Beta-radiation therapy for long lesions in native coronary vessels

Goran Stankovic , Dejan Orlic , Carlo Di Mario , Nicola Corvaja , Flavio Airoldi , Alaide Chieffo , Antonio Amato , Roberto Orecchia , Antonio Colombo
{"title":"Beta-radiation therapy for long lesions in native coronary vessels","authors":"Goran Stankovic ,&nbsp;Dejan Orlic ,&nbsp;Carlo Di Mario ,&nbsp;Nicola Corvaja ,&nbsp;Flavio Airoldi ,&nbsp;Alaide Chieffo ,&nbsp;Antonio Amato ,&nbsp;Roberto Orecchia ,&nbsp;Antonio Colombo","doi":"10.1016/S1522-1865(03)00122-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Objective:</strong> The purpose of this study was to evaluate effectiveness and to compare clinical outcome of intracoronary beta-radiation to treat long lesions (&gt;20 mm) in patients with de novo stenosis vs. patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR). <strong>Methods:</strong> A matched comparison of 44 patients with 63 de novo lesions and 48 patients with 63 ISR lesions (&gt;20 mm) treated with intracoronary beta-radiation was performed. <strong>Results</strong>: Stents were implanted in 65.1% of de novo and 19% of ISR lesions (<em>P</em>=.001). Radiation doses delivered were 17.2±3.0 vs. 20.3±3.0 Gy at 2 mm from the source center for de novo and ISR lesions. There was no difference in the incidence of in-hospital events. Clinical follow-up at 16.4±6.7 months showed no difference in major adverse cardiac events (MACE) between de novo and ISR patients (27.3% vs. 25%, <em>P</em>=.8). Late total occlusions (LTOs) occurred in eight patients (four in each group) treated with stents at the time of radiation and after discontinuation of ticlopidine. By multivariate analysis, stent implantation was the only predictor of late occlusions (OR 8.25, 95% CI 1.73–38.46, <em>P</em>&lt;.008). Restenosis rates were similar for de novo and ISR lesions (29.3% vs. 23.2%, <em>P</em>=.46), as well as target lesion revascularization (TLR) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) rates (22.7% vs. 22.9% and 29.5% vs. 29.2%, respectively). <strong>Conclusions:</strong> Intracoronary beta-radiation gives comparable results when used to treat de novo or ISR lesions provided new stent implantation can be avoided. Long-term combined antiplatelet therapy is mandatory for patients who receive new stents at the time of radiation treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":80261,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular radiation medicine","volume":"4 1","pages":"Pages 18-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1522-1865(03)00122-7","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular radiation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1522186503001227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate effectiveness and to compare clinical outcome of intracoronary beta-radiation to treat long lesions (>20 mm) in patients with de novo stenosis vs. patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR). Methods: A matched comparison of 44 patients with 63 de novo lesions and 48 patients with 63 ISR lesions (>20 mm) treated with intracoronary beta-radiation was performed. Results: Stents were implanted in 65.1% of de novo and 19% of ISR lesions (P=.001). Radiation doses delivered were 17.2±3.0 vs. 20.3±3.0 Gy at 2 mm from the source center for de novo and ISR lesions. There was no difference in the incidence of in-hospital events. Clinical follow-up at 16.4±6.7 months showed no difference in major adverse cardiac events (MACE) between de novo and ISR patients (27.3% vs. 25%, P=.8). Late total occlusions (LTOs) occurred in eight patients (four in each group) treated with stents at the time of radiation and after discontinuation of ticlopidine. By multivariate analysis, stent implantation was the only predictor of late occlusions (OR 8.25, 95% CI 1.73–38.46, P<.008). Restenosis rates were similar for de novo and ISR lesions (29.3% vs. 23.2%, P=.46), as well as target lesion revascularization (TLR) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) rates (22.7% vs. 22.9% and 29.5% vs. 29.2%, respectively). Conclusions: Intracoronary beta-radiation gives comparable results when used to treat de novo or ISR lesions provided new stent implantation can be avoided. Long-term combined antiplatelet therapy is mandatory for patients who receive new stents at the time of radiation treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自体冠状血管长病变的放射治疗
目的:本研究的目的是评估冠状动脉内β -放射治疗新发狭窄患者和支架内再狭窄(ISR)患者长病变(> 20mm)的有效性和临床结果的比较。方法:对44例63例新发病变患者与48例63例ISR病变(>20 mm)行冠状动脉内放射治疗的患者进行配对比较。结果:65.1%的新生患者和19%的ISR病变植入了支架(P= 0.001)。对于新生和ISR病变,距离源中心2mm处的放射剂量分别为17.2±3.0 Gy和20.3±3.0 Gy。两组住院事件的发生率没有差异。在16.4±6.7个月的临床随访中,新生患者和ISR患者的主要不良心脏事件(MACE)无差异(27.3% vs. 25%, P= 0.8)。在放疗时和停用噻氯匹定后,支架治疗的8例患者(每组4例)发生晚期全闭塞(LTOs)。通过多因素分析,支架植入是晚期闭塞的唯一预测因素(OR 8.25, 95% CI 1.73-38.46, P< 0.008)。新生和ISR病变的再狭窄率相似(29.3%比23.2%,P= 0.46),靶病变重建术(TLR)和靶血管重建术(TVR)率分别为22.7%比22.9%和29.5%比29.2%。结论:如果可以避免新的支架植入,冠状动脉内β -放射治疗新发或ISR病变的效果相当。长期联合抗血小板治疗对于在放射治疗期间接受新支架的患者是强制性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abstracts No change in endothelial-dependent vasomotion late after coronary irradiation Clinical and angiographic outcomes of cardiac transplant patients treated with intracoronary beta-radiation for in-stent restenosis Brachytherapy with gamma radiation of a coronary artery for in-stent restenosis may induce the regression of in-stent restenosis of an adjacent coronary artery without angioplasty. First case report and review of the literature Endovascular treatment of peripheral vascular disease: before or after coronary surgery?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1