Critical literature review of determinants and levels of occupational benzene exposure for United States community-based case-control studies.

Edwin van Wijngaarden, Patricia A Stewart
{"title":"Critical literature review of determinants and levels of occupational benzene exposure for United States community-based case-control studies.","authors":"Edwin van Wijngaarden,&nbsp;Patricia A Stewart","doi":"10.1080/10473220301376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article presents the results of an extensive literature review identifying the uses or occurrences of, and exposures to, benzene in a variety of industries for a community-based case-control study of childhood brain cancer in the United States and Canada. We focused on industries for which quantitative exposure data were identified in studies conducted in North America in the 1980s. Each industry was coded according to the 1987 Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) system. For each industry, information relevant to exposure assessment, including process descriptions, job titles, tasks, and work practices, was summarized when available. Estimates of probability and intensity of exposure, and our confidence in these estimates are presented. Arithmetic means (AMs), weighted for the number of measurements for each industry, were calculated based on measurement data from long-term (i.e., 60+ minutes) personal sampling; short-term or area samples were only used when no other data were available for a given industry. Industries for which no quantitative exposure levels were identified in the North American literature but for which information was found on benzene use are briefly described. Published exposure data indicate that workers in most industries in the 1980s experienced exposure levels below the current standard of 1 part per million (ppm), with a weighted AM of 0.33 ppm across all industries. Despite the longtime recognition of the hematological effects of benzene, little information was available on exposure levels and determinants for many industries with potential exposure. Nevertheless, this review may clarify some of the procedures involved in assessing occupational exposures in community-based studies and may aid in the interpretation of previous occupational studies that relied on job title or industry.</p>","PeriodicalId":8182,"journal":{"name":"Applied occupational and environmental hygiene","volume":"18 9","pages":"678-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10473220301376","citationCount":"38","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied occupational and environmental hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10473220301376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

Abstract

This article presents the results of an extensive literature review identifying the uses or occurrences of, and exposures to, benzene in a variety of industries for a community-based case-control study of childhood brain cancer in the United States and Canada. We focused on industries for which quantitative exposure data were identified in studies conducted in North America in the 1980s. Each industry was coded according to the 1987 Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) system. For each industry, information relevant to exposure assessment, including process descriptions, job titles, tasks, and work practices, was summarized when available. Estimates of probability and intensity of exposure, and our confidence in these estimates are presented. Arithmetic means (AMs), weighted for the number of measurements for each industry, were calculated based on measurement data from long-term (i.e., 60+ minutes) personal sampling; short-term or area samples were only used when no other data were available for a given industry. Industries for which no quantitative exposure levels were identified in the North American literature but for which information was found on benzene use are briefly described. Published exposure data indicate that workers in most industries in the 1980s experienced exposure levels below the current standard of 1 part per million (ppm), with a weighted AM of 0.33 ppm across all industries. Despite the longtime recognition of the hematological effects of benzene, little information was available on exposure levels and determinants for many industries with potential exposure. Nevertheless, this review may clarify some of the procedures involved in assessing occupational exposures in community-based studies and may aid in the interpretation of previous occupational studies that relied on job title or industry.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国社区病例对照研究中职业性苯暴露的决定因素和水平的关键文献综述。
本文介绍了一项广泛的文献综述的结果,该综述确定了苯在美国和加拿大以社区为基础的儿童脑癌病例对照研究中在各种行业中的使用、发生和暴露。我们关注的是1980年代在北美进行的研究中确定了定量暴露数据的行业。每个行业都是根据1987年标准行业分类(SIC)系统进行编码的。对于每个行业,与暴露评估相关的信息,包括过程描述、职位名称、任务和工作实践,在可用时进行了总结。给出了暴露的概率和强度的估计,以及我们对这些估计的置信度。算术平均数(AMs)是根据长期(即60分钟以上)个人抽样的测量数据计算得出的,对每个行业的测量次数进行加权;只有在没有其他数据可用的情况下,才使用短期或区域样本。简要描述了在北美文献中没有确定定量接触水平但发现苯使用信息的行业。公开的暴露数据表明,在20世纪80年代,大多数行业的工人所经历的暴露水平低于目前的百万分之一(ppm)标准,所有行业的加权AM为0.33 ppm。尽管长期以来人们认识到苯对血液系统的影响,但对于许多可能接触苯的行业,关于苯的接触水平和决定因素的信息很少。尽管如此,这篇综述可能会澄清社区研究中评估职业暴露所涉及的一些程序,并可能有助于解释以前依赖于职称或行业的职业研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Field Evaluation of Mandelic Acid in Urine as a Compliance Monitor for Styrene Exposure The Impact of Boundary Layer Separation on Local Exhaust Design and Worker Exposure Air-Lead Particle Sizes in Battery Manufacturing: Potential Effects on the OSHA Compliance Model Risk Assessment for Carcinogens: A Comparison of Approaches of the ACGIH and the EPA Industrial Ventilation News Digest
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1