Sources of interference in field studies of diesel exhaust emissions.

G Sirianni, S Chemerynski, H J Cohen, R Wheeler, J Borak
{"title":"Sources of interference in field studies of diesel exhaust emissions.","authors":"G Sirianni,&nbsp;S Chemerynski,&nbsp;H J Cohen,&nbsp;R Wheeler,&nbsp;J Borak","doi":"10.1080/10473220301414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article describes interferences encountered in a variety of occupational settings during industrial hygiene surveys of diesel particulate material (DPM) using the NIOSH 5040 Method. The method yields time-weighted-average measurements of elemental carbon (EC), organic carbon (OC), and total carbon (TC = EC + OC). NIOSH recommends EC as proxy for DPM, but other agencies (e.g., MSHA) regulate exposure as TC. Surveys were conducted in an engine factory and a wood treatment plant where diesel equipment was used, and in a foundry where its use was being considered. Full shift samples were collected using open-faced cassettes and cyclones fitted with 37-mm quartz fiber filters analyzed by the NIOSH 5040 Method. Non-DPM-related interferences were noted for both the OC and EC. In the engine factory and wood treatment facility, OC measurements were very high (range of 10.0-1600 microg/m(3)), while EC levels were mostly below the LOD. These findings almost certainly reflect interferences by cutting oil mists and airborne creosote respectively. In the foundry, EC levels were high and comprised mainly of larger (>4 microm) particles (open face samples: arithmetic mean = 136 microg/m(3), geometric mean = 74.0 microg/m(3); cyclone samples: arithmetic mean = 30.2 microg/m(3), geometric mean = 14.7 microg/m(3)). These findings suggest that OC interferences should be suspected if the EC:TC ratio is <0.35 and, if DPM surveys are performed with open-faced samplers, at least a small number of size-selective samplers should be employed to assure that results do not reflect EC interference by larger (i.e., >1-4 microm) particles. They also support the ACGIH decision to modify its proposed DPM TLV to specifically consider elemental carbon, rather than total carbon.</p>","PeriodicalId":8182,"journal":{"name":"Applied occupational and environmental hygiene","volume":"18 8","pages":"591-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10473220301414","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied occupational and environmental hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10473220301414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

This article describes interferences encountered in a variety of occupational settings during industrial hygiene surveys of diesel particulate material (DPM) using the NIOSH 5040 Method. The method yields time-weighted-average measurements of elemental carbon (EC), organic carbon (OC), and total carbon (TC = EC + OC). NIOSH recommends EC as proxy for DPM, but other agencies (e.g., MSHA) regulate exposure as TC. Surveys were conducted in an engine factory and a wood treatment plant where diesel equipment was used, and in a foundry where its use was being considered. Full shift samples were collected using open-faced cassettes and cyclones fitted with 37-mm quartz fiber filters analyzed by the NIOSH 5040 Method. Non-DPM-related interferences were noted for both the OC and EC. In the engine factory and wood treatment facility, OC measurements were very high (range of 10.0-1600 microg/m(3)), while EC levels were mostly below the LOD. These findings almost certainly reflect interferences by cutting oil mists and airborne creosote respectively. In the foundry, EC levels were high and comprised mainly of larger (>4 microm) particles (open face samples: arithmetic mean = 136 microg/m(3), geometric mean = 74.0 microg/m(3); cyclone samples: arithmetic mean = 30.2 microg/m(3), geometric mean = 14.7 microg/m(3)). These findings suggest that OC interferences should be suspected if the EC:TC ratio is <0.35 and, if DPM surveys are performed with open-faced samplers, at least a small number of size-selective samplers should be employed to assure that results do not reflect EC interference by larger (i.e., >1-4 microm) particles. They also support the ACGIH decision to modify its proposed DPM TLV to specifically consider elemental carbon, rather than total carbon.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
柴油机废气排放现场研究中的干扰源。
本文描述了在使用NIOSH 5040方法对柴油颗粒材料(DPM)进行工业卫生调查期间,在各种职业环境中遇到的干扰。该方法产生元素碳(EC)、有机碳(OC)和总碳(TC = EC + OC)的时间加权平均测量值。NIOSH建议EC作为DPM的替代品,但其他机构(如MSHA)将暴露作为TC进行监管。在使用柴油设备的一家发动机厂和一家木材处理厂以及正在考虑使用柴油设备的一家铸造厂进行了调查。全位移样品使用装有37-mm石英纤维过滤器的开放式盒式和旋流器收集,采用NIOSH 5040方法进行分析。在OC和EC中都注意到非dpm相关的干扰。在发动机工厂和木材处理厂,OC测量值非常高(范围为10.0-1600微克/米(3)),而EC水平大多低于LOD。这些发现几乎肯定分别反映了切割油雾和空气中的杂酚油的干扰。在铸造厂,EC水平很高,主要由较大的(>4微米)颗粒组成(露天样品:算术平均值= 136微克/米(3),几何平均值= 74.0微克/米(3);气旋样本:算术平均值= 30.2微克/米(3),几何平均值= 14.7微克/米(3))。这些发现表明,如果EC:TC比值为1-4微米),则应怀疑存在OC干扰。他们还支持ACGIH决定修改其提议的DPM TLV,专门考虑元素碳,而不是总碳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Field Evaluation of Mandelic Acid in Urine as a Compliance Monitor for Styrene Exposure The Impact of Boundary Layer Separation on Local Exhaust Design and Worker Exposure Air-Lead Particle Sizes in Battery Manufacturing: Potential Effects on the OSHA Compliance Model Risk Assessment for Carcinogens: A Comparison of Approaches of the ACGIH and the EPA Industrial Ventilation News Digest
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1