结果:剥夺评分对呼出率有显著的非线性(二次)影响;在最富裕和最贫困的病房,电话率都较低。结论:对国民保健服务的呼吁随着剥夺的增加而直接上升,直到极端剥夺水平,它们随后下降。这挑战了在贫困地区不使用NHS Direct的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Public health medicine. Military Health Care : From Pre-Deployment to Post-Separation Urban-rural differences in self-reported limiting long-term illness in Scotland. Inhalation sedation with nitrous oxide as an alternative to dental general anaesthesia for children. Cancer patients' awareness about their diagnosis: a population-based study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1